Literature DB >> 15383111

Higher order repeat caesarean sections: how safe are five or more?

Mumtaz Rashid1, Rabia S Rashid.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the maternal morbidity and mortality associated with multiple repeat caesarean sections.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Security Forces Hospital serving Ministry of Interior and Security Forces personnel in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. POPULATION: Three hundred and eight case records undergoing between fifth and ninth caesarean section (mean 7) were studied and compared with a control group of 306 patients undergoing third or fourth caesarean section during the period January 1994-December 2002. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Operative and post-operative complications and difficulties.
RESULTS: Five or more caesarean sections were associated with a longer operating time as well as an increased rate of severe adhesions. Blood transfusion rate was similar in the two groups but a drop of pre-operative to post-operative haemoglobin was significantly higher in the study group compared with the controls. There was no significant difference in the Apgar score of the baby, neonatal admission rate, incidence of caesarean hysterectomy, uterine scar rupture, placenta praevia, placenta accreta, bladder injury, incidence of postpartum pyrexia, wound infection and urinary tract infection between the two groups. There was no maternal death in the study group but one mother died in the control group.
CONCLUSION: The higher order (5-9) repeat caesarean sections carry no specific additional risk for the mother or the baby when compared with the lower order (3 or 4) repeat caesarean sections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15383111     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00244.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  6 in total

Review 1.  Postoperative adhesion development following cesarean and open intra-abdominal gynecological operations: a review.

Authors:  Awoniyi O Awonuga; Nicole M Fletcher; Ghassan M Saed; Michael P Diamond
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 3.060

2.  Optimal Timing of Delivery in Women with Higher Order Cesareans: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Emily S Miller; Chloe Nielsen; Kelly B Zafman; Nathan S Fox
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Systematic review of urological injury during caesarean section and hysterectomy.

Authors:  Gavin Wei; Frances Harley; Michael O'Callaghan; James Adshead; Derek Hennessey; Ned Kinnear
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 1.932

4.  Is it safe to have multiple repeat cesarean sections? A high volume tertiary care center experience.

Authors:  Alper Biler; Atalay Ekin; Aykut Ozcan; Abdurrahman Hamdi Inan; Tayfun Vural; Emrah Toz
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.088

5.  Outcomes and Complications After Repeat Cesarean Sections Among King Abdulaziz University Hospital Patients.

Authors:  Khalid A Alshehri; Ahmed A Ammar; Meshal A Aldhubabian; Mohammed S Al-Zanbaqi; Ahyad A Felimban; Motaz K Alshuaibi; Ayman Oraif
Journal:  Mater Sociomed       Date:  2019-06

6.  Intra-operative complications increase with successive number of cesarean sections: Myth or fact?

Authors:  Shumaila Zia; Muhammad Rafique
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2014-05-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.