Literature DB >> 23182385

Biomechanical properties of an intact, injured, repaired, and healed femur: an experimental and computational study.

Hamid Ebrahimi1, Mikhail Rabinovich, Viktor Vuleta, Daniel Zalcman, Suraj Shah, Anton Dubov, Kavya Roy, Faisal Sharaf Siddiqui, Emil H Schemitsch, Habiba Bougherara, Rad Zdero.   

Abstract

There is no "gold standard" treatment for femoral mid-shaft fractures near the tip of a hip implant. Moreover, no study has quantified the changes in a femur's mechanical properties from injury through to healing. The present aim was to predict overall stiffness and peak bone stress in the same femur after injury, repair, and healing with respect to its intact condition. Stage 1 was an intact femur. Stage 2 mimicked a femur with a hip stem. Stage 3 had a 5-mm fracture gap repaired with a plate and screws. Stage 4 represented complete fracture union. Experiments were done on a synthetic femur with strain gages and subjected to 1500 N of axial force. Finite element (FE) models were validated against experiments and then re-analyzed using a clinical-level force of 3000 N. At 1500 N, FE vs. experimental strains had excellent linear agreement (R=0.94; slope=0.97). At 3000 N, FE stiffnesses were 2167 N/mm (Stage 1), 2359 N/mm (Stage 2), 973 N/mm (Stage 3), and 3348 N/mm (Stage 4), showing that Stage 3 was the least stable compared to Stage 1. At 3000 N, FE bone stresses yielded peaks of 75.7 MPa at the load application point (Stage 1), 29.0 MPa near the hip implant tip (Stage 2), 126.3 MPa at the distal portion of the plate (Stage 3), and 69.3 MPa at the proximal portion of the plate (Stage 4), showing that Stage 3 was most vulnerable to re-injury compared to Stage 1. Stress shielding and high stresses were present not only after hip implantation and plating, but also after healing.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23182385     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1878-0180


  5 in total

1.  Biomechanical features of six design of the delta external fixator for treating Pilon fracture: a finite element study.

Authors:  Muhammad Hanif Ramlee; Mohd Ayub Sulong; Evelyn Garcia-Nieto; Daniel Angure Penaranda; Antonio Ros Felip; Mohammed Rafiq Abdul Kadir
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Influence of PEEK Coating on Hip Implant Stress Shielding: A Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Jesica Anguiano-Sanchez; Oscar Martinez-Romero; Hector R Siller; Jose A Diaz-Elizondo; Eduardo Flores-Villalba; Ciro A Rodriguez
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 2.238

3.  Biomechanical Analysis Using FEA and Experiments of Metal Plate and Bone Strut Repair of a Femur Midshaft Segmental Defect.

Authors:  Jason Coquim; Joseph Clemenzi; Mohsen Salahi; Abdurahman Sherif; Pouria Tavakkoli Avval; Suraj Shah; Emil H Schemitsch; Z Shaghayegh Bagheri; Habiba Bougherara; Radovan Zdero
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  An engineering review of external fixators.

Authors:  P L N Fernando; Aravinda Abeygunawardane; Pci Wijesinghe; Parakrama Dharmaratne; Pujitha Silva
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 2.242

5.  Biomechanical comparison of five cannulated screw fixation strategies for young vertical femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Dajun Jiang; Shi Zhan; Lei Wang; Lewis L Shi; Ming Ling; Hai Hu; Weitao Jia
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 3.494

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.