Literature DB >> 20528406

Assessing cost-effectiveness in healthcare: history of the $50,000 per QALY threshold.

Scott D Grosse1.   

Abstract

Cost-effectiveness analyses, particularly in the USA, commonly use a figure of $50,000 per life-year or quality-adjusted life-year gained as a threshold for assessing the cost-effectiveness of an intervention. The history of this practice is ill defined, although it has been linked to the end-stage renal disease kidney dialysis cost-effectiveness literature from the 1980s. The use of $50,000 as a benchmark for assessing the cost-effectiveness of an intervention first emerged in 1992 and became widely used after 1996. The appeal of the $50,000 figure appears to lie in the convenience of a round number rather than in the value of renal dialysis. Rather than arbitrary thresholds, estimates of willingness to pay and the opportunity cost of healthcare resources are needed.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 20528406     DOI: 10.1586/14737167.8.2.165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res        ISSN: 1473-7167            Impact factor:   2.217


  199 in total

1.  Use of economic evaluation in decision making: evidence and recommendations for improvement.

Authors:  Steven Simoens
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Cost-effectiveness of adding an agent that improves immune responses to initial antiretroviral therapy (ART) in HIV-infected patients: guidance for drug development.

Authors:  Bethany L Morris; Callie A Scott; Timothy J Wilkin; Paul E Sax; Roy M Gulick; Kenneth A Freedberg; Bruce R Schackman
Journal:  HIV Clin Trials       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb

3.  The Irish Cost-Effectiveness Threshold: Does it Support Rational Rationing or Might it Lead to Unintended Harm to Ireland's Health System?

Authors:  James F O'Mahony; Diarmuid Coughlan
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  A Critical Look at the Efficacy and Costs of Biologic Therapy for Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyposis.

Authors:  W Colby Brown; Brent Senior
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 4.806

5.  Cost-effectiveness of MR Imaging-guided Strategies for Detection of Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men.

Authors:  Shivani Pahwa; Nicholas K Schiltz; Lee E Ponsky; Ziang Lu; Mark A Griswold; Vikas Gulani
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  A cost-effectiveness analysis of the first federally funded antismoking campaign.

Authors:  Xin Xu; Robert L Alexander; Sean A Simpson; Scott Goates; James M Nonnemaker; Kevin C Davis; Tim McAfee
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Cost-effectiveness of helicopter versus ground emergency medical services for trauma scene transport in the United States.

Authors:  M Kit Delgado; Kristan L Staudenmayer; N Ewen Wang; David A Spain; Sharada Weir; Douglas K Owens; Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 5.721

8.  The cost-effectiveness of screening men who have sex with men for rectal chlamydial and gonococcal infection to prevent HIV Infection.

Authors:  Harrell W Chesson; Kyle T Bernstein; Thomas L Gift; Julia L Marcus; Sharon Pipkin; Charlotte K Kent
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.830

9.  Willingness to pay for a QALY based on community member and patient preferences for temporary health states associated with herpes zoster.

Authors:  Tracy A Lieu; G Thomas Ray; Ismael R Ortega-Sanchez; Ken Kleinman; Donna Rusinak; Lisa A Prosser
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Personalized medicine and genomics: challenges and opportunities in assessing effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and future research priorities.

Authors:  Rena Conti; David L Veenstra; Katrina Armstrong; Lawrence J Lesko; Scott D Grosse
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 2.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.