| Literature DB >> 29673313 |
Diana Delicado1,2, Torsten Hauffe3, Thomas Wilke3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Differences in species richness among phylogenetic clades are attributed to clade age and/or variation in diversification rates. Access to ecological opportunity may trigger a temporary increase in diversification rates and ecomorphological variation. In addition, lower body temperatures in poikilothermic animals may result in decreasing speciation rates as proposed by the metabolic theory of ecology. For strictly freshwater organisms, environmental gradients within a river continuum, linked to elevation and temperature, might promote access to ecological opportunity and alter metabolic rates, eventually influencing speciation and extinction processes. To test these hypotheses, we investigated the influence of environmental temperature and elevation, as proxies for body temperature and ecological opportunity, respectively, on speciation rates and ecomorphological divergence. As model systems served two closely related gastropod genera with unequal species richness and habitat preferences - Pseudamnicola and Corrosella.Entities:
Keywords: Corrosella; Disparity-through-time plots; Ecomorphological divergence; Elevational gradients; Hydrobiidae; Pseudamnicola; Speciation rate
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29673313 PMCID: PMC5907725 DOI: 10.1186/s12862-018-1169-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Fig. 1Speciation dynamics in the genera Corrosella and Pseudamnicola. (a) Maximum clade credibility tree computed in *BEAST with branch lengths proportional to relative time. Tips represent the species to which individuals were assigned. Species names in parentheses refer to the previous species assignments made in Delicado et al. [22]. Black dots on nodes indicate branches supported by BPP < 0.9. For the phylorate plot, branches were color-coded according to modeled speciation rates. Three categories of shell shapes were identified (shell figures), according to shell length / shell width ratios of 0.4–0.8, 0.9–1.3, and 1.4–1.9. (b) Linage-through-time plots of the MCC tree (solid lines) and the 95% confidence interval based on 1000 post-burn-in trees (dashed lines) are shown for each genus separately
Fig. 2Relationship between elevation and speciation rates in the genera Corrosella and Pseudamnicola. A joint QuaSSE modeling of elevational evolution along the phylogeny and its influence on speciation revealed a decreasing speciation rate in Pseudamnicola with increasing elevation. We calculated the 95% highest posterior density (dashed lines) of speciation rates by Bayesian inference. Vertical ticks on the x-axis indicate elevation of extant species. Note that for model assumptions of normality, we took the square root of elevation. The back-transformation caused the non-linear impression of the plot
Fig. 3Ecomorphological disparity in the genera Corrosella and Pseudamnicola. (a) Morphological and elevational disparity-through-time plots displayed for Corrosella and Pseudamnicola. The black solid line indicates the observed disparity. The dashed line and gray area represent the mean and 95% confidence interval, respectively, of the expected disparity under a null model of morphological or elevational evolution along the phylogeny. (b) Estimation of ancestral habitat type through relative time performed in BioGeoBEARS for Pseudamnicola and Corrosella
Models of ancestral habitat evolution for Corrosella and Pseudamnicola species fitted by maximum likelihood in BioGeoBEARS
| Model | P | D | E | J | ΔAICc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DEC + J | 3 | 0.390 | ~ 0 | 0.006 | 0 |
| DEC | 2 | 0.428 | 0.272 | – | 1.01 |
| BayArealike | 2 | 0.622 | 0.750 | – | 5.68 |
| BayArealike+J | 3 | 0.392 | ~ 0 | 0.009 | 6.98 |
| DIVAlike+J | 3 | 0.415 | ~ 0 | 0.006 | 8.67 |
| DIVAlike | 2 | 0.467 | 0.047 | – | 13.54 |
Shown are the number of model parameters (P) and coefficients for range expansion (dispersal, D), contraction (extinction, E), and founder events (jump, j). Coefficients based on our phylogeny should not be compared with other studies because of our relative time calibration. Extinction coefficients of approximately zero indicate estimates at parameter bound of the model. We ranked the models according to the difference of model-fit in comparison to the best model (ΔAICc). The two best models do not differ substantially in their support (ΔAICc < 2) and showed similar ancestral habitat estimates