OBJECTIVE: The optimal margin size in postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases is unknown. Herein, the authors investigated the effect of SRS planning target volume (PTV) margin on local recurrence and symptomatic radiation necrosis postoperatively. METHODS: Records of patients who received postoperative LINAC-based SRS for brain metastases between 2006 and 2016 were reviewed and stratified based on PTV margin size (1.0 or > 1.0 mm). Patients were treated using frameless and framed SRS techniques, and both single-fraction and hypofractionated dosing were used based on lesion size. Kaplan-Meier and cumulative incidence models were used to estimate survival and intracranial outcomes, respectively. Multivariate analyses were also performed. RESULTS: A total of 133 patients with 139 cavities were identified; 36 patients (27.1%) and 35 lesions (25.2%) were in the 1.0-mm group, and 97 patients (72.9%) and 104 lesions (74.8%) were in the > 1.0-mm group. Patient characteristics were balanced, except the 1.0-mm cohort had a better Eastern Cooperative Group Performance Status (grade 0: 36.1% vs 19.6%), higher mean number of brain metastases (1.75 vs 1.31), lower prescription isodose line (80% vs 95%), and lower median single fraction-equivalent dose (15.0 vs 17.5 Gy) (all p < 0.05). The median survival and follow-up for all patients were 15.6 months and 17.7 months, respectively. No significant difference in local recurrence was noted between the cohorts. An increased 1-year rate of symptomatic radionecrosis was seen in the larger margin group (20.9% vs 6.0%, p = 0.028). On multivariate analyses, margin size > 1.0 mm was associated with an increased risk for symptomatic radionecrosis (HR 3.07, 95% CI 1.13-8.34; p = 0.028), while multifraction SRS emerged as a protective factor for symptomatic radionecrosis (HR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02-0.76; p = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: Expanding the PTV margin beyond 1.0 mm is not associated with improved local recurrence but appears to increase the risk of symptomatic radionecrosis after postoperative SRS.
OBJECTIVE: The optimal margin size in postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases is unknown. Herein, the authors investigated the effect of SRS planning target volume (PTV) margin on local recurrence and symptomatic radiation necrosis postoperatively. METHODS: Records of patients who received postoperative LINAC-based SRS for brain metastases between 2006 and 2016 were reviewed and stratified based on PTV margin size (1.0 or > 1.0 mm). Patients were treated using frameless and framed SRS techniques, and both single-fraction and hypofractionated dosing were used based on lesion size. Kaplan-Meier and cumulative incidence models were used to estimate survival and intracranial outcomes, respectively. Multivariate analyses were also performed. RESULTS: A total of 133 patients with 139 cavities were identified; 36 patients (27.1%) and 35 lesions (25.2%) were in the 1.0-mm group, and 97 patients (72.9%) and 104 lesions (74.8%) were in the > 1.0-mm group. Patient characteristics were balanced, except the 1.0-mm cohort had a better Eastern Cooperative Group Performance Status (grade 0: 36.1% vs 19.6%), higher mean number of brain metastases (1.75 vs 1.31), lower prescription isodose line (80% vs 95%), and lower median single fraction-equivalent dose (15.0 vs 17.5 Gy) (all p < 0.05). The median survival and follow-up for all patients were 15.6 months and 17.7 months, respectively. No significant difference in local recurrence was noted between the cohorts. An increased 1-year rate of symptomatic radionecrosis was seen in the larger margin group (20.9% vs 6.0%, p = 0.028). On multivariate analyses, margin size > 1.0 mm was associated with an increased risk for symptomatic radionecrosis (HR 3.07, 95% CI 1.13-8.34; p = 0.028), while multifraction SRS emerged as a protective factor for symptomatic radionecrosis (HR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02-0.76; p = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: Expanding the PTV margin beyond 1.0 mm is not associated with improved local recurrence but appears to increase the risk of symptomatic radionecrosis after postoperative SRS.
Authors: Bree R Eaton; Michael J LaRiviere; Michael J La Riviere; Sungjin Kim; Roshan S Prabhu; Kirtesh Patel; Shravan Kandula; Nelson Oyesiku; Jeffrey Olson; Walter Curran; Hui-Kuo Shu; Ian Crocker Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2015-04-11 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Cameron Brennan; T Jonathan Yang; Patrick Hilden; Zhigang Zhang; Kelvin Chan; Yoshiya Yamada; Timothy A Chan; Stella C Lymberis; Ashwatha Narayana; Viviane Tabar; Philip H Gutin; Åse Ballangrud; Eric Lis; Kathryn Beal Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2014-01-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Kirtesh R Patel; Roshan S Prabhu; Shravan Kandula; Daniel E Oliver; Sungjin Kim; Constantinos Hadjipanayis; Jeffery J Olson; Nelson Oyesiku; Walter J Curran; Mohammad K Khan; Hui-Kuo Shu; Ian Crocker Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2014-09-05 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: John P Kirkpatrick; Zhiheng Wang; John H Sampson; Frances McSherry; James E Herndon; Karen J Allen; Eileen Duffy; Jenny K Hoang; Zheng Chang; David S Yoo; Chris R Kelsey; Fang-Fang Yin Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2014-10-21 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Kirtesh R Patel; David H Lawson; Ragini R Kudchadkar; Bradley C Carthon; Daniel E Oliver; Derick Okwan-Duodu; Rafi Ahmed; Mohammad K Khan Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2015-05-25 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Brian J Blonigen; Ryan D Steinmetz; Linda Levin; Michael A Lamba; Ronald E Warnick; John C Breneman Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2009-09-23 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Alexander K Kwon; Steven J Dibiase; Brian Wang; Samuel L Hughes; Barry Milcarek; Yunping Zhu Journal: Cancer Date: 2009-02-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: David Mathieu; Douglas Kondziolka; John C Flickinger; David Fortin; Brendan Kenny; Karine Michaud; Sanjay Mongia; Ajay Niranjan; L Dade Lunsford Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Kirtesh R Patel; Mudit Chowdhary; Jeffrey M Switchenko; Ragini Kudchadkar; David H Lawson; Richard J Cassidy; Roshan S Prabhu; Mohammad K Khan Journal: Melanoma Res Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Eric L Chang; Jeffrey S Wefel; Kenneth R Hess; Pamela K Allen; Frederick F Lang; David G Kornguth; Rebecca B Arbuckle; J Michael Swint; Almon S Shiu; Moshe H Maor; Christina A Meyers Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2009-10-02 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Giuseppe Minniti; Maximilian Niyazi; Nicolaus Andratschke; Matthias Guckenberger; Joshua D Palmer; Helen A Shih; Simon S Lo; Scott Soltys; Ivana Russo; Paul D Brown; Claus Belka Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2021-04-15 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Balamurugan A Vellayappan; Tresa McGranahan; Jerome Graber; Lynne Taylor; Vyshak Venur; Richard Ellenbogen; Andrew E Sloan; Kristin J Redmond; Matthew Foote; Samuel T Chao; John H Suh; Eric L Chang; Arjun Sahgal; Simon S Lo Journal: Curr Treat Options Oncol Date: 2021-06-07
Authors: Lauren Pudsey; Annette Haworth; Paul White; Zoe Moutrie; Benjamin Jonker; Matthew Foote; Joel Poder Journal: Phys Eng Sci Med Date: 2022-02-03