Billy A Caceres1, Nina Markovic, Donald Edmondson, Tonda L Hughes. 1. Billy A. Caceres, PhD, RN, AGPCNP-BC Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York. Nina Markovic, PhD Associate Professor, University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine. Donald Edmondson, PhD Associate Professor of Behavioral Medicine (in Medicine and Psychiatry), Columbia University Irving Medical Center. Tonda L. Hughes, PhD, RN, FAAN Henrik H. Bendixen Professor of International Nursing (in Psychiatry), Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adverse life experiences (ALE; eg, discrimination and sexual abuse) may contribute to cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in sexual minority women (SMW), but few studies have tested whether ALE explain the association of sexual identity with cardiovascular health (CVH) markers in women. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine sexual identity differences in CVH among women and the role of ALE. METHODS: In the Epidemiologic Study of Risk in Women, we used multinomial logistic regression to assess sexual identity differences (SMW vs heterosexual women [reference group]) in CVH markers (ideal vs poor, intermediate vs poor) using the American Heart Association's Life's Simple 7 metric and the total score. Next, we tested whether the association of sexual identity with the total CVH score was attenuated by traditional CVD risk factors or ALE. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 867 women (395 heterosexual, 472 SMW). Sexual minority women were more likely to have experienced discrimination (P < .001) and lifetime sexual abuse (P < .001) than heterosexual women. Sexual minority women were also less likely to meet ideal CVH criteria for current tobacco use (adjusted odds ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.73) or intermediate CVH criteria for body mass index (adjusted odds ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.92). Sexual minority women had a lower cumulative CVH score (B [SE] = -0.35 [0.14], P < .01) than heterosexual women. This difference was not explained by traditional CVD risk factors or ALE. CONCLUSIONS: Smoking, body mass index, and fasting glucose accounted for much of the CVH disparity due to sexual identity, but those differences were not explained by ALE. Health behavior interventions tailored to SMW should be considered.
BACKGROUND: Adverse life experiences (ALE; eg, discrimination and sexual abuse) may contribute to cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in sexual minority women (SMW), but few studies have tested whether ALE explain the association of sexual identity with cardiovascular health (CVH) markers in women. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine sexual identity differences in CVH among women and the role of ALE. METHODS: In the Epidemiologic Study of Risk in Women, we used multinomial logistic regression to assess sexual identity differences (SMW vs heterosexual women [reference group]) in CVH markers (ideal vs poor, intermediate vs poor) using the American Heart Association's Life's Simple 7 metric and the total score. Next, we tested whether the association of sexual identity with the total CVH score was attenuated by traditional CVD risk factors or ALE. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 867 women (395 heterosexual, 472 SMW). Sexual minority women were more likely to have experienced discrimination (P < .001) and lifetime sexual abuse (P < .001) than heterosexual women. Sexual minority women were also less likely to meet ideal CVH criteria for current tobacco use (adjusted odds ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.73) or intermediate CVH criteria for body mass index (adjusted odds ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.92). Sexual minority women had a lower cumulative CVH score (B [SE] = -0.35 [0.14], P < .01) than heterosexual women. This difference was not explained by traditional CVD risk factors or ALE. CONCLUSIONS: Smoking, body mass index, and fasting glucose accounted for much of the CVH disparity due to sexual identity, but those differences were not explained by ALE. Health behavior interventions tailored to SMW should be considered.
Authors: Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Yuling Hong; Darwin Labarthe; Dariush Mozaffarian; Lawrence J Appel; Linda Van Horn; Kurt Greenlund; Stephen Daniels; Graham Nichol; Gordon F Tomaselli; Donna K Arnett; Gregg C Fonarow; P Michael Ho; Michael S Lauer; Frederick A Masoudi; Rose Marie Robertson; Véronique Roger; Lee H Schwamm; Paul Sorlie; Clyde W Yancy; Wayne D Rosamond Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-01-20 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Andrea L Roberts; S Bryn Austin; Heather L Corliss; Ashley K Vandermorris; Karestan C Koenen Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2010-04-15 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Sean Esteban McCabe; Wendy B Bostwick; Tonda L Hughes; Brady T West; Carol J Boyd Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2010-01-14 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Salim Yusuf; Steven Hawken; Stephanie Ounpuu; Tony Dans; Alvaro Avezum; Fernando Lanas; Matthew McQueen; Andrzej Budaj; Prem Pais; John Varigos; Liu Lisheng Journal: Lancet Date: 2004 Sep 11-17 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: April J Ancheta; Billy A Caceres; Sarah S Zollweg; Kristin E Heron; Cindy B Veldhuis; Nicole A VanKim; Tonda L Hughes Journal: Eat Behav Date: 2021-08-16
Authors: Billy A Caceres; Meghan Reading Turchioe; Anthony Pho; Theresa A Koleck; Ruth Masterson Creber; Suzanne B Bakken Journal: Am J Health Promot Date: 2020-06-19
Authors: Allison R Webel; Julie Schexnayder; Patricia A Cioe; Julie A Zuñiga Journal: J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care Date: 2021 May-Jun 01 Impact factor: 1.809
Authors: Billy A Caceres; April J Ancheta; Caroline Dorsen; Kelley Newlin-Lew; Donald Edmondson; Tonda L Hughes Journal: Ethn Health Date: 2020-03-11 Impact factor: 2.772
Authors: Billy A Caceres; Carl G Streed; Heather L Corliss; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Phoenix A Matthews; Monica Mukherjee; Tonia Poteat; Nicole Rosendale; Leanna M Ross Journal: Circulation Date: 2020-10-08 Impact factor: 29.690