Literature DB >> 29672836

Pathogenic and targetable genetic alterations in 70 urachal adenocarcinomas.

Henning Reis1,2, Kristan E van der Vos3, Christian Niedworok4, Thomas Herold1,2, Orsolya Módos5, Attila Szendrői5, Thomas Hager1, Marc Ingenwerth1, Daniël J Vis3, Mark A Behrendt6,7, Jeroen de Jong8, Michiel S van der Heijden3,9, Benoit Peyronnet10, Romain Mathieu10, Marcel Wiesweg11, Jason Ablat12, Krzysztof Okon13, Yuri Tolkach14, David Keresztes5, Nikolett Nagy5, Felix Bremmer15, Nadine T Gaisa16, Piotr Chlosta13, Joerg Kriegsmann17, Ilona Kovalszky18, József Timar19, Glen Kristiansen14, Heinz-Joachim Radzun15, Ruth Knüchel16, Martin Schuler2,11, Peter C Black12, Herbert Rübben4, Boris A Hadaschik4,2, Kurt Werner Schmid1,2, Bas W G van Rhijn6, Péter Nyirády5, Tibor Szarvas4,5.   

Abstract

Urachal cancer (UrC) is a rare but aggressive malignancy often diagnosed in advanced stages requiring systemic treatment. Although cytotoxic chemotherapy is of limited effectiveness, prospective clinical studies can hardly be conducted. Targeted therapeutic treatment approaches and potentially immunotherapy based on a biological rationale may provide an alternative strategy. We therefore subjected 70 urachal adenocarcinomas to targeted next-generation sequencing, conducted in situ and immunohistochemical analyses (including PD-L1 and DNA mismatch repair proteins [MMR]) and evaluated the microsatellite instability (MSI) status. The analytical findings were correlated with clinicopathological and outcome data and Kaplan-Meier and univariable/multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed. The patients had a mean age of 50 years, 66% were male and a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 58% and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of 45% was detected. Sequence variations were observed in TP53 (66%), KRAS (21%), BRAF (4%), PIK3CA (4%), FGFR1 (1%), MET (1%), NRAS (1%), and PDGFRA (1%). Gene amplifications were found in EGFR (5%), ERBB2 (2%), and MET (2%). We detected no evidence of MMR-deficiency (MMR-d)/MSI-high (MSI-h), whereas 10 of 63 cases (16%) expressed PD-L1. Therefore, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy approaches might be tested in UrC. Importantly, we found aberrations in intracellular signal transduction pathways (RAS/RAF/PI3K) in 31% of UrCs with potential implications for anti-EGFR therapy. Less frequent potentially actionable genetic alterations were additionally detected in ERBB2 (HER2), MET, FGFR1, and PDGFRA. The molecular profile strengthens the notion that UrC is a distinct entity on the genomic level with closer resemblance to colorectal than to bladder cancer.
© 2018 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colorectal cancer; molecular genetics; targeted therapy; urachal cancer; urothelial carcinoma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29672836     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  14 in total

Review 1.  Genomic Subtyping in Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Tuomas Jalanko; Joep J de Jong; Ewan A Gibb; Roland Seiler; Peter C Black
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  [Urachal Cancer: an update of current molecular findings].

Authors:  H Reis; F Mairinger; S Ting; N Nagy; K E Witzke; M Kohl; B Sitek; C Niedworok; B Hadaschik; P Nyirády; T Szarvas
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  Clinical, Pathological, and Prognostic Analysis of Urachal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Guangjun Shao; Chunru Xu; Jikai Liu; Xuesong Li; Luchao Li; Xiaofeng Li; Xiaoqing Zhang; Yidong Fan; Liqun Zhou
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Distinct Gene Mutations Are Associated With Clinicopathologic Features in Urachal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Michael P Zaleski; Hui Chen; Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri; Keyur P Patel; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Mark J Routbort; Ashish M Kamat; Jianjun Gao; Arlene Siefker-Radtke; Bogdan Czerniak; Charles C Guo
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 5.400

5.  Molecular profiling of clear cell adenocarcinoma of the urinary tract.

Authors:  Chieh-Yu Lin; Atif Saleem; Henning Stehr; James L Zehnder; Benjamin A Pinsky; Christian A Kunder
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Ex vivo modelling of drug efficacy in a rare metastatic urachal carcinoma.

Authors:  Rami Mäkelä; Antti Arjonen; Ville Härmä; Nina Rintanen; Lauri Paasonen; Tobias Paprotka; Kerstin Rönsch; Teijo Kuopio; Juha Kononen; Juha K Rantala
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Successful treatment of locally advanced urachal adenocarcinoma with peri-operative gemcitabine - cisplatin combination therapy: a case report and perspective on targeted therapies.

Authors:  Ioannis A Voutsadakis
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2020-11-20

Review 8.  Genomic heterogeneity in bladder cancer: challenges and possible solutions to improve outcomes.

Authors:  Joshua J Meeks; Hikmat Al-Ahmadie; Bishoy M Faltas; John A Taylor; Thomas W Flaig; David J DeGraff; Emil Christensen; Benjamin L Woolbright; David J McConkey; Lars Dyrskjøt
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  Prevalence of APC and PTEN Alterations in Urachal Cancer.

Authors:  Nikolett Nagy; Henning Reis; Boris Hadaschik; Christian Niedworok; Orsolya Módos; Attila Szendrői; Krisztina Bíró; Thomas Hager; Thomas Herold; Jason Ablat; Peter C Black; Krzysztof Okon; Yuri Tolkach; Anita Csizmarik; Csilla Oláh; David Keresztes; Felix Bremmer; Nadine T Gaisa; Joerg Kriegsmann; Ilona Kovalszky; András Kiss; József Tímár; Marcell A Szász; Michael Rink; Margit Fisch; Péter Nyirády; Tibor Szarvas
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 3.201

10.  Gene network screening of bladder cancer via modular analysis.

Authors:  Xiaodong Li; Ye Wu; Ye Yuan
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.