Literature DB >> 29672400

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Pathway in Esophagectomy: Is a Reasonable Prediction of Hospital Stay Possible?

Paolo Parise1, Carlo Ferrari1, Andrea Cossu1, Francesco Puccetti1, Ugo Elmore1, Stefano De Pascale2, Leonardo Garutti1, Uberto Romario Fumagalli2, Mariaclelia Stefania Di Serio3, Riccardo Rosati4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether perioperative variables or deviation from enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) items could be associated with delayed discharge after esophagectomy, and to convert them into a scoring system to predict it. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: ERAS perioperative pathways have been recently applied to esophageal resections. However, low adherence to ERAS items and high rates of protocol deviations are often reported.
METHODS: All patients who underwent esophagectomy between April 2012 and March 2017 were managed with a standardized perioperative pathway according to ERAS principles. The target length of stay was set at eighth postoperative day (POD). All significant variables at bivariate analysis were entered into a logistic regression to produce a predictive score. An initial validation of the score accuracy was carried out on a separate patient sample.
RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-six patients were included in the study. Multivariate regression analysis showed that American Society of Anesthesiology score ≥ 3, surgery duration > 255 min, "nonhybrid" esophagectomy, and failure to mobilize patients within 24 h from surgery were associated with delayed discharge. The logistic regression model was statistically significant (P < 0.001) and correctly classified 81.9% of cases. The sensitivity was 96.6%, and the specificity was 17.6%. The prediction score applied to 23 patients correctly identified 100% of those discharged after eighth POD.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study seem to be clinically meaningful and in line with those from other studies. The initial validation revealed good predictive properties.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 29672400     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  13 in total

1.  Enhanced recovery after surgery in colon and rectal surgery: identification of predictive variables of failure in a monocentric series including 733 patients.

Authors:  Andrea Vignali; Ugo Elmore; Giovanni Guarneri; Valentino De Ruvo; Paolo Parise; Riccardo Rosati
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-07-08

2.  A successful clinical pathway protocol for minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Robert E Merritt; Peter J Kneuertz; Desmond M D'Souza; Kyle A Perry
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  International Variation in Surgical Practices in Units Performing Oesophagectomy for Oesophageal Cancer: A Unit Survey from the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA).

Authors: 
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  State of the art of enhance recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in esophagogastric cancer surgery: the Western experience.

Authors:  Silvia Salvans; Luis Grande; Mariagiulia Dal Cero; Manuel Pera
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-06-21

5.  The effect of enhanced recovery after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yaxing Shen; Xiaosang Chen; Junyi Hou; Youwen Chen; Yong Fang; Zhanggang Xue; Xavier Benoit D'Journo; Robert J Cerfolio; Hiran C Fernando; Alfonso Fiorelli; Alessandro Brunelli; Jing Cang; Lijie Tan; Hao Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Routine Radiologic Assessment for Anastomotic Leak Is Not Necessary in Asymptomatic Patients After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Hansol Kang; Kfir Ben-David; George A Sarosi; Ryan M Thomas
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  Application of ERAS protocols in esophagogastric emergency surgery: is it feasible and does it make sense?

Authors:  Francesco Puccetti; Ugo Elmore; Riccardo Rosati
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-08-31

8.  Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Impact on the Systemic Inflammatory Response of Patients Following Gynecological Oncology Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Study.

Authors:  Jin Peng; Ruiying Dong; Jianfen Jiao; Min Liu; Xi Zhang; Hualei Bu; Ping Dong; Shasha Zhao; Naidong Xing; Shuai Feng; Xingsheng Yang; Beihua Kong
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.989

9.  [Perioperative enhanced recovery after surgery program for Ivor Lewis esophagectomy : First experiences of a high-volume center].

Authors:  C Mallmann; H Drinhaus; H Fuchs; L M Schiffmann; C Cleff; E Schönau; C J Bruns; T Annecke; W Schröder
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 0.955

10.  How Much Benefit Can Patients Acquire from Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols with Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion?

Authors:  Junfeng Gong; Liwen Luo; Huan Liu; Changqing Li; Yu Tang; Yue Zhou
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-07-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.