BACKGROUND: This retrospective review evaluated the efficacy and toxicity profiles of various dose fractionations using hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) in the treatment of brain metastases. METHODS: Between 2004 and 2007, 36 patients with 66 brain metastases were treated with HSRT. Nine of these subjects were excluded because of the absence of post-treatment magnetic resonance imaging scans, resulting in 27 patients with a total of 52 lesions. Of these 52 lesions, 45 lesions were treated with whole-brain radiotherapy plus a HSRT boost and 7 lesions were treated with HSRT as the primary treatment. The median prescribed dose was 25 grays (Gy) (range, 20 Gy-36 Gy) with a median of 5 fractions (range, 4 fractions-6 fractions) to a median 85% isodose line (range, 50%-100%). The median follow-up interval was 6.6 months (range, 0.9 months-26.8 months). RESULTS: The median overall survival time was 10.8 months, and 66.7% of patients died of disease progression. After HSRT treatment of 52 brain lesions, 13 lesions demonstrated complete responses, 12 lesions demonstrated partial responses, 22 lesions demonstrated stable disease, and 5 lesions demonstrated progressive disease. Actuarial local tumor control rates at 6 months and 1 year were 93.9% and 68.2%, respectively. Maximum tumor dimension, concurrent chemotherapy, and a tumor volume <1 cc were found to be statistically significant factors for local tumor control. One patient had a grade 3 toxicity (according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events). CONCLUSIONS: HSRT provides a high level of tumor control with minimal toxicity comparable to single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The results of the current study warrant a prospective randomized study comparing single-fraction SRS with HSRT in this patient population. (c) 2009 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND: This retrospective review evaluated the efficacy and toxicity profiles of various dose fractionations using hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) in the treatment of brain metastases. METHODS: Between 2004 and 2007, 36 patients with 66 brain metastases were treated with HSRT. Nine of these subjects were excluded because of the absence of post-treatment magnetic resonance imaging scans, resulting in 27 patients with a total of 52 lesions. Of these 52 lesions, 45 lesions were treated with whole-brain radiotherapy plus a HSRT boost and 7 lesions were treated with HSRT as the primary treatment. The median prescribed dose was 25 grays (Gy) (range, 20 Gy-36 Gy) with a median of 5 fractions (range, 4 fractions-6 fractions) to a median 85% isodose line (range, 50%-100%). The median follow-up interval was 6.6 months (range, 0.9 months-26.8 months). RESULTS: The median overall survival time was 10.8 months, and 66.7% of patients died of disease progression. After HSRT treatment of 52 brain lesions, 13 lesions demonstrated complete responses, 12 lesions demonstrated partial responses, 22 lesions demonstrated stable disease, and 5 lesions demonstrated progressive disease. Actuarial local tumor control rates at 6 months and 1 year were 93.9% and 68.2%, respectively. Maximum tumor dimension, concurrent chemotherapy, and a tumor volume <1 cc were found to be statistically significant factors for local tumor control. One patient had a grade 3 toxicity (according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events). CONCLUSIONS: HSRT provides a high level of tumor control with minimal toxicity comparable to single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The results of the current study warrant a prospective randomized study comparing single-fraction SRS with HSRT in this patient population. (c) 2009 American Cancer Society.
Authors: Che-Chuan Wang; Scott R Floyd; Chin-Hong Chang; Peter C Warnke; Chung-Ching Chio; Ekkehard M Kasper; Anand Mahadevan; Eric T Wong; Clark C Chen Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2011-08-31 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Bree R Eaton; Michael J LaRiviere; Michael J La Riviere; Sungjin Kim; Roshan S Prabhu; Kirtesh Patel; Shravan Kandula; Nelson Oyesiku; Jeffrey Olson; Walter Curran; Hui-Kuo Shu; Ian Crocker Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2015-04-11 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: A Gabriella Wernicke; Menachem Z Yondorf; Luke Peng; Samuel Trichter; Lucy Nedialkova; Albert Sabbas; Fridon Kulidzhanov; Bhupesh Parashar; Dattatreyudu Nori; K S Clifford Chao; Paul Christos; Ilhami Kovanlikaya; Susan Pannullo; John A Boockvar; Philip E Stieg; Theodore H Schwartz Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2014-05-02 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Selvan Rajakesari; Nils D Arvold; Rachel B Jimenez; Laura W Christianson; Margaret C Horvath; Elizabeth B Claus; Alexandra J Golby; Mark D Johnson; Ian F Dunn; Eudocia Q Lee; Nancy U Lin; Scott Friesen; Edward G Mannarino; Matthew Wagar; Fred L Hacker; Stephanie E Weiss; Brian M Alexander Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2014-07-25 Impact factor: 4.130