Literature DB >> 20083809

Asymmetry of the craniofacial skeleton in the parents of children with a cleft lip, with or without a cleft palate, or an isolated cleft palate.

G T McIntyre1, P A Mossey.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate asymmetry of the parental craniofacial skeleton of subjects with a cleft lip, with or without cleft palate [CL(P)], and isolated cleft palate (CP). The postero-anterior (PA) cephalograms of 52 parents of children with CL(P) and 40 parents of children with CP from a sample of 196 children with non-syndromic clefts in the west of Scotland were analysed. A conventional cephalometric asymmetry analysis was used to evaluate size-related right:left asymmetry comprising eight linear distances, nine angular, and three facial area measurements. Right:left ratios of the mean values identified the direction of the asymmetry and two-sample t-tests determined statistical significance. A shape-related asymmetry analysis was also undertaken. The configurations of landmarks were optimally superimposed and scaled using Procrustes algorithms. Euclidean distance matrix analysis (EDMA) was then compared and the shape of the left and the right landmark configurations were statistically tested using a non-parametric bootstrap technique. For the parents of CL(P) children, size-related asymmetry was identified and the area of the craniofacial polygon was statistically significantly larger on the right than on the left side. EDMA detected the presence of shape-related asymmetry (T statistic = 1.304; P = 0.003). For the parents of CP children, although size-related asymmetry was identified, EDMA did not identify shape-related asymmetry (T statistic = 1.281; P = 0.065). Size and shape directional asymmetries are characteristic features of the parental craniofacial skeleton in CL(P). Although directional size asymmetry is present in the parental craniofacial skeleton in CP, shape asymmetry is not a characteristic feature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20083809     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjp067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  6 in total

1.  Soft tissue nasal asymmetry as an indicator of orofacial cleft predisposition.

Authors:  Charles Zhang; Steven F Miller; Jasmien Roosenboom; George L Wehby; Lina M Moreno Uribe; Jacqueline T Hecht; Frederic W B Deleyiannis; Kaare Christensen; Mary L Marazita; Seth M Weinberg
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 2.  What's Shape Got to Do With It? Examining the Relationship Between Facial Shape and Orofacial Clefting.

Authors:  Seth M Weinberg
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Exploratory genotype-phenotype correlations of facial form and asymmetry in unaffected relatives of children with non-syndromic cleft lip and/or palate.

Authors:  Steven F Miller; Seth M Weinberg; Nichole L Nidey; David K Defay; Mary L Marazita; George L Wehby; Lina M Moreno Uribe
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Facial phenotypes in subgroups of prepubertal boys with autism spectrum disorders are correlated with clinical phenotypes.

Authors:  Kristina Aldridge; Ian D George; Kimberly K Cole; Jordan R Austin; T Nicole Takahashi; Ye Duan; Judith H Miles
Journal:  Mol Autism       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 7.509

5.  Preoperative analysis of upper lip in patients with upper cleft lip/palate before lip repair.

Authors:  Junyan Jing; Xiaoxuan Chen; Bing Shi; Yufeng Wang; Yongbin Mou; Yong Lu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

6.  A comparative study of facial asymmetry in philippine, colombian, and ethiopian families with nonsyndromic cleft lip palate.

Authors:  Liliana Otero; Luis Bermudez; Karina Lizarraga; Irene Tangco; Rocelyn Gannaban; Daniel Meles
Journal:  Plast Surg Int       Date:  2012-10-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.