Literature DB >> 29658816

A mixed treatment comparison of toxicity of gemcitabine combined with different targeted drugs in the treatment of advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Penpa Dorjee1,2,3, Zi-Wen Long1,2,3.   

Abstract

The mixed treatment comparison study was performed in order to compare the toxicities of Gemcitabine and different targeted drug combinations in the treatment of advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC). Searches were performed from the inception of PubMed and Cochrane Library databases to February 2017. This study included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of Gemcitabine and different targeted drug combinations in the treatment of advanced/metastatic PC. Odds ratio (OR) values were calculated by direct and indirect comparisons, and the surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) were drawn. A total of six RCTs were finally incorporated into the study. These studies included six therapy regimens: Gemcitabine + Axitinib, Gemcitabine + Trametinib, Gemcitabine + Sorafenib, Gemcitabine + Bevacizumab, Gemcitabine + Erlotinib and Gemcitabine + Tipifarnib. The results showed that Gemcitabine + Axitinib combinations showed lower incidence rates of rashes (all grades) in comparison to Gemcitabine + Trametinib and Gemcitabine + Erlotinib combinations. Compared with Gemcitabine+ Trametinib combinations, Gemcitabine + Axitinib combinations showed lower incidence rates of diarrhea (grade ≥ 3). Moreover, the cluster analyses results revealed that Gemcitabine + Axitinib combinations and Gemcitabine + Sorafenib combinations showed lower incidence rates of hematotoxicity, while Gemcitabine + Axitinib combinations showed lower incidence rates of non-hematotoxicity. Collectively, the data provided strong evidence of Gemcitabine + Axitinib combinations showing lower incidence rates of non-hematotoxicity, and Gemcitabine + Axitinib and Gemcitabine + Sorafenib combinations may have lower incidence rates of hematotoxicity in the treatment of advanced/metastatic PC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian network meta-analysis; Hematotoxicity; Non-hematotoxicity; Pancreatic cancer; Randomized controlled trials; Targeted drugs

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29658816      PMCID: PMC5927709          DOI: 10.1080/15384047.2018.1433503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther        ISSN: 1538-4047            Impact factor:   4.742


  28 in total

1.  Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial.

Authors:  Georgia Salanti; A E Ades; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Should combination chemotherapy serve as the backbone in clinical trials of advanced pancreatic cancer? A pooled analysis of phase II trials of gemcitabine-containing doublets plus bevacizumab.

Authors:  Katherine Van Loon; Anne M Espinoza; David R Fogelman; Robert A Wolff; Milind M Javle; Renuka V Iyer; Vincent J Picozzi; Ludmila Katherine Martin; Tanios Bekaii-Saab; Margaret A Tempero; Nathan R Foster; George P Kim; Andrew H Ko
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.327

3.  Gemcitabine plus sorafenib in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase II trial of the University of Chicago Phase II Consortium.

Authors:  Hedy Lee Kindler; Kristen Wroblewski; James A Wallace; Michael J Hall; Gershon Locker; Sreenivasa Nattam; Edem Agamah; Walter M Stadler; Everett E Vokes
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2010-08-28       Impact factor: 3.850

4.  Phase III trial of gemcitabine plus tipifarnib compared with gemcitabine plus placebo in advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  E Van Cutsem; H van de Velde; P Karasek; H Oettle; W L Vervenne; A Szawlowski; P Schoffski; S Post; C Verslype; H Neumann; H Safran; Y Humblet; J Perez Ruixo; Y Ma; D Von Hoff
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in determining treatment efficacy and outcome after pancreatic cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  Atsushi Sofuni; Takao Itoi; Fumihide Itokawa; Takayoshi Tsuchiya; Toshio Kurihara; Kentaro Ishii; Syujiro Tsuji; Nobuhito Ikeuchi; Fuminori Moriyasu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Retarded low-dose doxycycline for EGFR or MEK inhibitor-induced papulopustular rash.

Authors:  J Vaubel; E Livingstone; D Schadendorf; L Zimmer
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 7.  Comparative efficacy and tolerability of three treatments in old people with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a network meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Ling-Xiao Chen; Yu-Lin Li; Guang-Zhi Ning; Yan Li; Qiu-Li Wu; Jin-Xiu Guo; Hong-Yu Shi; Xiao-Bo Wang; Yong Zhou; Shi-Qing Feng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Assessing the quality of randomized controlled urological trials conducted by korean medical institutions.

Authors:  Jae Hoon Chung; Seung Wook Lee
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-05-14

9.  Graphical tools for network meta-analysis in STATA.

Authors:  Anna Chaimani; Julian P T Higgins; Dimitris Mavridis; Panagiota Spyridonos; Georgia Salanti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Systemic Chemotherapy in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Hee Seung Lee; Seung Woo Park
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 4.519

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cytotoxic effects of gemcitabine-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles in pancreatic cancer cells.

Authors:  Kevin O Affram; Taylor Smith; Edward Ofori; Sunil Krishnan; Patrick Underwood; Jose G Trevino; Edward Agyare
Journal:  J Drug Deliv Sci Technol       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 3.981

2.  EIF5A regulates proliferation and chemoresistance in pancreatic cancer through the sHH signalling pathway.

Authors:  Zheng Wang; Jie Jiang; Tao Qin; Ying Xiao; Liang Han
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 5.310

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.