PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: Targeting accuracy at all possible couch angles needs to be carefully evaluated prior to initiating a frameless image-guided stereotactic radiosurgery program on a Linac for treating functional disorders such as trigeminal neuralgia. In this study, we report positioning accuracy with stereoscopic x-ray imaging over the complete range of couch rotation using anthropomorphic head phantoms. MATERIALS/ METHODS: An anthropomorphic head phantom with three 5 mm tungsten BBs as hidden targets was CT simulated. A group of 7 arcs was planned with couch angles from 0 to 90° in 15° increments. A pair of stereoscopic x-ray images that auto-matches to planning CT according to bony anatomy was utilized to position each BB to machine isocenter at all planned couch angles. Targeting accuracy was measured by stereoscopic x-ray imaging of the BB itself, which provides the distance from the centroid of BB to the x-ray imaging isocenter. For each BB, the hidden target test was repeated 5 times at couch 0° and 3 times at other couch angles, resulting in a total of 69 measurements, each with random initial setup deviation. Following the same workflow, a second anthropomorphic head phantom with two 5 mm BBs was utilized to evaluate localization accuracy at couch angles of 0 through 270° in 15° increments, resulting in another 18 measurements. RESULTS: Residual setup deviation following image guidance in the first head phantom was 0.6±0.1, 0.4±0.1, and 0.4±0.1 mm, respectively, at the three BBs, and 0.5±0.1 mm overall (N=69). Comparable results of 0.4±0.1 mm (N=18) were achieved with the second head phantom. Combining results from both phantoms, the targeting accuracy was 0.5±0.1 mm (range 0.2-0.8 mm). No apparent correlation was observed between targeting accuracy and couch rotation. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate positioning within 1 mm can be achieved with stereoscopic x-ray imaging at any couch angle. Frameless image-guided stereotactic radiosurgery could achieve targeting accuracy similar to that of frame-based systems for high dose treatment of trigeminal neuralgia.
PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: Targeting accuracy at all possible couch angles needs to be carefully evaluated prior to initiating a frameless image-guided stereotactic radiosurgery program on a Linac for treating functional disorders such as trigeminal neuralgia. In this study, we report positioning accuracy with stereoscopic x-ray imaging over the complete range of couch rotation using anthropomorphic head phantoms. MATERIALS/ METHODS: An anthropomorphic head phantom with three 5 mm tungsten BBs as hidden targets was CT simulated. A group of 7 arcs was planned with couch angles from 0 to 90° in 15° increments. A pair of stereoscopic x-ray images that auto-matches to planning CT according to bony anatomy was utilized to position each BB to machine isocenter at all planned couch angles. Targeting accuracy was measured by stereoscopic x-ray imaging of the BB itself, which provides the distance from the centroid of BB to the x-ray imaging isocenter. For each BB, the hidden target test was repeated 5 times at couch 0° and 3 times at other couch angles, resulting in a total of 69 measurements, each with random initial setup deviation. Following the same workflow, a second anthropomorphic head phantom with two 5 mm BBs was utilized to evaluate localization accuracy at couch angles of 0 through 270° in 15° increments, resulting in another 18 measurements. RESULTS: Residual setup deviation following image guidance in the first head phantom was 0.6±0.1, 0.4±0.1, and 0.4±0.1 mm, respectively, at the three BBs, and 0.5±0.1 mm overall (N=69). Comparable results of 0.4±0.1 mm (N=18) were achieved with the second head phantom. Combining results from both phantoms, the targeting accuracy was 0.5±0.1 mm (range 0.2-0.8 mm). No apparent correlation was observed between targeting accuracy and couch rotation. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate positioning within 1 mm can be achieved with stereoscopic x-ray imaging at any couch angle. Frameless image-guided stereotactic radiosurgery could achieve targeting accuracy similar to that of frame-based systems for high dose treatment of trigeminal neuralgia.
Authors: Guozhen Luo; Joseph S Neimat; Anthony Cmelak; Austin N Kirschner; Albert Attia; Manuel Morales-Paliza; George X Ding Journal: Pract Radiat Oncol Date: 2016-08-20
Authors: Allison M Campbell; Janis Glover; Veronica L S Chiang; Jason Gerrard; James B Yu Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2015-02-14 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Javad Rahimian; Joseph C Chen; Ajay A Rao; Michael R Girvigian; Michael J Miller; Hugh E Greathouse Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Mischa S Hoogeman; Joost J Nuyttens; Peter C Levendag; Ben J M Heijmen Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-11-08 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Bryan W Goss; Leonardo Frighetto; Antonio A F DeSalles; Zachary Smith; Timothy Solberg; Michael Selch Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Hadi Zahra; Bin S Teh; Arnold C Paulino; Daniel Yoshor; Todd Trask; David Baskin; E Brian Butler Journal: Technol Cancer Res Treat Date: 2009-12