Literature DB >> 23999909

Cranial airways and the integration between the inner and outer facial skeleton in humans.

Markus Bastir1, Antonio Rosas.   

Abstract

The cranial airways are in the center of the human face. Therefore variation in the size and shape of these central craniofacial structures could have important consequences for the surrounding midfacial morphology during development and evolution. Yet such interactions are unclear because one school of thought, based on experimental and developmental evidence, suggests a relative independence (modularity) of these two facial compartments, whereas another one assumes tight morphological integration. This study uses geometric morphometrics of modern humans (N = 263) and 40 three-dimensional-landmarks of the skeletal nasopharynx and nasal cavity and outer midfacial skeleton to analyze these questions in terms of modularity. The sizes of all facial compartments were all strongly correlated. Shape integration was high between the cranial airways and the outer midfacial skeleton and between the latter and the anterior airway openings (skeletal regions close to and including piriform aperture). However, no shape integration was detected between outer midface and posterior airway openings (nasopharynx and choanae). Similarly, no integration was detected between posterior and anterior airway openings. This may reflect functional modularization of nasal cavity compartments related to respiratory physiology and differential developmental interactions with the face. Airway size likely relates to the energetics of the organism, whereas airways shape might be more indicative of respiratory physiology and climate. Although this hypothesis should be addressed in future steps, here we suggest that selection on morphofunctional characteristics of the cranial airways could have cascading effects for the variation, development, and evolution of the human face.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ecomorphological patterns; geometric morphometrics; midface; modularity; nasal cavity

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23999909     DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.22359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  11 in total

1.  Impact of sampling strategies and reconstruction protocols in nasal airflow simulations in fossil hominins.

Authors:  Andrej A Evteev; Yann Heuzé
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Reply to Evteev and Heuzé: How to overcome the problem of modeling respiration departing from bony structures.

Authors:  S de Azevedo; M F González; C Cintas; V Ramallo; M Quinto-Sánchez; F Márquez; T Hünemeier; C Paschetta; A Ruderman; P Navarro; B A Pazos; C C Silva de Cerqueira; O Velan; F Ramírez-Rozzi; N Calvo; H G Castro; R R Paz; R González-José
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Soft tissue nasal asymmetry as an indicator of orofacial cleft predisposition.

Authors:  Charles Zhang; Steven F Miller; Jasmien Roosenboom; George L Wehby; Lina M Moreno Uribe; Jacqueline T Hecht; Frederic W B Deleyiannis; Kaare Christensen; Mary L Marazita; Seth M Weinberg
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 2.802

4.  Contribution of the maxillary sinus to the modularity and variability of nasal cavity shape in Japanese macaques.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Ito; Takeshi D Nishimura; Yuzuru Hamada; Masanaru Takai
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 2.163

5.  Craniofacial skeletal response to encephalization: How do we know what we think we know?

Authors:  Kate M Lesciotto; Joan T Richtsmeier
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.868

6.  Computer simulations show that Neanderthal facial morphology represents adaptation to cold and high energy demands, but not heavy biting.

Authors:  Stephen Wroe; William C H Parr; Justin A Ledogar; Jason Bourke; Samuel P Evans; Luca Fiorenza; Stefano Benazzi; Jean-Jacques Hublin; Chris Stringer; Ottmar Kullmer; Michael Curry; Todd C Rae; Todd R Yokley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Late subadult ontogeny and adult aging of the human thorax reveals divergent growth trajectories between sexes.

Authors:  Daniel García-Martínez; Markus Bastir; Chiara Villa; Francisco García-Río; Isabel Torres-Sánchez; Wolfgang Recheis; Alon Barash; Roman Hossein Khonsari; Paul O'Higgins; Marc R Meyer; Yann Heuzé
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The vocal tract as a time machine: inferences about past speech and language from the anatomy of the speech organs.

Authors:  Dan Dediu; Scott R Moisik; W A Baetsen; Abel Marinus Bosman; Andrea L Waters-Rist
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Relationships between the hard and soft dimensions of the nose in Pan troglodytes and Homo sapiens reveal the positions of the nasal tips of Plio-Pleistocene hominids.

Authors:  Ryan M Campbell; Gabriel Vinas; Maciej Henneberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Anatomical Network Comparison of Human Upper and Lower, Newborn and Adult, and Normal and Abnormal Limbs, with Notes on Development, Pathology and Limb Serial Homology vs. Homoplasy.

Authors:  Rui Diogo; Borja Esteve-Altava; Christopher Smith; Julia C Boughner; Diego Rasskin-Gutman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.