Literature DB >> 23879393

Cytotoxicity of quantum dots used for in vitro cellular labeling: role of QD surface ligand, delivery modality, cell type, and direct comparison to organic fluorophores.

Christopher E Bradburne1, James B Delehanty, Kelly Boeneman Gemmill, Bing C Mei, Hedi Mattoussi, Kimihiro Susumu, Juan B Blanco-Canosa, Philip E Dawson, Igor L Medintz.   

Abstract

Interest in taking advantage of the unique spectral properties of semiconductor quantum dots (QDs) has driven their widespread use in biological applications such as in vitro cellular labeling/imaging and sensing. Despite their demonstrated utility, concerns over the potential toxic effects of QD core materials on cellular proliferation and homeostasis have persisted, leaving in question the suitability of QDs as alternatives for more traditional fluorescent materials (e.g., organic dyes, fluorescent proteins) for in vitro cellular applications. Surprisingly, direct comparative studies examining the cytotoxic potential of QDs versus these more traditional cellular labeling fluorophores remain limited. Here, using CdSe/ZnS (core/shell) QDs as a prototypical assay material, we present a comprehensive study in which we characterize the influence of QD dose (concentration and incubation time), QD surface capping ligand, and delivery modality (peptide or cationic amphiphile transfection reagent) on cellular viability in three human cell lines representing various morphological lineages (epithelial, endothelial, monocytic). We further compare the effects of QD cellular labeling on cellular proliferation relative to those associated with a panel of traditionally employed organic cell labeling fluorophores that span a broad spectral range. Our results demonstrate the important role played by QD dose, capping ligand structure, and delivery agent in modulating cellular toxicity. Further, the results show that at the concentrations and time regimes required for robust QD-based cellular labeling, the impact of our in-house synthesized QD materials on cellular proliferation is comparable to that of six commercial cell labeling fluorophores. Cumulatively, our results demonstrate that the proper tuning of QD dose, surface ligand, and delivery modality can provide robust in vitro cell labeling reagents that exhibit minimal impact on cellular viability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23879393     DOI: 10.1021/bc4001917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioconjug Chem        ISSN: 1043-1802            Impact factor:   4.774


  18 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of cellular toxicity for cadmium-containing quantum dots.

Authors:  Eunkeu Oh; Rong Liu; Andre Nel; Kelly Boeneman Gemill; Muhammad Bilal; Yoram Cohen; Igor L Medintz
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 39.213

Review 2.  Carbon Quantum Dots: Synthesis, Characterization and Biomedical Applications.

Authors:  Inderbir Singh; Riya Arora; Hardik Dhiman; Rakesh Pahwa
Journal:  Turk J Pharm Sci       Date:  2018-07-17

3.  Sequential, low-temperature aqueous synthesis of Ag-In-S/Zn quantum dots via staged cation exchange under biomineralization conditions.

Authors:  Nur Koncuy Ozdemir; Joseph P Cline; John Sakizadeh; Shannon M Collins; Angela C Brown; Steven McIntosh; Christopher J Kiely; Mark A Snyder
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 7.571

4.  Quantum Dot-Peptide-Fullerene Bioconjugates for Visualization of in Vitro and in Vivo Cellular Membrane Potential.

Authors:  Okhil K Nag; Michael H Stewart; Jeffrey R Deschamps; Kimihiro Susumu; Eunkeu Oh; Vassiliy Tsytsarev; Qinggong Tang; Alexander L Efros; Roman Vaxenburg; Bryan J Black; YungChia Chen; Thomas J O'Shaughnessy; Stella H North; Lauren D Field; Philip E Dawson; Joseph J Pancrazio; Igor L Medintz; Yu Chen; Reha S Erzurumlu; Alan L Huston; James B Delehanty
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 15.881

5.  Preparation and Characterization of Quantum Dot-Peptide Conjugates Based on Polyhistidine Tags.

Authors:  Katherine D Krause; Hsin-Yun Tsai; Kelly Rees; Hyungki Kim; W Russ Algar
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

6.  Subcellular Targeted Nanohoop for One- and Two-Photon Live Cell Imaging.

Authors:  Terri C Lovell; Sarah G Bolton; John P Kenison; Julia Shangguan; Claire E Otteson; Fehmi Civitci; Xiaolin Nan; Michael D Pluth; Ramesh Jasti
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 18.027

7.  Novel polythiophene derivative for dual-channel cell imaging.

Authors:  Fengyan Wang; Huiyun Xia; Siyu Pu; Ni Yan; Jiale Song; Yefei Tian; Junji Wei; Luke Yan
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 4.036

Review 8.  Continuing progress toward controlled intracellular delivery of semiconductor quantum dots.

Authors:  Joyce Breger; James B Delehanty; Igor L Medintz
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2014-08-26

9.  The Role of Negative Charge in the Delivery of Quantum Dots to Neurons.

Authors:  Ryan Walters; Igor L Medintz; James B Delehanty; Michael H Stewart; Kimihiro Susumu; Alan L Huston; Philip E Dawson; Glyn Dawson
Journal:  ASN Neuro       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 4.146

Review 10.  In vitro interaction of colloidal nanoparticles with mammalian cells: What have we learned thus far?

Authors:  Moritz Nazarenus; Qian Zhang; Mahmoud G Soliman; Pablo Del Pino; Beatriz Pelaz; Susana Carregal-Romero; Joanna Rejman; Barbara Rothen-Rutishauser; Martin J D Clift; Reinhard Zellner; G Ulrich Nienhaus; James B Delehanty; Igor L Medintz; Wolfgang J Parak
Journal:  Beilstein J Nanotechnol       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 3.649

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.