Katherine Van Loon1, Anne M Espinoza, David R Fogelman, Robert A Wolff, Milind M Javle, Renuka V Iyer, Vincent J Picozzi, Ludmila Katherine Martin, Tanios Bekaii-Saab, Margaret A Tempero, Nathan R Foster, George P Kim, Andrew H Ko. 1. From the *Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; †Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; ‡Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; §Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA; ∥Division of Medical Oncology, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; ¶Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Health Sciences Research Department, The Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and #Division of Hematology and Oncology, The Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate whether building upon multidrug chemotherapy regimens represents a viable strategy in pancreatic cancer clinical trial design. METHODS: We performed a pooled analysis of all single-arm phase II studies in which a specific targeted agent (the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody bevacizumab) was added to gemcitabine-based cytotoxic doublets. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included objective response rate, CA-19-9 biomarker response rate, and adverse event frequencies. Kaplan-Meier methods estimated time-to-event end points, whereas the Cox proportional hazard model estimated univariate hazard ratios of death. RESULTS: For the 300 patients included in the pooled analysis, median OS was 9.1 months (95% confidence interval, 8.3-10.2). Differences in OS were observed according to patients' baseline performance status (median OS, 10.4 vs 8.6 months for Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0 vs 1, respectively). Moreover, bevacizumab-related adverse events were not observed at increased frequency with gemcitabine-based doublets compared with historic data. CONCLUSIONS: Recognizing the limitations of cross-study comparisons, these results compare favorably to those from Cancer and Leukemia Group B 80303, a phase III trial testing bevacizumab in combination with gemcitabine alone. This is the largest data set available to demonstrate the feasibility of building upon more intensive chemotherapy backbones in clinical trials of novel targeted agents in pancreatic cancer.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate whether building upon multidrug chemotherapy regimens represents a viable strategy in pancreatic cancer clinical trial design. METHODS: We performed a pooled analysis of all single-arm phase II studies in which a specific targeted agent (the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody bevacizumab) was added to gemcitabine-based cytotoxic doublets. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included objective response rate, CA-19-9 biomarker response rate, and adverse event frequencies. Kaplan-Meier methods estimated time-to-event end points, whereas the Cox proportional hazard model estimated univariate hazard ratios of death. RESULTS: For the 300 patients included in the pooled analysis, median OS was 9.1 months (95% confidence interval, 8.3-10.2). Differences in OS were observed according to patients' baseline performance status (median OS, 10.4 vs 8.6 months for Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0 vs 1, respectively). Moreover, bevacizumab-related adverse events were not observed at increased frequency with gemcitabine-based doublets compared with historic data. CONCLUSIONS: Recognizing the limitations of cross-study comparisons, these results compare favorably to those from Cancer and Leukemia Group B 80303, a phase III trial testing bevacizumab in combination with gemcitabine alone. This is the largest data set available to demonstrate the feasibility of building upon more intensive chemotherapy backbones in clinical trials of novel targeted agents in pancreatic cancer.
Authors: Thierry Conroy; Françoise Desseigne; Marc Ychou; Olivier Bouché; Rosine Guimbaud; Yves Bécouarn; Antoine Adenis; Jean-Luc Raoul; Sophie Gourgou-Bourgade; Christelle de la Fouchardière; Jaafar Bennouna; Jean-Baptiste Bachet; Faiza Khemissa-Akouz; Denis Péré-Vergé; Catherine Delbaldo; Eric Assenat; Bruno Chauffert; Pierre Michel; Christine Montoto-Grillot; Michel Ducreux Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-05-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: H A Burris; M J Moore; J Andersen; M R Green; M L Rothenberg; M R Modiano; M C Cripps; R K Portenoy; A M Storniolo; P Tarassoff; R Nelson; F A Dorr; C D Stephens; D D Von Hoff Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1997-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Hedy L Kindler; Gregory Friberg; Deepti A Singh; Gershon Locker; Sreenivasa Nattam; Mark Kozloff; David A Taber; Theodore Karrison; Abraham Dachman; Walter M Stadler; Everett E Vokes Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-11-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Hedy Lee Kindler; Donna Niedzwiecki; Donna Hollis; Susan Sutherland; Deborah Schrag; Herbert Hurwitz; Federico Innocenti; Mary Frances Mulcahy; Eileen O'Reilly; Timothy F Wozniak; Joel Picus; Pankaj Bhargava; Robert J Mayer; Richard L Schilsky; Richard M Goldberg Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-07-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: David Fogelman; Mehrdad Jafari; Gauri R Varadhachary; Henry Xiong; Susie Bullock; Harold Ozer; E Lin; Jeffrey Morris; Patti Cunningham; Bronwyn Bennett; James L Abbruzzese; Robert A Wolff Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2011-04-09 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Fairooz Kabbinavar; Herbert I Hurwitz; Louis Fehrenbacher; Neal J Meropol; William F Novotny; Grazyna Lieberman; Susan Griffing; Emily Bergsland Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-01-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Eric Van Cutsem; Walter L Vervenne; Jaafar Bennouna; Yves Humblet; Sharlene Gill; Jean-Luc Van Laethem; Chris Verslype; Werner Scheithauer; Aijing Shang; Jan Cosaert; Malcolm J Moore Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-03-23 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M Javle; J Yu; C Garrett; A Pande; B Kuvshinoff; A Litwin; J Phelan; J Gibbs; R Iyer Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-06-02 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Shubham Pant; Ludmila K Martin; Susan Geyer; Lai Wei; Katherine Van Loon; Nili Sommovilla; Mark Zalupski; Renuka Iyer; David Fogelman; Andrew H Ko; Tanios Bekaii-Saab Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Andrew H Ko; Noelle LoConte; Margaret A Tempero; Evan J Walker; R Kate Kelley; Stephanie Lewis; Wei-Chou Chang; Emily Kantoff; Michael W Vannier; Daniel V Catenacci; Alan P Venook; Hedy L Kindler Journal: Pancreas Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 3.327