Literature DB >> 29659132

Three dimensional extrusion printing induces polymer molecule alignment and cell organization within engineered cartilage.

Ting Guo1,2, Julia P Ringel1,2, Casey G Lim1,2, Laura G Bracaglia1,2, Maeesha Noshin1,2, Hannah B Baker1,2, Douglas A Powell3, John P Fisher1,2.   

Abstract

Proper cell-material interactions are critical to remain cell function and thus successful tissue regeneration. Many fabrication processes have been developed to create microenvironments to control cell attachment and organization on a three-dimensional (3D) scaffold. However, these approaches often involve heavy engineering and only the surface layer can be patterned. We found that 3D extrusion based printing at high temperature and pressure will result an aligned effect on the polymer molecules, and this molecular arrangement will further induce the cell alignment and different differentiation capacities. In particular, articular cartilage tissue is known to have zonal collagen fiber and cell orientation to support different functions, where collagen fibers and chondrocytes align parallel, randomly, and perpendicular, respectively, to the surface of the joint. Therefore, cell alignment was evaluated in a cartilage model in this study. We used small angle X-ray scattering analysis to substantiate the polymer molecule alignment phenomenon. The cellular response was evaluated both in vitro and in vivo. Seeded mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) showed different morphology and orientation on scaffolds, as a combined result of polymer molecule alignment and printed scaffold patterns. Gene expression results showed improved superficial zonal chondrogenic marker expression in parallel-aligned group. The cell alignment was successfully maintained in the animal model after 7 days with distinct MSC morphology between the casted and parallel printed scaffolds. This 3D printing induced polymer and cell alignment will have a significant impact on developing scaffold with controlled cell-material interactions for complex tissue engineering while avoiding complicated surface treatment, and therefore provides new concept for effective tissue repairing in future clinical applications.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 106A: 2190-2199, 2018. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; cell alignment; cell-material interaction; poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid); polymer alignment; scaffold

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29659132      PMCID: PMC6030456          DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.36426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A        ISSN: 1549-3296            Impact factor:   4.396


  32 in total

1.  Nantotechniques and approaches in biotechnology.

Authors:  A Curtis; C Wilkinson
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 19.536

2.  Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment.

Authors:  Rowena McBeath; Dana M Pirone; Celeste M Nelson; Kiran Bhadriraju; Christopher S Chen
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 12.270

3.  The promotion of chondrogenesis, osteogenesis, and adipogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells by multiple growth factors incorporated into nanosphere-coated microspheres.

Authors:  Ji S Park; Han N Yang; Dae G Woo; Su Y Jeon; Keun-H Park
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 4.  Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate.

Authors:  Dennis E Discher; Paul Janmey; Yu-Li Wang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Exploring and engineering the cell surface interface.

Authors:  Molly M Stevens; Julian H George
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder.

Authors:  Matthew J Dalby; Nikolaj Gadegaard; Rahul Tare; Abhay Andar; Mathis O Riehle; Pawel Herzyk; Chris D W Wilkinson; Richard O C Oreffo
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2007-09-23       Impact factor: 43.841

7.  Cell distribution of stress fibres in response to the geometry of the adhesive environment.

Authors:  Manuel Théry; Anne Pépin; Emilie Dressaire; Yong Chen; Michel Bornens
Journal:  Cell Motil Cytoskeleton       Date:  2006-06

Review 8.  Intrinsic extracellular matrix properties regulate stem cell differentiation.

Authors:  Gwendolen C Reilly; Adam J Engler
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 9.  Trends in the surgical treatment of articular cartilage lesions in the United States: an analysis of a large private-payer database over a period of 8 years.

Authors:  Frank McCormick; Joshua D Harris; Geoffrey D Abrams; Rachel Frank; Anil Gupta; Kristen Hussey; Hillary Wilson; Bernard Bach; Brian Cole
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  A cartilage ECM-derived 3-D porous acellular matrix scaffold for in vivo cartilage tissue engineering with PKH26-labeled chondrogenic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Qiang Yang; Jiang Peng; Quanyi Guo; Jingxiang Huang; Li Zhang; Jun Yao; Fei Yang; Shenguo Wang; Wenjing Xu; Aiyuan Wang; Shibi Lu
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 12.479

View more
  9 in total

1.  Toward guiding principles for the design of biologically-integrated electrodes for the central nervous system.

Authors:  Cort H Thompson; Ti'Air E Riggins; Paras R Patel; Cynthia A Chestek; Wen Li; Erin Purcell
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Achieving molecular orientation in thermally extruded 3D printed objects.

Authors:  Salim A Ghodbane; N Sanjeeva Murthy; Michael G Dunn; J Kohn
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 9.954

Review 3.  3D printing in cell culture systems and medical applications.

Authors:  Max J Lerman; Josephine Lembong; Greg Gillen; John P Fisher
Journal:  Appl Phys Rev       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 19.162

4.  Computational investigation of interface printing patterns within 3D printed multilayered scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering.

Authors:  Robert Choe; Eoin Devoy; Blake Kuzemchak; Mary Sherry; Erfan Jabari; Jonathan D Packer; John P Fisher
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 9.954

5.  A biofabrication method to align cells within bioprinted photocrosslinkable and cell-degradable hydrogel constructs via embedded fibers.

Authors:  Margaret E Prendergast; Matthew D Davidson; Jason A Burdick
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 11.061

Review 6.  Biomechanical Aspects of Osteochondral Regeneration: Implications and Strategies for Three-Dimensional Bioprinting.

Authors:  Robert Choe; Eoin Devoy; Erfan Jabari; Jonathan D Packer; John P Fisher
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 7.376

7.  Gravity-based patterning of osteogenic factors to preserve bone structure after osteochondral injury in a large animal model.

Authors:  Hannah M Zlotnick; Ryan C Locke; Sanjana Hemdev; Brendan D Stoeckl; Sachin Gupta; Ana P Peredo; David R Steinberg; James L Carey; Daeyeon Lee; George R Dodge; Robert L Mauck
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 11.061

8.  3D printed biofunctionalized scaffolds for microfracture repair of cartilage defects.

Authors:  Ting Guo; Maeesha Noshin; Hannah B Baker; Evin Taskoy; Sean J Meredith; Qinggong Tang; Julia P Ringel; Max J Lerman; Yu Chen; Jonathan D Packer; John P Fisher
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 9.  On the Interaction between 1D Materials and Living Cells.

Authors:  Giuseppe Arrabito; Yana Aleeva; Vittorio Ferrara; Giuseppe Prestopino; Clara Chiappara; Bruno Pignataro
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2020-06-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.