Literature DB >> 29667125

Parallel, exhaustive processing underlies logarithmic search functions: Visual search with cortical magnification.

Zhiyuan Wang1, Alejandro Lleras2, Simona Buetti2.   

Abstract

Our lab recently found evidence that efficient visual search (with a fixed target) is characterized by logarithmic Reaction Time (RT) × Set Size functions whose steepness is modulated by the similarity between target and distractors. To determine whether this pattern of results was based on low-level visual factors uncontrolled by previous experiments, we minimized the possibility of crowding effects in the display, compensated for the cortical magnification factor by magnifying search items based on their eccentricity, and compared search performance on such displays to performance on displays without magnification compensation. In both cases, the RT × Set Size functions were found to be logarithmic, and the modulation of the log slopes by target-distractor similarity was replicated. Consistent with previous results in the literature, cortical magnification compensation eliminated most target eccentricity effects. We conclude that the log functions and their modulation by target-distractor similarity relations reflect a parallel exhaustive processing architecture for early vision.

Keywords:  Cortical magnification; Eccentricity; Similarity; Visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29667125     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-018-1466-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  18 in total

Review 1.  Peripheral vision and pattern recognition: a review.

Authors:  Hans Strasburger; Ingo Rentschler; Martin Jüttner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 2.  Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2010-05-26

3.  Feature asymmetries in visual search: effects of display duration, target eccentricity, orientation and spatial frequency.

Authors:  M Carrasco; T L McLean; S M Katz; K S Frieder
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Cortical magnification neutralizes the eccentricity effect in visual search.

Authors:  M Carrasco; K S Frieder
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 5.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

6.  The eccentricity effect: target eccentricity affects performance on conjunction searches.

Authors:  M Carrasco; D L Evert; I Chang; S M Katz
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-11

7.  Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions.

Authors:  H J Müller; D Heller; J Ziegler
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-01

8.  Magnification factor and receptive field size in foveal striate cortex of the monkey.

Authors:  B M Dow; A Z Snyder; R G Vautin; R Bauer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Computational modelling of visual attention.

Authors:  L Itti; C Koch
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Is pop-out visual search attentive or preattentive? Yes!

Authors:  Hayley E P Lagroix; Vincent Di Lollo; Thomas M Spalek
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  2 in total

1.  Predicting how surface texture and shape combine in the human visual system to direct attention.

Authors:  Zoe Jing Xu; Alejandro Lleras; Simona Buetti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Predicting how color and shape combine in the human visual system to direct attention.

Authors:  Simona Buetti; Jing Xu; Alejandro Lleras
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.