Literature DB >> 29667078

Impact of different coarctation therapies on aortic stiffness: phase-contrast MRI study.

Michal Schäfer1, Gareth J Morgan2, Max B Mitchell3, Michael Ross3, Alex J Barker4, Kendall S Hunter5, Brian Fonseca2, Michael DiMaria2, Daniel Vargas6, D Dunbar Ivy2, Neil Wilson2, Lorna P Browne7.   

Abstract

Coarctation of the aorta has been associated with increased thoracic aortic stiffness in adolescents and young adults. However, the effects of different therapeutic strategies on aortic stiffness in a young population is unknown. This study aimed to non-invasively assess aortic stiffness between different repair or intervention strategies in patients with coarctation of the aorta. Forty-nine coarctation patients who underwent either surgery (n = 26), balloon angioplasty (n = 14), or stent implantation (n = 12), and 26 age- and size-matched normotensive healthy controls underwent evaluation of thoracic aortic stiffness and flow hemodynamics via phase-contrast cardiac magnetic resonance. In children who had undergone surgical repair or balloon angioplasty, ascending aortic stiffness was increased when measured via pulse wave velocity (PWV) when compared to normal controls (all P < 0.05). Furthermore, ascending aortic distensibility and relative area change (RAC) was significantly lower in surgically and balloon treated groups (both P < 0.01). Stiffness (PWV), distensibility, and RAC in the ascending aorta were not statistically different between stented patients and controls. The ascending aorta of children following surgical repair or balloon angioplasty demonstrated signs of elevated stiffness, whereas those treated by stent implantation showed no difference in stiffness markers when compared to normal controls.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic coarctation; CMR; Flow imaging; Stiffness

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29667078     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-018-1357-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  31 in total

1.  Thoracic aorta 3D hemodynamics in pediatric and young adult patients with bicuspid aortic valve.

Authors:  Bradley D Allen; Pim van Ooij; Alex J Barker; Maria Carr; Maya Gabbour; Susanne Schnell; Kelly B Jarvis; James C Carr; Michael Markl; Cynthia Rigsby; Joshua D Robinson
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Wall shear stress and flow patterns in the ascending aorta in patients with bicuspid aortic valves differ significantly from tricuspid aortic valves: a prospective study.

Authors:  Christian Meierhofer; Eike Philipp Schneider; Christine Lyko; Andrea Hutter; Stefan Martinoff; Michael Markl; Alfred Hager; John Hess; Heiko Stern; Sohrab Fratz
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-12-09       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Long-term, randomized comparison of balloon angioplasty and surgery for native coarctation of the aorta in childhood.

Authors:  Collin G Cowley; Garth S Orsmond; Peter Feola; Lon McQuillan; Robert E Shaddy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-06-13       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Vascular dysfunction after repair of coarctation of the aorta: impact of early surgery.

Authors:  M de Divitiis; C Pilla; M Kattenhorn; M Zadinello; A Donald; P Leeson; S Wallace; A Redington; J E Deanfield
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-09-18       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Comparison of surgical repair with balloon angioplasty for native coarctation in patients from 3 months to 16 years of age.

Authors:  Ronald J Walhout; Jaco C Lekkerkerker; Gordon H Oron; Ger B W E Bennink; Erik J Meijboom
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.191

6.  Arterial stiffness and cardiovascular events: the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Gary F Mitchell; Shih-Jen Hwang; Ramachandran S Vasan; Martin G Larson; Michael J Pencina; Naomi M Hamburg; Joseph A Vita; Daniel Levy; Emelia J Benjamin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Measuring aortic pulse wave velocity using high-field cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of techniques.

Authors:  El-Sayed H Ibrahim; Kevin R Johnson; Alan B Miller; Jean M Shaffer; Richard D White
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 5.364

8.  Increased central aortic stiffness and left ventricular mass in normotensive young subjects after successful coarctation repair.

Authors:  Phalla Ou; David S Celermajer; Odile Jolivet; Fanny Buyens; Alain Herment; Daniel Sidi; Damien Bonnet; Elie Mousseaux
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance measures of aortic stiffness in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes: association with glycaemic control and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Peter P Swoboda; Bara Erhayiem; Rachel Kan; Adam K McDiarmid; Pankaj Garg; Tarique A Musa; Laura E Dobson; Klaus K Witte; Mark T Kearney; Julian H Barth; Ramzi Ajjan; John P Greenwood; Sven Plein
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 9.951

10.  4D flow magnetic resonance imaging in bicuspid aortic valve disease demonstrates altered distribution of aortic blood flow helicity.

Authors:  R Lorenz; J Bock; A J Barker; F von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff; W Wallis; J G Korvink; M M Bissell; J Schulz-Menger; M Markl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  7 in total

1.  Serum uromodulin inversely associates with aortic stiffness in youth with type 1 diabetes: A brief report from EMERALD study.

Authors:  Pattara Wiromrat; Petter Bjornstad; Carlos Roncal; Melanie Cree-Green; Amy Baumgartner; Gregory Coe; Yesenia Garcia Reyes; Michal Schäfer; Uyen Truong; Laura Pyle; Richard J Johnson; Kristen J Nadeau
Journal:  J Diabetes Complications       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 2.852

Review 2.  Cardiovascular disease in young People with Type 1 Diabetes: Search for Cardiovascular Biomarkers.

Authors:  Michal Schäfer; Kristen J Nadeau; Jane E B Reusch
Journal:  J Diabetes Complications       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 2.852

3.  The effects of age at correction of aortic coarctation and recurrent obstruction on adolescent patients: MRI evaluation of wall shear stress and pulse wave velocity.

Authors:  Joe F Juffermans; Ineke Nederend; Pieter J van den Boogaard; Arend D J Ten Harkel; Mark G Hazekamp; Hildo J Lamb; Arno A W Roest; Jos J M Westenberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2019-06-20

Review 4.  Pros, cons and future perspectives - three questions on three dimensional guidance for cardiac catheterization in congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Sebastian Góreczny; Gregor Krings; Ziyad M Hijazi; Thomas Fagan; Darren Berman; Damien Kenny; Gareth J Morgan
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 1.426

5.  Wave Reflection and Ventriculo-Arterial Coupling in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Patients With Repaired Aortic Coarctation.

Authors:  Elena Giulia Milano; Sandra Neumann; Froso Sophocleous; Giulia Pontecorboli; Stephanie L Curtis; Radwa Bedair; Massimo Caputo; Giovanni Battista Luciani; Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci; Giovanni Biglino
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.418

Review 6.  Hypertension after coarctation repair-a systematic review.

Authors:  Joseph Panzer; Thierry Bové; Kristof Vandekerckhove; Daniël De Wolf
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2022-02

7.  Impact of valve morphology, hypertension and age on aortic wall properties in patients with coarctation: a two-centre cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Niky Ghorbani; Vivek Muthurangu; Abbas Khushnood; Leonid Goubergrits; Sarah Nordmeyer; Joao Filipe Fernandes; Chong-Bin Lee; Kilian Runte; Sophie Roth; Stephan Schubert; Sebastian Kelle; Felix Berger; Titus Kuehne; Marcus Kelm
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.