Literature DB >> 2967874

Postfusional latency in stereoscopic slant perception and the primitives of stereopsis.

B Gillam1, D Chambers, T Russo.   

Abstract

Random dot stereograms of slanted surfaces were constructed, each representing one or two slanted surfaces in different relative arrangements and with different axes. Latency to fusion and from fusion to stereoscopic resolution was measured for each stimulus. It was found that latency to fusion was always very brief but that latency to stereoscopic resolution varied markedly, depending upon the orientation and arrangement of the stereoscopic surfaces. A gradient of discontinuities at a surface boundary produced an instant slant response for that surface, whereas a gradient of absolute disparities across the surface did not, except under conditions where vertical declination (a form of orientation disparity) was present. We conclude that stereopsis is not based on the primitives used in matching the images for fusion and that it is, at least initially, a response to disparity discontinuities which play no role in the fusion process. We also conclude that vertical declination is responded to globally as a slant around a horizontal axis but that other forms of orientation disparity are ineffective. The evidence from our experiments does not support the existence of a stereoscopic ability to respond globally to differences in magnification (or spatial frequency). It is suggested that stereoscopic perception of slant around a vertical axis is slow because it results from the integration of local processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2967874     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.14.2.163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  10 in total

1.  Hysteresis, cooperativity, and depth averaging in dynamic random-dot stereograms.

Authors:  B L Anderson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-06

2.  Focus cues affect perceived depth.

Authors:  Simon J Watt; Kurt Akeley; Marc O Ernst; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Early dynamics of stereoscopic surface slant perception.

Authors:  Baptiste Caziot; Benjamin T Backus; Esther Lin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 4.  The third dimension in the primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Gerald Westheimer
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Alternation frequency thresholds for stereopsis as a technique for exploring stereoscopic difficulties.

Authors:  Svetlana Rychkova; Jacques Ninio
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2011-03-30

6.  Perception of 3D Slant Out of the Box.

Authors:  Katinka van der Kooij; Susan F Te Pas
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-06-06

7.  Binocular Depth Judgments on Smoothly Curved Surfaces.

Authors:  Rebecca L Hornsey; Paul B Hibbard; Peter Scarfe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Slant of a Surface Shifts Binocular Visual Direction.

Authors:  Tsutomu Kusano; Koichi Shimono
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-06

9.  A mid-level explanation for the venetian blind effect.

Authors:  Barbara J Gillam; Susan G Wardle
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-12-03

10.  Orientation-specific learning of the prior assumption for 3D slant perception.

Authors:  Shuichiro Taya; Masayuki Sato
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.