Literature DB >> 29674808

Using an elastic magnifier to increase power output and performance of heart-beat harvesters.

Antonio C Galbier1, M Amin Karami2.   

Abstract

Embedded piezoelectric energy harvesting (PEH) systems in medical pacemakers have been a growing and innovative research area. The goal of these systems, at present, is to remove the pacemaker battery, which makes up 60%-80% of the unit, and replace it with a sustainable power source. This requires that energy harvesting systems provide sufficient power, 1-3 μW, for operating a pacemaker. The goal of this work is to develop, test, and simulate cantilevered energy harvesters with a linear elastic magnifier (LEM). This research hopes to provide insight into the interaction between pacemaker energy harvesters and the heart. By introducing the elastic magnifier into linear and nonlinear systems oscillations of the tip are encouraged into high energy orbits and large tip deflections. A continuous nonlinear model is presented for the bistable piezoelectric energy harvesting (BPEH) system and a one-degree-of-freedom linear mass-spring-damper model is presented for the elastic magnifier. The elastic magnifier will not consider the damping negligible, unlike most models. A physical model was created for the bistable structure and formed to an elastic magnifier. A hydrogel was designed for the experimental model for the LEM. Experimental results show that the BPEH coupled with a LEM (BPEH + LEM) produces more power at certain input frequencies and operates a larger bandwidth than a PEH, BPEH, and a standard piezoelectric energy harvester with the elastic magnifier (PEH + LEM). Numerical simulations are consistent with these results. It was observed that the system enters high-energy and high orbit oscillations and that, ultimately, BPEH systems implemented in medical pacemakers can, if designed properly, have enhanced performance if positioned over the heart.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bistable oscillator; cardiac pacemaker; elastic magnifier; energy harvester; medical device applications; piezoelectric

Year:  2017        PMID: 29674808      PMCID: PMC5903461          DOI: 10.1088/1361-665X/aa7d93

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Smart Mater Struct        ISSN: 0964-1726            Impact factor:   3.585


  10 in total

1.  Preparation of hydrogel substrates with tunable mechanical properties.

Authors:  Justin R Tse; Adam J Engler
Journal:  Curr Protoc Cell Biol       Date:  2010-06

2.  Leads and longevity: how long will your pacemaker last?

Authors:  Richard K Shepard; Kenneth A Ellenbogen
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 5.214

3.  Myocardial tissue elastic properties determined by atomic force microscopy after stromal cell-derived factor 1α angiogenic therapy for acute myocardial infarction in a murine model.

Authors:  William Hiesinger; Matthew J Brukman; Ryan C McCormick; J Raymond Fitzpatrick; John R Frederick; Elaine C Yang; Jeffrey R Muenzer; Nicole A Marotta; Mark F Berry; Pavan Atluri; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of myocardial elastic modulus and viscosity using displacement imaging and phase-contrast velocity mapping.

Authors:  Han Wen; Eric Bennett; Neal Epstein; Jonathan Plehn
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Actual pacemaker longevity: the benefit of stimulation by automatic capture verification.

Authors:  Mauro Biffi; Matteo Bertini; Davide Saporito; Matteo Ziacchi; Cristian Martignani; Igor Diemberger; Giuseppe Boriani
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 6.  [Pacemaker longevity. Replacement of the device].

Authors:  J C Deharo; P Djiane
Journal:  Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris)       Date:  2005-01

7.  A randomized trial of the effect of automated ventricular capture on device longevity and threshold measurement in pacemaker patients.

Authors:  Bruce A Koplan; David M Gilligan; Luc S Nguyen; Theodore K Lau; Lisa M Thackeray; Kellie Chase Berg
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.976

8.  Pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators: device longevity is more important than smaller size: the patient's viewpoint.

Authors:  David M Wild; John D Fisher; Soo G Kim; Kevin J Ferrick; Jay N Gross; Eugen C Palma
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.976

9.  Piezoelectric energy harvesting solutions.

Authors:  Renato Caliò; Udaya Bhaskar Rongala; Domenico Camboni; Mario Milazzo; Cesare Stefanini; Gianluca de Petris; Calogero Maria Oddo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 10.  Power Approaches for Implantable Medical Devices.

Authors:  Achraf Ben Amar; Ammar B Kouki; Hung Cao
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 3.576

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.