| Literature DB >> 29671780 |
Caiping Yin1,2, Liping Jin3, Feifei Sun4, Xiao Xu5, Mingwei Shao6, Yinglao Zhang7,8.
Abstract
Four metabolites (1⁻4), including a new macrolide, O-demethylated-zeaenol (2), and three known compounds, zeaenol (1), adenosine (3), and ergosta-5,7,22-trien-3b-ol (4) were isolated and purified from Curvularia crepinii QTYC-1, a fungus residing in the gut of Pantala flavescens. The structures of isolated compounds were identified on the basis of extensive spectroscopic analysis and by comparison of the corresponding data with those reported in the literature previously. The new compound 2 showed good phytotoxic activity against Echinochloa crusgalli with an IC50 value of less than 5 µg/mL, which was comparable to that of positive 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D). Compound 1 exhibited moderate herbicidal activity against E. crusgalli with an IC50 value of 28.8 μg/mL. Furthermore, the new metabolite 2 was found to possess moderate antifungal activity against Valsa mali at the concentration of 100 µg/mL, with the inhibition rate of 50%. These results suggest that the new macrolide 2 and the known compound 1 have potential to be used as biocontrol agents in agriculture.Entities:
Keywords: Curvularia crepinii; Pantala flavescens; antifungal activity; macrolide; natural product; phytotoxic activity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29671780 PMCID: PMC6017354 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23040951
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1The phylogenetic tree of QTYC-1 based on the 5.8S rDNA sequences.
Figure 2Chemical structures of secondary metabolites 1–4 of C. crepinii QTYC-1.
1H-NMR and 13C-NMR data of compound 2 in acetone-d6.
| Position | δH, Mult. ( | δC |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 172.4 | |
| 2 | ||
| 3 | 5.32, m | 72.7 |
| 4a | 2.54, m | 38.0 |
| 4b | ||
| 5 | 5.99, m | 127.9 |
| 6 | 5.70, dd (15.4, 7.3) | 133.2 |
| 7 | 4.15, t ( 7.3, 7.6) | 73.7 |
| 8 | 3.50, d (7.6) | 78.9 |
| 9 | 3.78, m | 74.2 |
| 10 a | 2.33, s | 37.1 |
| 10 b | 2.45, m | |
| 11 | 5.99, m | 131.4 |
| 12 | 7.15, d (15.6) | 133.5 |
| 13 | 144.8 | |
| 14 | 6.45, d (2.4) | 108.6 |
| 15 | 163.4 | |
| 16 | 6.27, d (2.4) | 102.6 |
| 17 | 166.3 | |
| 18 | 103.8 | |
| 19 | 1.47, d (6.2) | 19.5 |
| 7-OH | 3.93, d (2.3) | |
| 8-OH | 3.96, d (3.0) | |
| 9-OH | 3.80, s | |
| 15-OH | 9.37, s | |
| 17-OH | 11.89, s |
Figure 3The phytotoxic effects of compounds 1–4 on radicle growth of E. crusgalli and A. retroflexus.
Figure 4The phytotoxic effects of compounds 1 and 2 with different concentrations on radicle growth of E. crusgalli.
Inhibition rate of the compounds of QTYC-1 against phytopathogenic fungi (in %) a.
| Phytopathogens | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Cycloheximide b |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 30.4 ± 0.6 | 50.0 ± 0.6 | NI | 28.9 ± 0.3 | 100 ± 0.0 |
|
| NI | NI | NI | NI | 99.7 ± 1.6 |
|
| 29.5 ± 0.1 | 30.4 ± 0.1 | 28.4 ± 0.1 | NI | 99.0 ± 0.3 |
|
| 20.1 ± 0.1 | 35.2 ± 0.1 | 4.4 ± 0.1 | 16.4 ± 0.1 | 98.2 ± 2.7 |
| 41.1 ± 0.1 | 42.2 ± 0.1 | 31.3 ± 0.0 | 7.5 ± 0.1 | 98.7 ± 0.6 |
a The concentration of compounds was 100 µg/mL; results were presented as the mean ± standard deviation for triplicate experiments. b Cycloheximide was used as the positive control. NI = not inhibited.