Literature DB >> 25095759

Screw perforation features in 129 consecutive patients performed computer-guided cervical pedicle screw insertion.

Masashi Uehara1, Jun Takahashi, Shota Ikegami, Keijiro Mukaiyama, Shugo Kuraishi, Masayuki Shimizu, Toshimasa Futatsugi, Nobuhide Ogihara, Hiroyuki Hashidate, Hiroki Hirabayashi, Hiroyuki Kato.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A cross-sectional study of the data retrospectively collected by chart review.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to clarify screw perforation features in 129 consecutive patients treated with computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw (CPS) insertion and to determine important considerations for computer-assisted CPS insertion. CPS fixation has been criticized for the potential risk of serious injury to neurovascular structures. To avoid such serious risks, computed tomography (CT)-based navigation has been used during CPS insertion, but screw perforation can occur even with the use of a navigation system.
METHODS: The records of 129 consecutive patients who underwent cervical (C2-C7) pedicle screw insertion using a CT-based navigation system from September 1997 to August 2013 were reviewed. Postoperative CT images were used to evaluate the accuracy of screw placement. The screw insertion status was classified as grade 1 (no perforation), indicating that the screw was accurately inserted in pedicle; grade 2 (minor perforation), indicating perforation of less than 50 % of the screw diameter; and grade 3 (major perforation), indicating perforation of 50 % or more of the screw diameter. We analyzed the direction and rate of screw perforation according to the vertebral level.
RESULTS: The rate of grade 3 pedicle screw perforations was 6.7 % (39/579), whereas the combined rate of grades 2 and 3 perforations was 20.0 % (116/579). No clinically significant complications, such as vertebral artery injury, spinal cord injury, or nerve root injury, were caused by the screw perforations. Of the screws showing grade 3 perforation, 30.8 % screws were medially perforated and 69.2 % screws were laterally perforated. Of the screws showing grades 2 and 3 perforation, 21.6 % screws were medially perforated and 78.4 % screws were laterally perforated. Furthermore, we evaluated screw perforation rates according to the vertebral level. Grade 3 pedicle screw perforation occurred in 6.1 % of C2 screws; 7.5 % of C3 screws; 13.0 % of C4 screws; 6.5 % of C5 screws; 3.2 % of C6 screws; and 4.0 % of C7 screws. Grades 2 and 3 pedicle screw perforations occurred in 12.1 % of C2 screws, 22.6 % of C3 screws, 31.5 % of C4 screws, 22.2 % of C5 screws, 14.4 % of C6 screws, and 12.1 % of C7 screws. C3-5 screw perforation rate was significantly higher than C6-7 (p = 0.0024).
CONCLUSIONS: Careful insertion of pedicle screws is necessary, especially at C3 to C5, even when using a CT-based navigation system. Pedicle screws tend to be laterally perforated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25095759     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3502-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  20 in total

1.  One-stage posterior decompression and reconstruction of the cervical spine by using pedicle screw fixation systems.

Authors:  K Abumi; K Kaneda; Y Shono; M Fujiya
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Improved accuracy of computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw insertion.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Kotani; Kuniyoshi Abumi; Manabu Ito; Akio Minami
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  Surgical anatomy of the cervical pedicles: landmarks for posterior cervical pedicle entrance localization.

Authors:  E E Karaikovic; S Kunakornsawat; M D Daubs; T W Madsen; R W Gaines
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  2000-02

4.  Clinical accuracy of three-dimensional fluoroscopy-based computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw placement: a retrospective comparative study of conventional versus computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw placement.

Authors:  Yoshimoto Ishikawa; Tokumi Kanemura; Go Yoshida; Zenya Ito; Akio Muramoto; Shuichiro Ohno
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2010-11

5.  Cervical pedicle screws vs. lateral mass screws: uniplanar fatigue analysis and residual pullout strengths.

Authors:  Todd L Johnston; Eldin E Karaikovic; Eugene P Lautenschlager; David Marcu
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  Image-guided pedicle screw insertion accuracy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nai-Feng Tian; Hua-Zi Xu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Accuracy of multilevel registration in image-guided pedicle screw insertion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Jun Takahashi; Hiroki Hirabayashi; Hiroyuki Hashidate; Nobuhide Ogihara; Hiroyuki Kato
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Computed tomography assessment of lateral pedicle wall perforation by free-hand subaxial cervical pedicle screw placement.

Authors:  Yingsong Wang; Jingming Xie; Zhendong Yang; Zhi Zhao; Ying Zhang; Tao Li; Luping Liu
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  A comparison of pedicle and lateral mass screw construct stiffnesses at the cervicothoracic junction: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  John M Rhee; Chaiwat Kraiwattanapong; William C Hutton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Cervical pedicle screw insertion using the technique with direct exposure of the pedicle by laminoforaminotomy.

Authors:  Dae-Jean Jo; Eun-Min Seo; Ki-Tack Kim; Sung-Min Kim; Sang-Hun Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2012-11-30
View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  [Spinal navigation for posterior cervical and cervicothoracic instrumentation].

Authors:  M Richter; D Ploux
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 1.154

2.  Screw perforation rates in 359 consecutive patients receiving computer-guided pedicle screw insertion along the cervical to lumbar spine.

Authors:  Masashi Uehara; Jun Takahashi; Shota Ikegami; Shugo Kuraishi; Toshimasa Futatsugi; Hiroyuki Kato
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  A novel posterior approach preserving three muscles inserted at C2 in multilevel cervical posterior decompression and fusion using C2 pedicle screws.

Authors:  Kazunari Takeuchi; Toru Yokoyama; Takuya Numasawa; Taito Itabashi; Yoshihito Yamasaki; Hitoshi Kudo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Cervical pedicle screw placement using intraoperative computed tomography imaging with a mobile scanner gantry.

Authors:  Toshitaka Yoshii; Takashi Hirai; Kenichiro Sakai; Hiroyuki Inose; Tsuyoshi Kato; Atsushi Okawa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  [Relevance of spinal navigation in reconstructive surgery of the cervical spine].

Authors:  R Kothe; M Richter
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  The feasibility of transpedicular screw fixation of the subaxial cervical spine in the Arab population: a computed tomography-based morphometric study.

Authors:  Osama Al-Saeed; Yousef Marwan; Osama Rabie Kombar; Ahmed Samir; Mehraj Sheikh
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2016-02-11

Review 7.  Differences between Manufacturers of Computed Tomography-Based Computer-Assisted Surgery Systems Do Exist: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Anas Nooh; Joushua Lubov; Ahmed Aoude; Sultan Aldebeyan; Peter Jarzem; Jean Ouellet; Michael H Weber
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-02-01

8.  A Modified Personalized Image-Based Drill Guide Template for Atlantoaxial Pedicle Screw Placement: A Clinical Study.

Authors:  Lianghai Jiang; Liang Dong; Mingsheng Tan; Yingna Qi; Feng Yang; Ping Yi; Xiangsheng Tang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-03-16

9.  Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement Using Medial Funnel Technique.

Authors:  Jung Hwan Lee; Byung Kwan Choi; In Ho Han; Won Gyu Choi; Kyoung Hyup Nam; Hwan Soo Kim
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2017-09-30

10.  Safety and efficacy of lateral mass screws at C7 in the treatment of cervical degenerative disease.

Authors:  Chengmin Zhang; Qiang Zhou; Paul M Arnold
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2017-09-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.