Literature DB >> 35120345

Computational investigation of interface printing patterns within 3D printed multilayered scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering.

Robert Choe1,2, Eoin Devoy1,2, Blake Kuzemchak1,2, Mary Sherry1,2, Erfan Jabari1,2, Jonathan D Packer3, John P Fisher1,2.   

Abstract

Osteoarthritis is a highly prevalent rheumatic musculoskeletal disorder that commonly affects many joints. Repetitive joint overloading perpetuates the damage to the affected cartilage, which undermines the structural integrity of the osteochondral unit. Various tissue engineering strategies have been employed to design multiphasic osteochondral scaffolds that recapitulate layer-specific biomechanical properties, but the inability to fully satisfy mechanical demands within the joint has limited their success. Through computational modeling and extrusion-based bioprinting, we attempted to fabricate a biphasic osteochondral scaffold with improved shear properties and a mechanically strong interface. A 3D stationary solid mechanics model was developed to simulate the effect of lateral shear force on various thermoplastic polymer/hydrogel scaffolds with a patterned interface. Additionally, interfacial shear tests were performed on bioprinted polycaprolactone (PCL)/hydrogel interface scaffolds. The first simulation showed that the PCL/gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) and PCL/polyethylene glycol diacrylate (PEGDA) scaffolds interlocking hydrogel and PCL at interface in a 1:1 ratio possessed the largest average tensile (PCL/GelMA: 80.52 kPa; PCL/PEGDA: 79.75 kPa) and compressive stress (PCL/GelMA: 74.71 kPa; PCL/PEGDA: 73.83 kPa). Although there were significant differences in shear strength between PCL/GelMA and PCL/PEGDA scaffolds, no significant difference was observed among the treatment groups within both scaffold types. Lastly, the hypothetical simulations of potential biphasic 3D printed scaffolds showed that for every order of magnitude decrease in Young's modulus (E) of the soft bioink, all the scaffolds underwent an exponential increase in average displacement at the cartilage and interface layers. The following work provides valuable insights into the biomechanics of 3D printed osteochondral scaffolds, which will help inform future scaffold designs for enhanced regenerative outcomes.
© 2022 IOP Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D bioprinting; computational modeling; osteochondral interface

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35120345      PMCID: PMC8918066          DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/ac5220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofabrication        ISSN: 1758-5082            Impact factor:   9.954


  69 in total

Review 1.  Regular review: medical management of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  K Walker-Bone; K Javaid; N Arden; C Cooper
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-10-14

2.  Structural and rheological properties of methacrylamide modified gelatin hydrogels.

Authors:  A I Van Den Bulcke; B Bogdanov; N De Rooze; E H Schacht; M Cornelissen; H Berghmans
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 6.988

3.  3D printing of novel osteochondral scaffolds with graded microstructure.

Authors:  Margaret A Nowicki; Nathan J Castro; Michael W Plesniak; Lijie Grace Zhang
Journal:  Nanotechnology       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 3.874

4.  The apparent elastic modulus of the juxtarticular subchondral bone of the femoral head.

Authors:  T D Brown; M S Vrahas
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 5.  Cartilage in normal and osteoarthritis conditions.

Authors:  Johanne Martel-Pelletier; Christelle Boileau; Jean-Pierre Pelletier; Peter J Roughley
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.098

6.  StarPEG/heparin-hydrogel based in vivo engineering of stable bizonal cartilage with a calcified bottom layer.

Authors:  Elke Kunisch; Anne-Kathrin Knauf; Eliane Hesse; Uwe Freudenberg; Carsten Werner; Friederike Bothe; Solvig Diederichs; Wiltrud Richter
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 9.954

Review 7.  Osteoarthritis year in review 2019: epidemiology and therapy.

Authors:  M Kloppenburg; F Berenbaum
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 6.576

8.  The basic science of articular cartilage: structure, composition, and function.

Authors:  Alice J Sophia Fox; Asheesh Bedi; Scott A Rodeo
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.843

9.  Precise control of synthetic hydrogel network structure via linear, independent synthesis-swelling relationships.

Authors:  N R Richbourg; M Wancura; A E Gilchrist; S Toubbeh; B A C Harley; E Cosgriff-Hernandez; N A Peppas
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 14.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.