OBJECTIVE: Conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of the Fuel Your Life (FYL) program dissemination. METHODS: Employees were recruited from three workplaces randomly assigned to one of the conditions: telephone coaching, small group coaching, and self-study. Costs were collected prospectively during the efficacy trial. The main outcome measures of interest were weight loss and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). RESULTS: The phone condition was most costly ($601 to $589/employee) and the self-study condition was least costly ($145 to $143/employee). For weight loss, delivering FYL through the small group condition was no more effective, yet more expensive, than the self-study delivery. For QALYs, the group delivery of FYL was in an acceptable cost-effectiveness range ($22,400/QALY) relative to self-study (95% confidence interval [CI]: $10,600/QALY-dominated). CONCLUSIONS: Prevention programs require adaptation at the local level and significantly affect the cost, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of the program.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of the Fuel Your Life (FYL) program dissemination. METHODS: Employees were recruited from three workplaces randomly assigned to one of the conditions: telephone coaching, small group coaching, and self-study. Costs were collected prospectively during the efficacy trial. The main outcome measures of interest were weight loss and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). RESULTS: The phone condition was most costly ($601 to $589/employee) and the self-study condition was least costly ($145 to $143/employee). For weight loss, delivering FYL through the small group condition was no more effective, yet more expensive, than the self-study delivery. For QALYs, the group delivery of FYL was in an acceptable cost-effectiveness range ($22,400/QALY) relative to self-study (95% confidence interval [CI]: $10,600/QALY-dominated). CONCLUSIONS: Prevention programs require adaptation at the local level and significantly affect the cost, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of the program.
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Catherine Barber; Arne Beck; Patricia Berglund; Paul D Cleary; David McKenas; Nico Pronk; Gregory Simon; Paul Stang; T Bedirhan Ustun; Phillip Wang Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Laurie M Anderson; Toby A Quinn; Karen Glanz; Gilbert Ramirez; Leila C Kahwati; Donna B Johnson; Leigh Ramsey Buchanan; W Roodly Archer; Sajal Chattopadhyay; Geetika P Kalra; David L Katz Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Richard T Meenan; Barbara J Walkosz; David B Buller; Rachel Eye; Mary K Buller; Allan D Wallis; Savanna Olivas Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Roy Valenzuela; Stefan Saadiq; Sandra Cobos; Jennifer J Salinas Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-15 Impact factor: 4.614