Literature DB >> 29663709

Soft tissue nasal asymmetry as an indicator of orofacial cleft predisposition.

Charles Zhang1, Steven F Miller2, Jasmien Roosenboom3, George L Wehby4, Lina M Moreno Uribe5, Jacqueline T Hecht6, Frederic W B Deleyiannis7, Kaare Christensen8, Mary L Marazita3,9, Seth M Weinberg3,9.   

Abstract

The biological relatives of offspring with nonsyndromic orofacial clefts have been shown to exhibit distinctive facial features, including excess asymmetry, which are hypothesized to indicate the presence of genetic risk factors. The significance of excess soft tissue nasal asymmetry in at-risk relatives is unclear and was examined in the present study. Our sample included 164 unaffected parents from families with a history of orofacial clefting and 243 adult controls. Geometric morphometric methods were used to analyze the coordinates of 15 nasal landmarks collected from three-dimensional facial surface images. Following generalized Procrustes analysis, Procrustes ANOVA and MANOVA tests were applied to determine the type and magnitude of nasal asymmetry present in each group. Group differences in mean nasal asymmetry were also assessed via permutation testing. We found that nasal asymmetry in both parents and controls was directional in nature, although the magnitude of the asymmetry was greater in parents. This was confirmed with permutation testing, where the mean nasal asymmetry was significantly different (p < .0001) between parents and controls. The asymmetry was greatest for midline structures and the nostrils. When subsets of parents were subsequently analyzed and compared (parents with bilateral vs. unilateral offspring; parents with left vs. right unilateral offspring), each group showed a similar pattern of asymmetry and could not be distinguished statistically. Thus, the side of the unilateral cleft (right vs. left) in offspring was not associated with the direction of the nasal asymmetry in parents.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cleft lip and palate; geometric morphometrics; shape variation; stereophotogrammetry

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29663709      PMCID: PMC5992056          DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.38688

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  36 in total

1.  Cranial airways and the integration between the inner and outer facial skeleton in humans.

Authors:  Markus Bastir; Antonio Rosas
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 2.868

2.  Facial asymmetry in young healthy subjects evaluated by statistical shape analysis.

Authors:  Ilker Ercan; Senem Turan Ozdemir; Abdullah Etoz; Deniz Sigirli; R Shane Tubbs; Marios Loukas; Ibrahim Guney
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Bilateral cleft lip and palate: A morphometric analysis of facial skeletal form using cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  John M Starbuck; Ahmed Ghoneima; Katherine Kula
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 2.414

Review 4.  Correction of the cleft nasal deformity: from infancy to maturity.

Authors:  Mark D Fisher; David M Fisher; Jeffrey R Marcus
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 2.017

5.  Human tooth-size asymmetry in cleft lip with or without cleft palate.

Authors:  J A Sofaer
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 2.633

6.  Nostril asymmetry not a microform of cleft lip.

Authors:  H Pashayan; F C Fraser
Journal:  Cleft Palate J       Date:  1971-04

7.  Nasal deformity and microform cleft lip in parents of patients with cleft lip.

Authors:  A Sigler; D S Ontiveros
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  1999-03

8.  Laterality patterns in infants with external birth defects.

Authors:  L J Paulozzi; J M Lary
Journal:  Teratology       Date:  1999-11

9.  Asymmetry of the craniofacial skeleton in the parents of children with a cleft lip, with or without a cleft palate, or an isolated cleft palate.

Authors:  G T McIntyre; P A Mossey
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  The 3D Facial Norms Database: Part 1. A Web-Based Craniofacial Anthropometric and Image Repository for the Clinical and Research Community.

Authors:  Seth M Weinberg; Zachary D Raffensperger; Matthew J Kesterke; Carrie L Heike; Michael L Cunningham; Jacqueline T Hecht; Chung How Kau; Jeffrey C Murray; George L Wehby; Lina M Moreno; Mary L Marazita
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2015-10-22
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  What's Shape Got to Do With It? Examining the Relationship Between Facial Shape and Orofacial Clefting.

Authors:  Seth M Weinberg
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Symmetry and fluctuation of cell movements in neural crest-derived facial mesenchyme.

Authors:  Adrian Danescu; Elisabeth G Rens; Jaspreet Rehki; Johnathan Woo; Takashi Akazawa; Katherine Fu; Leah Edelstein-Keshet; Joy M Richman
Journal:  Development       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 6.868

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.