Literature DB >> 16550544

Cell distribution of stress fibres in response to the geometry of the adhesive environment.

Manuel Théry1, Anne Pépin, Emilie Dressaire, Yong Chen, Michel Bornens.   

Abstract

Cells display a large variety of shapes when plated in classical culture conditions despite their belonging to a common cell type. These shapes are transitory, since cells permanently disassemble and reassemble their cytoskeleton while moving. Adhesive micropatterns are commonly used to confine cell shape within a given geometry. In addition the micropattern can be designed so as to impose cells to spread upon adhesive and nonadhesive areas. Modulation of the pattern geometry allows the analysis of the mechanisms governing the determination of cell shape in response to external adhesive conditions. In this study, we show that the acquisition of cell shape follows two stages where initially the cell forms contact with the micropattern. Here, the most distal contacts made by the cell with the micropattern define the apices of the cell shape. Then secondly, the cell borders that link two apices move so as to minimise the distance between the two apices. In these cell borders, the absence of an underlying adhesive substrate is overcome by stress fibres forming between the apices, which in turn are marked by an accumulation of focal adhesions. By inhibiting myosin function, cell borders on nonadhesive zones become more concave, suggesting that the stress fibres work against the membrane tension in the cell border. Moreover, this suggested that traction forces are unevenly distributed in stationary, nonmigrating, cells. By comparing the stress fibres in cells with one, two, or three nonadherent cell borders it was reasoned that stress fibre strength is inversely proportional to number. We conclude that cells of a given area can generate the same total sum of tractional forces but that these tractional forces are differently spaced depending on the spatial distribution of its adherence contacts. Copyright 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16550544     DOI: 10.1002/cm.20126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Motil Cytoskeleton        ISSN: 0886-1544


  138 in total

1.  Cell shape, spreading symmetry and the polarization of stress-fibers in cells.

Authors:  A Zemel; F Rehfeldt; A E X Brown; D E Discher; S A Safran
Journal:  J Phys Condens Matter       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 2.333

2.  Spatial organization of the extracellular matrix regulates cell-cell junction positioning.

Authors:  Qingzong Tseng; Eve Duchemin-Pelletier; Alexandre Deshiere; Martial Balland; Hervé Guillou; Odile Filhol; Manuel Théry
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Nucleation geometry governs ordered actin networks structures.

Authors:  Anne-Cécile Reymann; Jean-Louis Martiel; Théo Cambier; Laurent Blanchoin; Rajaa Boujemaa-Paterski; Manuel Théry
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 43.841

Review 4.  Microfabricated substrates as a tool to study cell mechanotransduction.

Authors:  Jimmy le Digabel; Marion Ghibaudo; Léa Trichet; Alain Richert; Benoit Ladoux
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Mapping the cytoskeletal prestress.

Authors:  Chan Young Park; Dhananjay Tambe; Adriano M Alencar; Xavier Trepat; En Hua Zhou; Emil Millet; James P Butler; Jeffrey J Fredberg
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 4.249

6.  Probabilistic density maps to study global endomembrane organization.

Authors:  Kristine Schauer; Tarn Duong; Kevin Bleakley; Sabine Bardin; Michel Bornens; Bruno Goud
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-05-30       Impact factor: 28.547

7.  Improved visualization and quantitative analysis of drug effects using micropatterned cells.

Authors:  Sébastien Degot; Muriel Auzan; Violaine Chapuis; Anne Béghin; Amélie Chadeyras; Constantin Nelep; Maria Luisa Calvo-Muñoz; Joanne Young; François Chatelain; Alexandra Fuchs
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 1.355

8.  Single cells spreading on a protein lattice adopt an energy minimizing shape.

Authors:  Benoit Vianay; Jos Käfer; Emmanuelle Planus; Marc Block; François Graner; Hervé Guillou
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 9.161

9.  Substrates with patterned extracellular matrix and subcellular stiffness gradients reveal local biomechanical responses.

Authors:  Peter Tseng; Dino Di Carlo
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 30.849

10.  Role of catch bonds in actomyosin mechanics and cell mechanosensitivity.

Authors:  Franck J Vernerey; Umut Akalp
Journal:  Phys Rev E       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 2.529

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.