Literature DB >> 28820367

White-Nose Syndrome Fungus in a 1918 Bat Specimen from France.

Michael G Campana, Naoko P Kurata, Jeffrey T Foster, Lauren E Helgen, DeeAnn M Reeder, Robert C Fleischer, Kristofer M Helgen.   

Abstract

White-nose syndrome, first diagnosed in North America in 2006, causes mass deaths among bats in North America. We found the causative fungus, Pseudogymnoascus destructans, in a 1918 sample collected in Europe, where bats have now adapted to the fungus. These results are consistent with a Eurasian origin of the pathogen.

Entities:  

Keywords:  France; Myotis bechsteinii; Pseudogymnoascus destructans; White-nose syndrome; bats; fungi

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28820367      PMCID: PMC5572869          DOI: 10.3201/eid2309.170875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


We report the earliest known historical incidence of the fungus Pseudogymnoascus (formerly Geomyces) destructans, detected in a museum specimen of a bat (Myotis bechsteinii) collected in France in 1918. This fungal pathogen causes white-nose syndrome (WNS) in bats (). Since its introduction into eastern North America around 2006, WNS has devastated bat populations across the continent (). P. destructans has also been found across the Eurasian landmass (,) without documented mass bat deaths. Epidemiologic evidence among bats and fungal genetics indicate that the fungus has been recently introduced into North American bat populations (–). To clarify the epidemiologic history of WNS and to investigate physical evidence of its presence in specific locations in the past, we screened 138 19th- and 20th-century bat specimens (housed at the National Museum of Natural History [USNM], Washington, DC) from North America (n = 41), Europe (n = 83), and East Asia (n = 14) for P. destructans DNA (Technical Appendix). We sampled dry museum skins and intact bodies stored in 70% ethanol; some were originally fixed in formalin. We swabbed bat rostra and wings to collect potentially preserved P. destructans biomolecules and stored swabs in 100% ethanol until DNA extraction. We extracted DNA in a dedicated ancient DNA laboratory at the National Zoological Park (Washington, DC) by using stringent protocols to prevent false positive results from modern DNA contamination (). Before extraction, we removed swabs from the ethanol and let them air dry. We then let swabs digest overnight at 55°C in 600 μL extraction buffer (1× Tris-EDTA buffer, pH 8.0, 0.019 mmol/L EDTA, 0.01 mmol/L NaCl, 1% SDS, 10 mg/mL DTT, and 1 mg/mL proteinase K) (). Later extractions omitted DTT. We extracted digested samples twice in 600 μL phenol and once in 600 μL chloroform. We removed and concentrated the aqueous phase by using Amicon Ultra-4 30 kDA molecular weight cutoff columns (Millipore Sigma, Merck, Billerica, MA, USA) to a final volume of ≈250 μL. We included 1 extraction blank for every 10–11 historical samples. We screened extracts for P. destructans by using a previously described species-specific quantitative PCR targeting 103 bp (including primers) of the intergenic spacer region (). Each extract was amplified in 2–8 replicate PCRs. Multiple, no-template controls (,) were included in each PCR setup. Positive products from experiments in which quantifiable contamination (>0.1 genome equivalents/μL sample) was observed in >1 negative control were discarded; these experiments were repeated with fresh reagents. One sample (USNM 231170) tested positive in 2 of 3 PCRs. We performed a second independent extraction on this sample. The replicate extraction tested positive in 4 of 5 PCRs. Two of the USNM 231170–positive PCR products were confirmed by using Sanger sequencing and comparison to publicly available P. destructans sequences in GenBank. These sequences were 100% identical to P. destructans sequences from North America (GenBank accession nos. JX270192.1 and JX415267.1). In addition, 2 samples (USNM 15513 and 154222) yielded positive products in a single PCR each, but we were unable to replicate these results. No usable sequence was obtained from the USNM 15513 amplicon; the USNM 154222 sequence differed from the North American sequence by a single thymine deletion. DNA sequences were deposited in GenBank (accession nos. MF370925–6). The 1 confirmed case of P. destructans infection among the museum samples we studied (USNM 231170, male, skin and skull) was in a Bechstein’s bat (Myotis bechsteinii) collected on May 9, 1918, at Forêt de Russy, Centre-Val de Loire, France. This sequence is unlikely to represent P. destructans from a recently collected infected bat from North America because recently collected specimens have been purposefully stored with care in a separate room within the USNM mammal department, away from the historical bat collection. Furthermore, none of the historical samples of bats collected in North America, which are more likely to be cross-contaminated with potentially infected specimens compared with European specimens, tested positive for P. destructans. We provide evidence of the presence of P. destructans ≈100 years ago in Europe. In addition, we found no evidence of P. destructans in bats collected in eastern North America during 1861–1971. Although false negatives are highly likely because of the age, preparation, and storage of these specimens, these results are consistent with a Eurasian origin of the current WNS epidemic and strong association of the fungus with Eurasian bats of the genus Myotis (,,). Bats across Eurasia have adapted to P. destructans over more than a century, but the fungus was initially detected in North America during the early 21st century, and the bats on this continent have no immunity. This result extends the documented temporal occurrence of P. destructans as a bat-associated fungus to the early 20th century and highlights the value of archived museum specimens for epidemiologic study of emerging fungal diseases, including WNS.

