| Literature DB >> 29665837 |
Wen-Ze Qiu1,2, Hai-Bo Zhang3, Wei-Xiong Xia1,2, Liang-Ru Ke1,2, Jing Yang4, Ya-Hui Yu1,2, Hu Liang1,2, Xin-Jun Huang1,2, Guo-Ying Liu1,2, Wang-Zhong Li1,2, Yan-Qun Xiang1,2, Tie-Bang Kang5, Xiang Guo6,7, Xing Lv8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Distant metastasis is the major cause of treatment failure in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Although several biomarkers correlate with metastasis and prognosis, the molecular mechanisms of NPC development and progression remain unclear.Entities:
Keywords: CXCL5; CXCR2; Distant metastasis; Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition; Nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29665837 PMCID: PMC5905166 DOI: 10.1186/s13046-018-0722-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Clin Cancer Res ISSN: 0392-9078
Clinicopathological correlation of CXCL5 expression and CXCR2 expression in NPC
| All patients | CXCL5 | CXCR2 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High ( | Low ( |
| High ( | Low ( |
| ||
| Age (year) | |||||||
| < 50 | 68(63.6) | 27 | 41 | 0.694 | 30 | 38 | 0.221 |
| ≥ 50 | 39(36.4) | 17 | 22 | 22 | 17 | ||
| Gender | |||||||
| Male | 84(78.5) | 35 | 49 | 0.827 | 37 | 47 | 0.072 |
| Female | 23(21.5) | 9 | 14 | 15 | 8 | ||
| Tumor classification | |||||||
| T1–2 | 59(55.1) | 22 | 37 | 0.372 | 27 | 32 | 0.515 |
| T3–4 | 48(44.9) | 22 | 26 | 25 | 23 | ||
| Nodal classification | |||||||
| N0–1 | 78(72.9) | 26 | 52 |
| 33 | 45 |
|
| N2–3 | 29(27.1) | 18 | 11 | 19 | 10 | ||
| Clinical classification | |||||||
| I-II | 44(41.1) | 14 | 30 | 0.102 | 20 | 24 | 0.587 |
| III-IVb | 63(58.9) | 30 | 33 | 32 | 31 | ||
| Local-regional recurrence | |||||||
| No | 90(84.1) | 35 | 55 | 0.280 | 46 | 44 | 0.231 |
| Yes | 17(15.9) | 9 | 8 | 6 | 11 | ||
| Distant metastasis | |||||||
| No | 85(79.4) | 32 | 53 | 0.055 | 37 | 48 |
|
| Yes | 22(20.6) | 12 | 10 | 15 | 7 | ||
| Progression | |||||||
| No | 70(65.4) | 24 | 46 |
| 32 | 38 | 0.412 |
| Yes | 37(34.6) | 20 | 17 | 20 | 17 | ||
Progression is defined as local-regional recurrence and/or distant metastasis after initial treatment. Statistical significance (P < 0.05) is shown in bold and italic
Fig. 1CXCL5 and CXCR2 are upregulated in NPC cell lines and tissue samples. a Representative images of CXCL5 expression and CXCR2 expression in non-tumour tissue and NPC tumour tissue detected by IHC. b The results of ELISAs of the human sera showed that the mean serum CXCL5 concentration of 50 NPC patients was significantly higher than that of 50 non-tumour patients. ***P < 0.001. c, d Upregulations of CXCL5 and CXCR2 were observed in different NPC cell lines compared with non-tumour control cells based on qRT-PCR and western blotting. NP69 cells were used as controls. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. e Higher levels of CXCL5 in the conditioned media (CM) were observed in the different NPC cell lines compared with the NP69 cells using ELISA. ****P < 0.0001. f Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that higher CXCL5 expression was significantly associated with poorer OS (P = 0.024) and lower DMFS (P = 0.018), and higher CXCR2 expression was significantly associated with lower DMFS (P = 0.042), but not with poorer OS (P = 0.812)
Cox proportional hazard regression analyses for 10-year OS and 10-year DMFS
| Prognosis | Wald |
| Exp(B) | 95% CI for Exp(B) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | ||||
| OS | |||||
| Age(year) ≥50 vs.<50 | 1.577 | 0.215 | 1.643 | 0.788 | 3.319 |
| Gender Female vs. Male | 3.298 | 0.081 | 2.506 | 0.907 | 6.387 |
| Histological type U vs. D | 0.441 | 0.526 | 0.745 | 0.253 | 2.479 |
| T classification T2–4 vs. T1 | 9.309 | 0.003a | 3.568 | 1.521 | 6.517 |
| N classification N1-3vs. N0 | 12.505 | 0.001a | 2.389 | 1.543 | 4.228 |
| Clinical classification II-IVb vs. I | 6.218 | 0.014a | 0.487 | 0.119 | 0.668 |
| CXCL5 expression High vs. Low | 4.885 | 0.027 | 1.960 | 1.079 | 3.560 |
| CXCR2 expression High vs. Low | 1.295 | 0.255 | 0.691 | 0.365 | 1.307 |
| DMFS | |||||
| Age(year) ≥50 vs.<50 | 1.267 | 0.234 | 2.137 | 0.802 | 4.304 |
| Gender Female vs. Male | 3.137 | 0.091 | 3.267 | 0.798 | 13.223 |
| Histological type U vs. D | 0.702 | 0.564 | 0.523 | 0.158 | 2.694 |
| T classification T2–4 vs. T1 | 3.236 | 0.079a | 2.413 | 0.903 | 6.446 |
| N classification N1-3vs. N0 | 6.533 | 0.004a | 2.578 | 1.131 | 6.327 |
| Clinical classification II-IVb vs. I | 2.786 | 0.095a | 0.413 | 0.251 | 1.099 |
| CXCL5 expression High vs. Low | 5.169 | 0.023 | 2.740 | 1.149 | 6.532 |
| CXCR2 expression High vs. Low | 1.700 | 0.192 | 1.879 | 0.728 | 4.849 |
a adjusted P-values < 0.017 were considered statistically significant
OS overall survival, DMFS distant metastasis-free survival, sCXCL5 serum CXCL5, D differentiated non-keratinized carcinoma, U undifferentiated non-keratinized carcinoma, CI confidence interval
