Literature DB >> 22819579

Quantitative assessment of dynamic PET imaging data in cancer imaging.

Mark Muzi1, Finbarr O'Sullivan, David A Mankoff, Robert K Doot, Larry A Pierce, Brenda F Kurland, Hannah M Linden, Paul E Kinahan.   

Abstract

Clinical imaging in positron emission tomography (PET) is often performed using single-time-point estimates of tracer uptake or static imaging that provides a spatial map of regional tracer concentration. However, dynamic tracer imaging can provide considerably more information about in vivo biology by delineating both the temporal and spatial pattern of tracer uptake. In addition, several potential sources of error that occur in static imaging can be mitigated. This review focuses on the application of dynamic PET imaging to measuring regional cancer biologic features and especially in using dynamic PET imaging for quantitative therapeutic response monitoring for cancer clinical trials. Dynamic PET imaging output parameters, particularly transport (flow) and overall metabolic rate, have provided imaging end points for clinical trials at single-center institutions for years. However, dynamic imaging poses many challenges for multicenter clinical trial implementations from cross-center calibration to the inadequacy of a common informatics infrastructure. Underlying principles and methodology of PET dynamic imaging are first reviewed, followed by an examination of current approaches to dynamic PET image analysis with a specific case example of dynamic fluorothymidine imaging to illustrate the approach.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22819579      PMCID: PMC3466344          DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  44 in total

1.  Cluster analysis in kinetic modelling of the brain: a noninvasive alternative to arterial sampling.

Authors:  Matthew Liptrot; Karen H Adams; Lars Martiny; Lars H Pinborg; Markus N Lonsdale; Niels V Olsen; Søren Holm; Claus Svarer; Gitte M Knudsen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Instrumentation factors affecting variance and bias of quantifying tracer uptake with PET/CT.

Authors:  R K Doot; J S Scheuermann; P E Christian; J S Karp; P E Kinahan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Imaging radiotracer model parameters in PET: a mixture analysis approach.

Authors:  F O'Sullivan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Mapping of change in cerebral glucose utilization using fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose double injection and the constrained weighted-integration method.

Authors:  K Murase; H Kuwabara; Y Yasuhara; A C Evans; A Gjedde
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Kinetic analysis of 3'-deoxy-3'-18F-fluorothymidine in patients with gliomas.

Authors:  Mark Muzi; Alexander M Spence; Finbarr O'Sullivan; David A Mankoff; Joanne M Wells; John R Grierson; Jeanne M Link; Kenneth A Krohn
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Factor analysis for extraction of blood time-activity curves in dynamic FDG-PET studies.

Authors:  H M Wu; C K Hoh; Y Choi; H R Schelbert; R A Hawkins; M E Phelps; S C Huang
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Nonparametric Residue Analysis of Dynamic PET Data With Application to Cerebral FDG Studies in Normals.

Authors:  Finbarr O'Sullivan; Mark Muzi; Alexander M Spence; David M Mankoff; Janet N O'Sullivan; Niall Fitzgerald; George C Newman; Kenneth A Krohn
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 5.033

8.  Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study.

Authors:  Ronald Boellaard; Nanda C Krak; Otto S Hoekstra; Adriaan A Lammertsma
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Kinetic analysis of 2-[11C]thymidine PET imaging studies of malignant brain tumors: preliminary patient results.

Authors:  Joanne M Wells; David A Mankoff; Janet F Eary; Alexander M Spence; Mark Muzi; Finbarr O'Sullivan; Cheryl B Vernon; Jeanne M Link; Kenneth A Krohn
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.488

10.  Noninvasive quantitative fluorodeoxyglucose PET studies with an estimated input function derived from a population-based arterial blood curve.

Authors:  S Takikawa; V Dhawan; P Spetsieris; W Robeson; T Chaly; R Dahl; D Margouleff; D Eidelberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  33 in total

1.  VOXEL-LEVEL MAPPING OF TRACER KINETICS IN PET STUDIES: A STATISTICAL APPROACH EMPHASIZING TISSUE LIFE TABLES.

Authors:  Finbarr O'Sullivan; Mark Muzi; David A Mankoff; Janet F Eary; Alexander M Spence; Kenneth A Krohn
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 2.083

2.  A virtual clinical trial comparing static versus dynamic PET imaging in measuring response to breast cancer therapy.

Authors:  Kristen A Wangerin; Mark Muzi; Lanell M Peterson; Hannah M Linden; Alena Novakova; David A Mankoff; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3.  Imaging of site specific bone turnover in osteoporosis using positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Glen M Blake; Musib Siddique; Michelle L Frost; Amelia E B Moore; Ignac Fogelman
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Polymers for 3D Printing and Customized Additive Manufacturing.

Authors:  Samuel Clark Ligon; Robert Liska; Jürgen Stampfl; Matthias Gurr; Rolf Mülhaupt
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2017-07-30       Impact factor: 60.622

5.  Dynamic PET simulator via tomographic emission projection for kinetic modeling and parametric image studies.

Authors:  Ida Häggström; Bradley J Beattie; C Ross Schmidtlein
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 6.  Towards enhanced PET quantification in clinical oncology.

Authors:  Habib Zaidi; Nicolas Karakatsanis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Investigation of the influence of sampling schemes on quantitative dynamic fluorescence imaging.

Authors:  Yunpeng Dai; Xueli Chen; Jipeng Yin; Guodong Wang; Bo Wang; Yonghua Zhan; Yongzhan Nie; Kaichun Wu; Jimin Liang
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  Quantitative Evaluation of Tumor Early Response to a Vascular-Disrupting Agent with Dynamic PET.

Authors:  Ning Guo; Fan Zhang; Xiaomeng Zhang; Jinxia Guo; Lixin Lang; Dale O Kiesewetter; Gang Niu; Quanzheng Li; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  An analysis of whole body tracer kinetics in dynamic PET studies with application to image-based blood input function extraction.

Authors:  Jian Huang; Finbarr O'Sullivan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 10.  Site specific measurements of bone formation using [18F] sodium fluoride PET/CT.

Authors:  Glen M Blake; Tanuj Puri; Musib Siddique; Michelle L Frost; Amelia E B Moore; Ignac Fogelman
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.