Cameron Brennan1, T Jonathan Yang2, Patrick Hilden3, Zhigang Zhang3, Kelvin Chan2, Yoshiya Yamada2, Timothy A Chan4, Stella C Lymberis5, Ashwatha Narayana6, Viviane Tabar7, Philip H Gutin7, Åse Ballangrud8, Eric Lis9, Kathryn Beal10. 1. Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 4. Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York. 6. Department of Radiation Oncology, Greenwich Hospital, Greenwich, Connecticut. 7. Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 8. Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 9. Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 10. Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. Electronic address: BealK@MSKCC.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate local control after surgical resection and postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 49 patients (50 lesions) were enrolled and available for analysis. Eligibility criteria included histologically confirmed malignancy with 1 or 2 intraparenchymal brain metastases, age≥18 years, and Karnofsky performance status (KPS)≥70. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to test for significant associations between clinical factors and overall survival (OS). Competing risks regression models, as well as cumulative incidence functions, were fit using the method of Fine and Gray to assess the association between clinical factors and both local failure (LF; recurrence within surgical cavity or SRS target), and regional failure (RF; intracranial metastasis outside of treated volume). RESULTS: The median follow-up was 12.0 months (range, 1.0-94.1 months). After surgical resection, 39 patients with 40 lesions were treated a median of 31 days (range, 7-56 days) later with SRS to the surgical bed to a median dose of 1800 cGy (range, 1500-2200 cGy). Of the 50 lesions, 15 (30%) demonstrated LF after surgery. The cumulative LF and RF rates were 22% and 44% at 12 months. Patients who went on to receive SRS had a significantly lower incidence of LF (P=.008). Other factors associated with improved local control include non-small cell lung cancer histology (P=.048), tumor diameter<3 cm (P=.010), and deep parenchymal tumors (P=.036). Large tumors (≥3 cm) with superficial dural/pial involvement showed the highest risk for LF (53.3% at 12 months). Large superficial lesions treated with SRS had a 54.5% LF. Infratentorial lesions were associated with a higher risk of developing RF compared to supratentorial lesions (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative SRS is associated with high rates of local control, especially for deep brain metastases<3 cm. Tumors≥3 cm with superficial dural/pial involvement demonstrate the highest risk of LF.
PURPOSE: To evaluate local control after surgical resection and postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 49 patients (50 lesions) were enrolled and available for analysis. Eligibility criteria included histologically confirmed malignancy with 1 or 2 intraparenchymal brain metastases, age≥18 years, and Karnofsky performance status (KPS)≥70. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to test for significant associations between clinical factors and overall survival (OS). Competing risks regression models, as well as cumulative incidence functions, were fit using the method of Fine and Gray to assess the association between clinical factors and both local failure (LF; recurrence within surgical cavity or SRS target), and regional failure (RF; intracranial metastasis outside of treated volume). RESULTS: The median follow-up was 12.0 months (range, 1.0-94.1 months). After surgical resection, 39 patients with 40 lesions were treated a median of 31 days (range, 7-56 days) later with SRS to the surgical bed to a median dose of 1800 cGy (range, 1500-2200 cGy). Of the 50 lesions, 15 (30%) demonstrated LF after surgery. The cumulative LF and RF rates were 22% and 44% at 12 months. Patients who went on to receive SRS had a significantly lower incidence of LF (P=.008). Other factors associated with improved local control include non-small cell lung cancer histology (P=.048), tumor diameter<3 cm (P=.010), and deep parenchymal tumors (P=.036). Large tumors (≥3 cm) with superficial dural/pial involvement showed the highest risk for LF (53.3% at 12 months). Large superficial lesions treated with SRS had a 54.5% LF. Infratentorial lesions were associated with a higher risk of developing RF compared to supratentorial lesions (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative SRS is associated with high rates of local control, especially for deep brain metastases<3 cm. Tumors≥3 cm with superficial dural/pial involvement demonstrate the highest risk of LF.
Authors: Brian J Blonigen; Ryan D Steinmetz; Linda Levin; Michael A Lamba; Ronald E Warnick; John C Breneman Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2009-09-23 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: David Mathieu; Douglas Kondziolka; John C Flickinger; David Fortin; Brendan Kenny; Karine Michaud; Sanjay Mongia; Ajay Niranjan; L Dade Lunsford Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Eric L Chang; Jeffrey S Wefel; Kenneth R Hess; Pamela K Allen; Frederick F Lang; David G Kornguth; Rebecca B Arbuckle; J Michael Swint; Almon S Shiu; Moshe H Maor; Christina A Meyers Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2009-10-02 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Marcel A Kamp; Philipp J Slotty; Jan F Cornelius; Hans-Jakob Steiger; Marion Rapp; Michael Sabel Journal: Neurosurg Rev Date: 2016-07-09 Impact factor: 3.042
Authors: Ahmad Walid Ayas; Stefan Grau; Karolina Jablonska; Daniel Ruess; Maximilian Ruge; Simone Marnitz; Roland Goldbrunner; Martin Kocher Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2018-09-14 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Anthony L Asher; Mohammed Ali Alvi; Mohamad Bydon; Nader Pouratian; Ronald E Warnick; James McInerney; Inga S Grills; Jason Sheehan Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2021-01-22 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Douglas Kondziolka; Samuel M Shin; Andrew Brunswick; Irene Kim; Joshua S Silverman Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2014-09-28 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Assaf Berger; Ido Strauss; Shlomit Ben Moshe; Benjamin W Corn; Dror Limon; Nathan Shtraus; Tal Shahar; Andrew A Kanner Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2018-08-04 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Michela Buglione; Sara Pedretti; Stefano Gipponi; Luciano Buttolo; Paolo Panciani; Pietro Luigi Poliani; Roberto Liserre; Paolo Borghetti; Ludovica Pegurri; Loredana Costa; Luca Triggiani; Nadia Pasinetti; Paolo Ghirardelli; Sara Pandini; Alessandro Padovani; Stefano Maria Magrini Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 3.469