Fig. 2Overexpression of CXCL5/CXCR2 axis promotes migration and invasion in vitro and lung metastasis in vivo. a The relative mRNA levels of CXCL5/CXCR2 in the indicated stable cell lines were determined by qRT-PCR. Mean ± SD of triplicate samples are shown; n = 3. b Relatively high expression of CXCL5 and CXCR2 were confirmed by western blotting in the CXCL5/CXCR2-overexpressing S26 and 6-10B cells compared with the vector control cells. c The cell growth rates were compared between the CXCR2-, CXCL5-, CXCR2 + CXCL5- and empty vector-transfected cells using cell growth assays. d Representative images and summaries of the foci formation induced by CXCR2- and CXCL5-transfected cells and vector control cells. e The cell migration and invasion of the indicated stable cell lines were determined as described in the Materials and Methods. Representative images of the migrated and invaded cells are shown. f, g The indicated stable transfected cells were injected into the lateral tail veins of nude mice. The superior and inferior panels present the macroscopic appearance of metastatic lung tumours and H & E staining, respectively. The arrows indicate the metastatic nodules. Original magnification: 20 × objective. h, i The tumour weights and numbers of metastases per lung in the mice that were injected with the indicated stable cells and the expression of human HPRT mRNA relative to mouse 18S rRNA in the lungs of the tumour-bearing nude mice are shown in H and I, respectively. There were 10 mice in each group. These experiments were repeated at least three times. Error bars, mean ± SD. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001
Fig. 3Silencing of CXCL5/CXCR2 axis inhibits migration and invasion in vitro and lung metastasis in vivo. a The relative mRNA levels of CXCL5/CXCR2 in the indicated stable cell lines were determined by qRT-PCR. The mean ± SD of triplicate samples are shown; n = 3. b The decreased expression of CXCL5 and CXCR2 in the CXCL5/CXCR2-silenced S18 and 5-8F cells compared with the scramble shRNA control cells were confirmed by western blotting. c The cell growth rates were compared between the CXCR2-, CXCL5-, CXCR2 + CXCL5- and scramble shRNA-transfected control cells using cell growth assays. d Representative images and summaries of the foci formation induced by cells transfected with CXCL5 and CXCR2 shRNA and scramble shRNA control cells. e The cell migration and invasion of the indicated stable cell lines were determined as described in the Materials and Methods. Representative images of the migrated and invaded cells are shown. f, g The indicated stable transfected cells were injected into the lateral tail veins of nude mice. The superior and inferior panels present the macroscopic appearance of metastatic lung tumours and H & E staining, respectively. The arrows indicate the metastatic nodules. Original magnification: 20 × objective. h, i The tumour weights and numbers of metastases per lung in the mice that were injected with the indicated stable cells, and the expression of human HPRT mRNA relative to mouse 18S rRNA in the lungs of the tumour-bearing nude mice are shown in H and I, respectively. There were 10 mice in each group. These experiments were repeated at least three times. Error bars, mean ± SD. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001
Fig. 4CXCL5/CXCR2 together induces EMT in NPC cells. a The cellular morphologies of the NPC cells with high or low CXCL5/CXCR2 expression. b The influence of the CXCL5/CXCR2 expression levels on cell morphology was confirmed by immunofluorescence assays using phalloidin (green) with DAPI counterstaining (blue). c The results of qRT-PCR and (d) western blot analyses revealed changes in the expression of EMT markers (E-cadherin and Vimentin) in the NPC cell lines. These experiments were repeated at least three times. Error bars, mean ± SD
Fig. 5Snail is required for CXCL5/CXCR2 axis-triggered EMT. a The expression profiles of ZEB1, Twist, Slug and Snail in the stable transfected cells based on western blot analysis. The knockdown of Snail with small interfering RNA reversed the CXCL5/CXCR2 axis-triggered EMT phenotype in the NPC cells as revealed by a western blot analysis and (b) cellular morphology. c The knockdown of Snail abolished the invasive ability of the NPC cells that was induced by the CXCL5/CXCR2 axis. These experiments were repeated at least three times. Error bars, mean ± SD. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001
Fig. 6The CXCL5/CXCR2 axis contributes to the EMT of NPC cells by activating ERK/GSK-3β/Snail signalling. a GSK-3β participated in the CXCL5/CXCR2 axis-induced EMT of NPC cells. b Luciferase reporter assays were performed with the indicated stable transfected cells. The transcriptional activity of the ERK1/2 pathway was enhanced predominantly when both proteins in the CXCL5/CXCR2 axis were overexpressed. c Western blot analysis showed that CXCL5/CXCR2 together induces hyperactivity of ERK1/2 signalling, which is necessary for the EMT. d ERK1/2 signalling is necessary for the invasiveness of NPC cells that is induced by the CXCL5/CXCR2 axis. e The CXCL5/CXCR2 axis contributes to the EMT of NPC cells by activating ERK/GSK-3β/Snail signalling. f Schematic representation of the major molecular mechanism of the induction of the EMT in NPC cells by the CXCL5/CXCR2 axis. These experiments were repeated at least three times. Error bars, mean ± SD. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001