Technical Appendix

Results of screening 138 historic bat specimens for Pseudogymnoascus destructans, the fungus associated with white-nose syndrome.
  8 in total

1.  White-Nose Syndrome fungus introduced from Europe to North America.

Authors:  Stefania Leopardi; Damer Blake; Sébastien J Puechmaille
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Experimental infection of bats with Geomyces destructans causes white-nose syndrome.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Lorch; Carol U Meteyer; Melissa J Behr; Justin G Boyles; Paul M Cryan; Alan C Hicks; Anne E Ballmann; Jeremy T H Coleman; David N Redell; DeeAnn M Reeder; David S Blehert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Inoculation of bats with European Geomyces destructans supports the novel pathogen hypothesis for the origin of white-nose syndrome.

Authors:  Lisa Warnecke; James M Turner; Trent K Bollinger; Jeffrey M Lorch; Vikram Misra; Paul M Cryan; Gudrun Wibbelt; David S Blehert; Craig K R Willis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Bat white-nose syndrome: a real-time TaqMan polymerase chain reaction test targeting the intergenic spacer region of Geomyces destructans.

Authors:  Laura K Muller; Jeffrey M Lorch; Daniel L Lindner; Michael O'Connor; Andrea Gargas; David S Blehert
Journal:  Mycologia       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 2.696

5.  Pan-European distribution of white-nose syndrome fungus (Geomyces destructans) not associated with mass mortality.

Authors:  Sébastien J Puechmaille; Gudrun Wibbelt; Vanessa Korn; Hubert Fuller; Frédéric Forget; Kristin Mühldorfer; Andreas Kurth; Wieslaw Bogdanowicz; Christophe Borel; Thijs Bosch; Thomas Cherezy; Mikhail Drebet; Tamás Görföl; Anne-Jifke Haarsma; Frank Herhaus; Guénael Hallart; Matthias Hammer; Christian Jungmann; Yann Le Bris; Lauri Lutsar; Matti Masing; Bart Mulkens; Karsten Passior; Martin Starrach; Andrzej Wojtaszewski; Ulrich Zöphel; Emma C Teeling
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  White-nose syndrome fungus (Geomyces destructans) in bats, Europe.

Authors:  Gudrun Wibbelt; Andreas Kurth; David Hellmann; Manfred Weishaar; Alex Barlow; Michael Veith; Julia Prüger; Tamás Görföl; Lena Grosche; Fabio Bontadina; Ulrich Zöphel; Hans Peter Seidl; Hans Peter Seidl; David S Blehert
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.883

7.  Widespread Bat White-Nose Syndrome Fungus, Northeastern China.

Authors:  Joseph R Hoyt; Keping Sun; Katy L Parise; Guanjun Lu; Kate E Langwig; Tinglei Jiang; Shubao Yang; Winifred F Frick; A Marm Kilpatrick; Jeffrey T Foster; Jiang Feng
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.883

8.  White-nose syndrome without borders: Pseudogymnoascus destructans infection tolerated in Europe and Palearctic Asia but not in North America.

