Literature DB >> 29660752

Optimal Timing of Delivery in Women with Higher Order Cesareans: A Cohort Study.

Emily S Miller1,2, Chloe Nielsen1, Kelly B Zafman3, Nathan S Fox3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether a planned early term delivery or a planned 39-week delivery is associated with differences in perinatal outcomes in women undergoing a higher order cesarean (HOC). STUDY
DESIGN: This cohort study included women with singleton gestations with a history of three or more prior cesareans who delivered at one of two urban tertiary care hospitals. One center routinely delivered HOC at 39 weeks' gestation and the other at 37 weeks. Maternal and neonatal morbidities were compared using bivariable and multivariable analyses.
RESULTS: The policy of 37-week delivery was associated with a decrease in unscheduled deliveries (15.3 vs. 41.1%; p < 0.001). Planned delivery at 37 weeks was associated with a decreased incidence of composite maternal morbidity (1.6 vs. 7.9%; p = 0.002) and 5-minute Apgar score less than 7 (0.4 vs. 6.4%; p < 0.001), but these differences were not significant after controlling for potential confounders (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.08-1.17; aOR: 0.13, 95% CI: 0.01-1.30, respectively). There were no other differences in perinatal outcomes.
CONCLUSION: Compared with planned delivery at 39 weeks, a policy of planned delivery at 37 weeks was associated with a reduction in unscheduled deliveries, but there were no measured differences in perinatal outcomes. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29660752      PMCID: PMC6156940          DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1641587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Perinatol        ISSN: 0735-1631            Impact factor:   1.862


  22 in total

1.  Higher order repeat caesarean sections: how safe are five or more?

Authors:  Mumtaz Rashid; Rabia S Rashid
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.531

2.  Long-term maternal morbidity associated with repeat cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Erin A S Clark; Robert M Silver
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Predicting uterine rupture in women undergoing trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Mark B Landon
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.300

Review 4.  Delivery after previous cesarean: long-term maternal outcomes.

Authors:  Robert M Silver
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.300

5.  Adhesion development and morbidity after repeat cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Togas Tulandi; Mohammed Agdi; Afsoon Zarei; Louise Miner; Vanja Sikirica
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 6.  Cesarean birth in the United States: epidemiology, trends, and outcomes.

Authors:  Marian F MacDorman; Fay Menacker; Eugene Declercq
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.430

7.  Time between skin incision and delivery during cesarean.

Authors:  Jana N Rossouw; David Hall; Justin Harvey
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 3.561

8.  Effect of Resident Participation on Outcomes in High-Order Cesarean Deliveries.

Authors:  Mirella Mourad; Simi Gupta; Andrei Rebarber; Daniel H Saltzman; Nathan S Fox
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Risk of perinatal death associated with labor after previous cesarean delivery in uncomplicated term pregnancies.

Authors:  Gordon C S Smith; Jill P Pell; Alan D Cameron; Richard Dobbie
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002 May 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Timing of indicated late-preterm and early-term birth.

Authors:  Catherine Y Spong; Brian M Mercer; Mary D'Alton; Sarah Kilpatrick; Sean Blackwell; George Saade
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 7.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.