Billy A Caceres1, Abraham A Brody2, Perry N Halkitis3, Caroline Dorsen4, Gary Yu4, Deborah A Chyun4. 1. Columbia School of Nursing, New York, New York; NYU Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York, New York. Electronic address: bac2134@cumc.columbia.edu. 2. Hartford Institute for Geriatric Nursing, New York, New York. 3. Department of Biostatistics, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, New Jersey; Departments of Health Education and Behavioral Science, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey; Center for Health, Identity, Behavior & Prevention Studies, College of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, New York; Graduate School of Applied & Professional Psychology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey. 4. NYU Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York, New York.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Sexual minority women (lesbian and bisexual) experience significant stigma, which may increase their cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of modifiable risk factors for CVD (including mental distress, health behaviors, blood pressure, glycosylated hemoglobin, and total cholesterol) and CVD in sexual minority women compared with their heterosexual peers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A secondary analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2001-2012) was conducted. Multiple imputation with chained equations was performed. Logistic regression models adjusted for relevant covariates were run. Self-report (medical history and medication use) and biomarkers for hypertension, diabetes, and high total cholesterol were examined. RESULTS: The final analytic sample consisted of 7,503 that included 346 sexual minority women (4.6%). Sexual minority women were more likely to be younger, single, have a lower income, and lack health insurance. After covariate adjustment, sexual minority women exhibited excess CVD risk related to higher rates of frequent mental distress (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45-2.88), current tobacco use (AOR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.53-2.91), and binge drinking (AOR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.17-2.34). Sexual minority women were more likely to be obese (AOR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.23-2.33) and have glycosylated hemoglobin consistent with prediabetes (AOR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.04-2.34). No differences were observed for other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Sexual minority women demonstrated increased modifiable risk factors for CVD, but no difference in CVD diagnoses. Several emerging areas of research are highlighted, in particular, the need for CVD prevention efforts that target modifiable CVD risk in sexual minority women.
OBJECTIVE: Sexual minority women (lesbian and bisexual) experience significant stigma, which may increase their cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of modifiable risk factors for CVD (including mental distress, health behaviors, blood pressure, glycosylated hemoglobin, and total cholesterol) and CVD in sexual minority women compared with their heterosexual peers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A secondary analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2001-2012) was conducted. Multiple imputation with chained equations was performed. Logistic regression models adjusted for relevant covariates were run. Self-report (medical history and medication use) and biomarkers for hypertension, diabetes, and high total cholesterol were examined. RESULTS: The final analytic sample consisted of 7,503 that included 346 sexual minority women (4.6%). Sexual minority women were more likely to be younger, single, have a lower income, and lack health insurance. After covariate adjustment, sexual minority women exhibited excess CVD risk related to higher rates of frequent mental distress (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45-2.88), current tobacco use (AOR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.53-2.91), and binge drinking (AOR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.17-2.34). Sexual minority women were more likely to be obese (AOR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.23-2.33) and have glycosylated hemoglobin consistent with prediabetes (AOR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.04-2.34). No differences were observed for other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Sexual minority women demonstrated increased modifiable risk factors for CVD, but no difference in CVD diagnoses. Several emerging areas of research are highlighted, in particular, the need for CVD prevention efforts that target modifiable CVD risk in sexual minority women.
Authors: Mark L Hatzenbuehler; Anna Bellatorre; Yeonjin Lee; Brian K Finch; Peter Muennig; Kevin Fiscella Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2013-06-18 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Kristen Emory; Yoonsang Kim; Francisco Buchting; Lisa Vera; Jidong Huang; Sherry L Emery Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-09-16 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Patricia M Guenther; Kellie O Casavale; Jill Reedy; Sharon I Kirkpatrick; Hazel A B Hiza; Kevin J Kuczynski; Lisa L Kahle; Susan M Krebs-Smith Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet Date: 2013-02-13 Impact factor: 4.910
Authors: Karen I Fredriksen-Goldsen; Jane M Simoni; Hyun-Jun Kim; Keren Lehavot; Karina L Walters; Joyce Yang; Charles P Hoy-Ellis; Anna Muraco Journal: Am J Orthopsychiatry Date: 2014-11
Authors: Billy A Caceres; Abraham Brody; Rachel E Luscombe; Jillian E Primiano; Peter Marusca; Edward M Sitts; Deborah Chyun Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2017-02-16 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Billy A Caceres; Kasey B Jackman; Lilian Ferrer; Kenrick D Cato; Tonda L Hughes Journal: Int J Nurs Stud Date: 2019-02-08 Impact factor: 5.837