Authors:  Jan Zukal; Hana Bandouchova; Jiri Brichta; Adela Cmokova; Kamil S Jaron; Miroslav Kolarik; Veronika Kovacova; Alena Kubátová; Alena Nováková; Oleg Orlov; Jiri Pikula; Primož Presetnik; Jurģis Šuba; Alexandra Zahradníková; Natália Martínková
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total
  11 in total

Review 1.  Museum specimens of terrestrial vertebrates are sensitive indicators of environmental change in the Anthropocene.

Authors:  C Jonathan Schmitt; Joseph A Cook; Kelly R Zamudio; Scott V Edwards
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Ecology and impacts of white-nose syndrome on bats.

Authors:  Joseph R Hoyt; A Marm Kilpatrick; Kate E Langwig
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 60.633

3.  Alterations in the health of hibernating bats under pathogen pressure.

Authors:  Hana Bandouchova; Tomáš Bartonička; Hana Berkova; Jiri Brichta; Tomasz Kokurewicz; Veronika Kovacova; Petr Linhart; Vladimir Piacek; Jiri Pikula; Alexandra Zahradníková; Jan Zukal
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  White-nose syndrome detected in bats over an extensive area of Russia.

Authors:  Veronika Kovacova; Jan Zukal; Hana Bandouchova; Alexander D Botvinkin; Markéta Harazim; Natália Martínková; Oleg L Orlov; Vladimir Piacek; Alexandra P Shumkina; Mikhail P Tiunov; Jiri Pikula
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Genome-Wide Changes in Genetic Diversity in a Population of Myotis lucifugus Affected by White-Nose Syndrome.

Authors:  Thomas M Lilley; Ian W Wilson; Kenneth A Field; DeeAnn M Reeder; Megan E Vodzak; Gregory G Turner; Allen Kurta; Anna S Blomberg; Samantha Hoff; Carl J Herzog; Brent J Sewall; Steve Paterson
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.154

6.  Atypical Dermatophytosis in 12 North American Porcupines (Erethizon dorsatum) from the Northeastern United States 2010-2017.

Authors:  David B Needle; Robert Gibson; Nicholas A Hollingshead; Inga F Sidor; Nicholas J Marra; Derek Rothenheber; Anil J Thachil; Bryce J Stanhope; Brian A Stevens; Julie C Ellis; Shelley Spanswick; Maureen Murray; Laura B Goodman
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2019-09-30

7.  Host conservation through their parasites: molecular surveillance of vector-borne microorganisms in bats using ectoparasitic bat flies.

Authors:  Tamara Szentiványi; Wanda Markotter; Muriel Dietrich; Laura Clément; Laurie Ançay; Loïc Brun; Eléonore Genzoni; Teresa Kearney; Ernest Seamark; Peter Estók; Philippe Christe; Olivier Glaizot
Journal:  Parasite       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 3.000

8.  Confirmed Cases of Ophidiomycosis in Museum Specimens from as Early as 1945, United States.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Lorch; Steven J Price; Julia S Lankton; Andrea N Drayer
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 6.883

Review 9.  Decades-old studies of fungi associated with mammalian lungs and modern DNA sequencing approaches help define the nature of the lung mycobiome.

Authors:  Paris S Hamm; John W Taylor; Joseph A Cook; Donald O Natvig
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 6.823

10.  Resistance is futile: RNA-sequencing reveals differing responses to bat fungal pathogen in Nearctic Myotis lucifugus and Palearctic Myotis myotis.

Authors:  Thomas M Lilley; Jenni M Prokkola; Anna S Blomberg; Steve Paterson; Joseph S Johnson; Gregory G Turner; Tomáš Bartonička; Erik Bachorec; DeeAnn M Reeder; Kenneth A Field
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.