Literature DB >> 20654777

Predicting uterine rupture in women undergoing trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery.

Mark B Landon1.   

Abstract

Uterine rupture is the most serious complication for women undergoing trial of labor (TOL) after prior cesarean delivery. While rates of uterine rupture vary significantly according to a variety of clinically associated risk factors, the absolute risk for this complication ranges between 0.5 and 4 percent. Previous vaginal delivery and prior successful vaginal birth after cesarean delivery confer the lowest risk of rupture on women attempting TOL. In contrast, multiple prior cesareans, short interpregnancy interval, single layer uterine closure, prior preterm cesarean, labor induction and augmentation have all been suggested in some studies as factors which may increase the rate of uterine rupture. While considering these risk factors is important in counseling women regarding childbirth following cesarean delivery, the infrequency of uterine rupture coupled with relatively weak associations for most risk factors has prevented the development of an accurate prediction tool for uterine rupture. Preliminary studies suggest that sonographic evaluation of the uterine scar may hold some promise for identifying women at risk. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20654777     DOI: 10.1053/j.semperi.2010.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Perinatol        ISSN: 0146-0005            Impact factor:   3.300


  12 in total

Review 1.  Comparison between modified Misgav-Ladach and Pfannenstiel-Kerr techniques for Cesarean section: review of literature.

Authors:  Salvatore Giovanni Vitale; Ilaria Marilli; Pietro Cignini; Francesco Padula; Laura D'Emidio; Lucia Mangiafico; Agnese Maria Chiara Rapisarda; Ferdinando Antonio Gulino; Stefano Cianci; Antonio Biondi; Claudio Giorlandino
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2014 Apr-Jun

2.  Induction of labor by Foley catheter compared with spontaneous onset of labor after previous cesarean section: a cohort study.

Authors:  H Kruit; H Wilkman; A Tekay; L Rahkonen
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 2.521

3.  Reproductive outcomes in women with prior cesarean section undergoing in vitro fertilization: A retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Ya-Qin Wang; Tai-Lang Yin; Wang-Min Xu; Qian-Rong Qi; Xiao-Chen Wang; Jing Yang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2017-12-21

4.  Optimal Timing of Delivery in Women with Higher Order Cesareans: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Emily S Miller; Chloe Nielsen; Kelly B Zafman; Nathan S Fox
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Outcome of Induction of Labor with Foley's Catheter in Women with Previous One Cesarean Section with Unfavorable Cervix: An Experience From a Tertiary Care Institute in South India.

Authors:  Venkata A RamyaMohana; Gowri Dorairajan
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2021-03-24

6.  Silent Spontaneous Uterine Rupture at 36 Weeks of Gestation.

Authors:  J Y Woo; L Tate; S Roth; A C Eke
Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-08-19

7.  Prediction of uterine dehiscence using ultrasonographic parameters of cesarean section scar in the nonpregnant uterus: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Michal Pomorski; Tomasz Fuchs; Mariusz Zimmer
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Spontaneous Posterior Uterine Rupture in Twin-Twin Transfusion Syndrome.

Authors:  Marcela C Smid; Rebecca Waltner-Toews; William Goodnight
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2015-11-16

9.  Uterine Rupture at 21 Weeks in Twin Pregnancy with TTTS and Previous C-Section.

Authors:  Gieta Bhikha-Kori; Marieke Sueters; Johanna M Middeldorp
Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-08-03

10.  Uterine closure with unlocked suture in cesarean section: Safety and Quality.

Authors:  Guluzar Arzu Turan; Esra Bahar Gur; Sumeyra Tatar; Ayse Gokduman; Serkan Guclu
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.088

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.