Literature DB >> 29663038

[Relevance of spinal navigation in reconstructive surgery of the cervical spine].

R Kothe1, M Richter2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spinal navigation has made significant advances in the last two decades. After initial experiences with pedicle screws in the thoracic and lumbar spine, technological improvements have resulted in their increased application in the cervical spine. Instrumentation techniques like cervical pedicle screws, lateral mass screws in C1 and transarticular screws C1/C2 have become standard due to the application of image guidance. TECHNIQUE: Different navigation techniques can be distinguished based on the type of imaging. In the cervical spine, the preoperative computer tomography (CT) scan that requires intraoperative matching is still the standard of care due to the high image quality. 3D fluoroscopy navigation techniques are currently widely used in the lumbar spine, but the reduced image quality obviates the application in the more sophisticated cervical anatomy or the cervicothoracic region. The future availability of intraoperative CT scans (iCT) combines the advantages of high image quality with those of intraoperative image acquisition. This will lead to a wider use of image guidance in the cervical spine and will enable the surgeon to apply minimally invasive techniques with higher accuracy. APPLICATION: The successful application of spinal navigation is based on the technical knowledge of navigation systems and its exercise in daily routine. Only the sufficient experience of the clinical staff makes it possible to standardize operational procedures to increase patient safety, reduce radiation dose and shorten operation time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3-D imaging; Cervical vertebrae; Image-guided surgery; Peroperative complications; Screw misplacement

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29663038     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-018-3568-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  42 in total

1.  Computer-assisted posterior instrumentation of the cervical and cervico-thoracic spine.

Authors:  Marcus Richter; Thomas Mattes; Balkan Cakir
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-11-22       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Pedicle screw navigation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perforation risk for computer-navigated versus freehand insertion.

Authors:  Benjamin J Shin; Andrew R James; Innocent U Njoku; Roger Härtl
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2012-06-22

Review 3.  The accuracy of pedicle screw placement using intraoperative image guidance systems.

Authors:  Alexander Mason; Renee Paulsen; Jason M Babuska; Sharad Rajpal; Sigita Burneikiene; E Lee Nelson; Alan T Villavicencio
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2013-12-20

Review 4.  Guided pedicle screw insertion: techniques and training.

Authors:  Amir Manbachi; Richard S C Cobbold; Howard J Ginsberg
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  Screw perforation features in 129 consecutive patients performed computer-guided cervical pedicle screw insertion.

Authors:  Masashi Uehara; Jun Takahashi; Shota Ikegami; Keijiro Mukaiyama; Shugo Kuraishi; Masayuki Shimizu; Toshimasa Futatsugi; Nobuhide Ogihara; Hiroyuki Hashidate; Hiroki Hirabayashi; Hiroyuki Kato
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Increased cancer risk among surgeons in an orthopaedic hospital.

Authors:  Giuseppe Mastrangelo; Ugo Fedeli; Emanuela Fadda; Angelo Giovanazzi; Luca Scoizzato; Bruno Saia
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.611

7.  Computer-assisted pedicle screw fixation. A feasibility study.

Authors:  L P Amiot; H Labelle; J A DeGuise; M Sati; P Brodeur; C H Rivard
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Biomechanical analysis of transpedicular screw fixation in the subaxial cervical spine.

Authors:  Ralph Kothe; Wolfgang Rüther; Erich Schneider; Berend Linke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Radiation exposure to the surgeon and the patient during posterior lumbar spinal instrumentation: a prospective randomized comparison of navigated versus non-navigated freehand techniques.

Authors:  Jimmy Villard; Yu-Mi Ryang; Andreas K Demetriades; Andreas Reinke; Michael Behr; Alexander Preuss; Bernhard Meyer; Florian Ringel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Navigated odontoid screw placement using the O-arm: technical note and case series.

Authors:  Jared M Pisapia; Nikhil R Nayak; Ryan D Salinas; Luke Macyszyn; John Y K Lee; Timothy H Lucas; Neil R Malhotra; H Isaac Chen; James M Schuster
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2016-08-12
View more
  3 in total

1.  Accuracy of pedicle screw placement using neuronavigation based on intraoperative 3D rotational fluoroscopy in the thoracic and lumbar spine.

Authors:  Nora Conrads; Jan-Peter Grunz; Henner Huflage; Karsten Sebastian Luetkens; Philipp Feldle; Katharina Grunz; Stefan Köhler; Thomas Westermaier
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 2.  [Does navigation still have a value in trauma surgery?]

Authors:  Swantje Oberthür; Stephan Sehmisch; Lukas Weiser; Lennart Viezens; Timo Stübig
Journal:  Orthopadie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-08-12

3.  Application of Enhanced Recovery after Surgical Treatment of the Occipitocervical Region.

Authors:  Peng Liu; Hai Nie; Zhuan Wang; Bao Yao; Jia-Hong Li; Ji Zhou
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.071

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.