Literature DB >> 15084616

Phase III trial of gemcitabine plus tipifarnib compared with gemcitabine plus placebo in advanced pancreatic cancer.

E Van Cutsem1, H van de Velde, P Karasek, H Oettle, W L Vervenne, A Szawlowski, P Schoffski, S Post, C Verslype, H Neumann, H Safran, Y Humblet, J Perez Ruixo, Y Ma, D Von Hoff.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether addition of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib (Zarnestra, R115777; Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium) to standard gemcitabine therapy improves overall survival in advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study compared gemcitabine + tipifarnib versus gemcitabine + placebo in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma previously untreated with systemic therapy. Tipifarnib was given at 200 mg bid orally continuously; gemcitabine was given at 1,000 mg/m(2) intravenously weekly x 7 for 8 weeks, then weekly x 3 every 4 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival; secondary end points included 6-month and 1-year survival rates, progression-free survival, response rate, safety, and quality of life.
RESULTS: Six hundred eighty-eight patients were enrolled. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two treatment arms. No statistically significant differences in survival parameters were observed. The median overall survival for the experimental arm was 193 v 182 days for the control arm (P =.75); 6-month and 1-year survival rates were 53% and 27% v 49% and 24% for the control arm, respectively; median progression-free survival was 112 v 109 days for the control arm. Ten drug-related deaths were reported for the experimental arm and seven for the control arm. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia grade > or = 3 were observed in 40% and 15% in the experimental arm versus 30% and 12% in the control arm. Incidences of nonhematologic adverse events were similar in two groups.
CONCLUSION: The combination of gemcitabine and tipifarnib has an acceptable toxicity profile but does not prolong overall survival in advanced pancreatic cancer compared with single-agent gemcitabine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15084616     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.10.112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  224 in total

1.  Aberrant signaling pathways in pancreatic cancer: a two compartment view.

Authors:  Angela L McCleary-Wheeler; Robert McWilliams; Martin E Fernandez-Zapico
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.784

2.  Amide-modified prenylcysteine based Icmt inhibitors: Structure-activity relationships, kinetic analysis and cellular characterization.

Authors:  Jaimeen D Majmudar; Heather B Hodges-Loaiza; Kalub Hahne; James L Donelson; Jiao Song; Liza Shrestha; Marietta L Harrison; Christine A Hrycyna; Richard A Gibbs
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Inhibition of radiation-induced DNA repair and prosurvival pathways contributes to vorinostat-mediated radiosensitization of pancreatic cancer cells.

Authors:  Amit Deorukhkar; Shujun Shentu; Hee Chul Park; Parmeswaran Diagaradjane; Vinay Puduvalli; Bharat Aggarwal; Sushovan Guha; Sunil Krishnan
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.327

4.  Meta-analysis of phase III randomized trials of molecular targeted therapies for advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Karim M Eltawil; Paul D Renfrew; Michele Molinari
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-02-26       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Second-line therapy for gemcitabine-pretreated advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Romain Altwegg; Marc Ychou; Vanessa Guillaumon; Simon Thezenas; Pierre Senesse; Nicolas Flori; Thibault Mazard; Ludovic Caillo; Stéphanie Faure; Emmanuelle Samalin; Eric Assenat
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  PAR-4 as a possible new target for pancreatic cancer therapy.

Authors:  Asfar S Azmi; Philip A Philip; Syed F Zafar; Fazlul H Sarkar; Ramzi M Mohammad
Journal:  Expert Opin Ther Targets       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.902

Review 7.  Molecular biology of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma progression: aberrant activation of developmental pathways.

Authors:  Andrew D Rhim; Ben Z Stanger
Journal:  Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.622

Review 8.  How to Target Activated Ras Proteins: Direct Inhibition vs. Induced Mislocalization.

Authors:  Ethan J Brock; Kyungmin Ji; John J Reiners; Raymond R Mattingly
Journal:  Mini Rev Med Chem       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 3.862

Review 9.  Preclinical Rationale for the Phase III Trials in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Is Wishful Thinking Clouding Successful Drug Development for Pancreatic Cancer?

Authors:  Ramya Thota; Anirban Maitra; Jordan D Berlin
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 10.  Inhibition of Ras for cancer treatment: the search continues.

Authors:  Antonio T Baines; Dapeng Xu; Channing J Der
Journal:  Future Med Chem       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.