| Literature DB >> 29670903 |
Pinjie Chen1, Chunlei Wu1, Minghua Huang2, Guangjian Jin3, Qinglei Shi4, Zhihua Han5,6, Chun Chen3,7.
Abstract
AIMS: To investigate the correlation between the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and cervical intervertebral disc degeneration in adult symptomatic patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29670903 PMCID: PMC5835286 DOI: 10.1155/2018/6843053
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1T2-WI, DWI, and ADC-colored map images of the cervical spine. (a) T2-WI image of the cervical spine, showing the anatomical information of the cervical spine and discs. (b) The diffusion-weighted image (DWI) of the cervical spine (b value = 0 and 500 s/mm2). (c) ADC-colored map of the cervical spine.
Figure 2T2-WI and ADC-colored map of the cervical discs at each Pfirrmann grade and the ROI selection. According to the morphological shape of the disc on the T2-WI image, the ROI was manually delineated to cover the nucleus pulposus (NP) and then copied and pasted onto the ADC-colored map.
Numbers of the discs at each Pfirrmann grade classified by gender and anatomical level in symptomatic volunteers.
| Pfirrmann grade | Sex | Disc level | Total | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | C2-C3 | C3-C4 | C4-C5 | C5-C6 | C6-C7 | ||
| I | 15 | 14 | 10 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 29 |
| II | 35 | 20 | 17 | 11 | 10 | 6 | 11 | 55 |
| III | 57 | 31 | 15 | 20 | 22 | 19 | 12 | 88 |
| IV | 19 | 45 | 9 | 11 | 8 | 18 | 18 | 64 |
| V | 4 | 20 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 24 |
| Total | 130 | 130 | 52 | 52 | 52 | 52 | 52 | 260 |
Mean ADC values of cervical spine sorted by sex and anatomical level (×10−3 mm2/sec).
| Anatomical level | Sex |
| Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | |||
| C2-C3 | 2.10 ± 0.17 | 1.94 ± 0.22 | 0.008 | 2.02 ± 0.21 |
| C3-C4 | 2.05 ± 0.20 | 1.93 ± 0.25 | 0.034 | 1.99 ± 0.23 |
| C4-C5 | 2.02 ± 0.18 | 1.86 ± 0.20 | 0.006 | 1.94 ± 0.21 |
| C5-C6 | 2.01 ± 0.15 | 1.83 ± 0.26 | 0.003 | 1.92 ± 0.23 |
| C6-C7 | 2.03 ± 0.17 | 1.94 ± 0.30 | 0.196 | 1.98 ± 0.25 |
| Total | 2.04 ± 0.17 | 1.90 ± 0.25 | 1.97 ± 0.23 | |
P values were calculated by comparing ADC values of IVDs between male and female patients.
ADC values of asymptomatic and symptomatic volunteers according to Pfirrmann grade.
| Pfirrmann grade | Symptomatic patients | Asymptomatic volunteers | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | ADC mean value (×10−3 mm2/sec) | Number | ADC mean value (×10−3 mm2/sec) | |
| I | 29 | 2.19 ± 0.18 | 44 | 2.45 ± 0.11 |
| II | 55 | 2.05 ± 0.19@ | 52 | 2.32 ± 0.17$ |
| III | 88 | 1.98 ± 0.15@# | 63 | 2.16 ± 0.20$% |
| IV | 64 | 1.88 ± 0.19@#∧ | 36 | 1.94 ± 0.16$%~ |
| V | 24 | 1.72 ± 0.26@#∧& | 5 | 1.86 ± 0.24 |
| Total | 260 | 1.91 ± 0.23 | 200 | 2.18 ± 0.18 |
NP: nucleus pulposus, @compared with ADC values of grade I discs of symptomatic volunteers, P < 0.05; #compared with ADC values of grade II discs of symptomatic volunteers, P < 0.05; ∧compared with ADC values of grade III discs of symptomatic volunteers, P < 0.05; &compared with ADC values of grade V discs of symptomatic volunteers, P < 0.05; $compared with ADC values of grade I discs of asymptomatic volunteers, P < 0.05; %compared with ADC values of grade II discs of asymptomatic volunteers, P < 0.05; ~compared with ADC values of grade III discs of asymptomatic volunteers, P < 0.05.
Figure 3Negative correlation between the ADC value and the Pfirrmann grade. As shown in the graph, the ADC value decreased with higher Pfirrmann grade (r = −0.504, P < 0.001).
The results of ROC curve and cut-off values between adjacent Pfirrmann grades.
| Pfirrmann grade | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | AUC | Cut-off value (×10−3 mm2/sec) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I versus II | 51.70 | 83.60 | 0.693 | 2.22 |
| II versus III | 38.20 | 86.40 | 0.600 | 2.14 |
| III versus IV | 60.20 | 70.30 | 0.648 | 1.98 |
| IV versus V | 75.00 | 62.50 | 0.714 | 1.80 |
ADC cut-off value of each Pfirrmann grade.
| Pfirrmann grade | I | II | III | IV | V |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADC value (×10−3 mm2/sec) | >2.22 | 2.14–2.22 | 1.98–2.14 | 1.80–1.98 | <1.80 |