| Literature DB >> 29673366 |
Hana Buchtelova1, Vladislav Strmiska1, Zuzana Skubalova1, Simona Dostalova1,2, Petr Michalek1,2, Sona Krizkova1,2, David Hynek1,2, Lukas Kalina3, Lukas Richtera1,2, Amitava Moulick1,2, Vojtech Adam1,2, Zbynek Heger4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Suitable fluorophores are the core of fluorescence imaging. Among the most exciting, yet controversial, labels are quantum dots (QDs) with their unique optical and chemical properties, but also considerable toxicity. This hinders QDs applicability in living systems. Surface chemistry has a profound impact on biological behavior of QDs. This study describes a two-step synthesis of QDs formed by CdTe core doped with Schiff base ligand for lanthanides [Ln (Yb3+, Tb3+ and Gd3+)] as novel cytocompatible fluorophores.Entities:
Keywords: Cellular labeling; Cytotoxicity; Inorganic fluorophore; Nanocrystal; Surface dopant
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29673366 PMCID: PMC5907456 DOI: 10.1186/s12951-018-0369-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nanobiotechnology ISSN: 1477-3155 Impact factor: 10.435
Fig. 1Characterization of Ln-doped QDs. a Photodocumentation of a colloidal stability of QDs showing their stability without sedimentation at start-point (0 h) and upon 7 days of storage at 25 °C in RS. b Corresponding size distribution histograms analyzed by quasielastic DLS. Inserted are ζ-potential values analyzed in RS 100-fold diluted with Milli-Q water (pH 7.4) by Doppler microelectrophoresis. c TEM micrographs with the length of scale bar 50 nm. d XPS survey spectra and e FT-IR spectra of Ln-doped QDs and individual components used for synthesis. f Photographs of Ln-doped QDs in ambient light and after exposure to UV transillumination (λexc = 312 nm). Inserted are QY values determined using rhodamine 6G as a reference
Fig. 2a Fluorescence stability of Ln-doped QDs incubated (up to 48 h) in solutions mimicking distinct physiological environments. RS Ringer’s solution, EE endosomal environment, NIE neutral intracellular environment. b 2D fluorescence emission–excitation spectral maps of Ln-doped QDs obtained upon incubation (48 h) in various solutions mimicking physiological conditions (plasma, endosomes and cytoplasm). Spectra illustrate environment-dependent optima for excitation and emission. Red spots highlight maximum performance of fluorescence, blue spots—no or negligible fluorescence recorded
Time-course development of HDD (nm) of Ln-doped QDs incubated in RS, EE and NIE
| YbQDs | TbQDs | GdQDs | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 0 h | 5.4 | 5.5 | 5.4 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 3.1 |
| 1 h | 5.6 | 5.2 | 5.9 | 4.3 | 4.7 | 4.8 | 3.4 | 3.5 | 3.8 |
| 6 h | 5.4 | 5.9 | 6.2 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 5.3 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 4.2 |
| 12 h | 5.8 | 5.5 | 6.9 | 4.2 | 4.5 | 5.5 | 3.7 | 3.4 | 4.1 |
| 24 h | 5.6 | 5.4 | 7.2 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 6.2 | 3.5 | 3.6 | 5.2 |
| 48 h | 5.9 | 5.6 | 8.0 | 5.1 | 4.6 | 6.0 | 3.6 | 3.7 | 6.9 |
The results are expressed as mean HDD (nm) of three independent analyses
Fig. 3a Cytotoxicity assays showing viability of tested neuroblastoma cells after incubation with Ln-doped QDs (0.001–1 mM, 24 h). b MTT assay of green CdTe QDs illustrating their pronounced cytotoxicity in comparison to Ln-doped QDs. Inserted are basic characteristics of CdTe and image depicting their endocytosis (red, 10,000 MW pHrodo Red) in UKF-NB-4 cells. Scale bar, 20 μm. Red line indicates approximate 24IC50 values. The values are expressed as the mean of six independent replicates (n = 6). Vertical bars indicate standard error. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 related to control non-treated cells. c Living cells fluorescence microscopy showing Ln-doped QDs-induced endocytosis (10,000 MW pHrodo Green). Scale bars, 200 μm. BF bright field image. d Cytoplasmic accumulation of YbQDs and TbQDs in UKF-NB-4 cells. Scale bars, 40 μm. In all microscopic analyses, nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33342. Prior to microscopy, cells were incubated with 2 μM QDs for 6 h
Fig. 4a Representative ambient photographs showing the effects of Ln-doped QDs on a migration of neuroblastoma cells. Photographs illustrate artificial wound at the experimental start-point (0 h) and migration of the cells after 12 h. Scale bar, 400 μm. b Bar graph demonstrating percentual migration rates. The values are expressed as the mean of six independent replicates (n = 6). Vertical bars indicate standard error. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 related to control non-treated cells. c Living cells fluorescence microscopy illustrating ROS (CellRox, green) formation in cells exposed to Ln-doped QDs (2 μM QDs for 3 h). Nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33342. Scale bars, 100 μm. BF bright field image
Fig. 5a Hemocompatibility of Ln-doped QDs assayed on human RBCs. PBS (pH 7.4) and 0.1% Triton X-100 were utilized as negative and positive controls, respectively. Images on the right side show representative photographs of exposed samples. The values are expressed as the mean of three independent replicates (n = 3). b Protein corona profiles obtained after 30 min incubation of Ln-doped QDs, with human plasma followed by extensive washing, elution and loading onto 12% SDS-PAGE. MW weight marker. c Proteins were further quantified by densitometric analysis. d Representative SCGE fluorescence micrographs showing negligible genotoxicity induced by Ln-doped QDs (2 μM, 24 h) in neuroblastoma cells, negative control [PBS (pH 7.4)], positive control (150 µM H2O2). Bar graphs below depict quantitation of index of damage (comet grades). Scale bar, 50 μm. The values are expressed as the mean of three independent replicates (n = 3). Vertical bars indicate standard error. e Immunoblots of whole-cell lysates showing regulatory effects of Ln-doped QDs on expression of selected proteins
Fig. 6a Schematic depiction of a facile preparation of hNET-targeting Ln-doped QDs using cysteine-functionalized heptapeptide derived from immunoglobulin binding protein A for site-directed conjugation of anti-hNET antibodies. b Recovery of peptide linker binding onto surface of Ln-doped QDs. The values are expressed as the mean of three independent replicates (n = 3). Vertical bars indicate standard error. c SDS-PAGE showing components eluted from Ln-doped QDs. MW, weight marker. d Emission spectra of prepared constructs using λexc = 360 nm. Inserted are photographs of constructs after exposure to UV transillumination (λ = 312 nm). e TEM micrograph of anti-hNET@TbQDs. Scale bar, 100 nm. f Size distribution histogram of anti-hNET@TbQDs analysed by quasielastic DLS. Inserted is ζ-potential value analyzed in RS 100-fold diluted with Milli-Q water (pH 7.4) by Doppler microelectrophoresis. g Immunoblots of whole-cell lysates showing expression of hNET in four distinct cell lines. h Living cells fluorescence microscopy illustrating specific accumulation of anti-hNET@TbQDs (1 μM QDs upon 24 h incubation) on a surface of SH-SY5Y cells. Nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33342. Scale bars, 20 μm. i Immunoblots of whole-cell lysates showing stimulation of hNET in SH-SY5Y by SAHA. j Living cells fluorescence microscopy illustrating anti-hNET@TbQDs accumulation associated with SAHA-stimulated hNET expression. Nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33342. Scale bars, 20 μm