Burden of high blood pressure as a contributing factor to stroke in the Japanese community-based diabetic population.

Diabetes mellitus is characterized by alterations in blood glucose (BG) metabolism, and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) has been widely used as a marker of the BG concentration. Diabetes often coexists with high blood pressure (BP). High BP and hyperglycemia are well-known risk factors of stroke. We examined the extent to which the increased risk of stroke in diabetic individuals is attributable to BP and BG using prospectively collected data from the Japanese general population. During an average 8.3 ± 2.2 years of follow-up, out 1606 diabetic individuals aged ≥40 years who were free of cardiovascular disease, 119 participants (7.4%) developed stroke. In multivariable analysis, a significant difference in the risk of incident stroke was noted among the BP categories, including normotension (BP1), prehypertension (BP2), and hypertension (BP3; P for trend = 0.001). By contrast, no difference was noted among the BG categories, including HbA1c levels <7.0% (HB1), 7.0-7.9% (HB2), and ≥8.0% (HB3; P for trend = 0.430). Compared with the category that included both BP1 and HB1, the population-attributable fraction (PAF) for stroke incidence was 52.0% from the BP2 and BP3 categories and 24.1% from the HB2 and HB3 categories, and the increased incidence from the HB2 and HB3 categories was mostly caused from coexistent BP2 and BP3 categories. In conclusion, in the Japanese community-based diabetic population, concomitant BP elevation largely contributes to the increased incidence of stroke and links BG elevation, as indicated by HbA1c, to the increased risk of stroke.

Introduction

The total number of people with diabetes mellitus worldwide is expected to increase from 382 million in 2013 to 592 million in 2035, and this tendency is projected to be particularly evident among the urban population in developing countries [1]. Furthermore, approximately half of all individuals with diabetes are undiagnosed and have already developed complications, such as chronic renal disease [2]. Thus, determining how to efficiently intervene all types of diabetes, including unrecognized cases, is important to reduce the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD), which is one of the major outcomes of diabetes.

Diabetes is characterized by alterations in blood glucose (BG) metabolism. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is widely used as a marker of average BG concentrations for ~3 months and exhibits advantages compared with glucose tests [3]. Diabetes is an established risk factor for macro- and microvascular disease [4], but the association of HbA1c with macrovascular endpoints, especially stroke, is less stringent than microvascular endpoints in diabetic individuals [5, 6]. Recent studies suggest the importance of BG fluctuation indicated by hypoglycemia and postprandial glycemic elevation as risk factors of future CVD [7, 8]. However, the HbA1c level does not provide a measure of short-term fluctuations of BG and does not necessarily reflect hypoglycemia [9, 10]. On the other hand, hypertension is a common comorbidity of diabetes [11] and a potent predictor of macrovascular disease [12, 13]. In addition, a recent study suggests marked ethnic differences in associations between blood pressure (BP) parameters and stroke and stronger combined effects of hyperglycemia and hypertension in Asians compared with Europeans [14]. Based on these facts, the risk of stroke may be largely attributable to coexisting elevated BP rather than high levels of HbA1c in Asian diabetic individuals. Clarifying this hypothesis could lead to a better focus on diabetic populations at high risk for incident stroke, but these studies have not yet been conducted to date.

The objective of the present study was to investigate the extent to which the increased risk of stroke is attributable to BP and BG indicated by HbA1c in the Japanese community-based diabetic population.

Methods

Study participants

The Iwate-Kenpoku cohort (Iwate-KENCO) study cohort is a population-based prospective study in Japanese residents in three districts (Ninohe, Kuji, and Miyako) of the northern Iwate prefecture, which is located in the northeast of Honsyu, Japan. Details of this cohort are provided elsewhere [15]. Participants were recruited through a government-regulated health checkup program that was conducted between April 2002 and January 2004. Of these participants, 97% individuals (n = 26,469) agreed to participate in this cohort study. In these individuals, diabetic participants (n = 1713) were selected by one or more of the following criteria: (1) a random BG level ≥200 mg/dl or a fasting BG level ≥ 126 mg/dl, (2) a HbA1c (NGSP equivalent value) ≥6.5%, and (3) current anti-diabetic therapy. After the exclusion of 107 participants for the following reasons, including age <40 years (n = 4), missing data at baseline (n = 6), or prevalent CVD (myocardial infarction or stroke; n = 103), a total of 1606 diabetic participants (763 males and 843 females) were included in the analysis.

Outcome

The endpoint of the study was newly diagnosed stroke. Diagnosis of stroke was based on the criteria established for the Monitoring System for Cardiovascular Disease commissioned by the Ministry of Health and Welfare [16]. These criteria correspond with those published by the World Health Organization [17], and stroke was defined as the sudden onset of neurological symptoms. Hospitalized patients with incident stroke were registered from April 2002 to August 2007. Patients with transient ischemic attack and traumatic hemorrhagic stroke were excluded from the registration. Registration was initially performed by attending physicians at all the general public hospitals located in the present study area. Furthermore, to ensure the complete capture of all registrations, physicians or trained research nurses visited those hospitals and reviewed the medical charts and/or discharge summaries. Furthermore, to capture the cases that transferred from the study area to other municipalities, we extended the survey to include all teaching hospitals within neighboring municipalities around the study area. The government of Iwate prefecture and the Iwate Medical Association implemented a stroke registration program with other organizations [18]. The study was approved by our institutional ethics committee, and all participants provided written informed consent.

Measurement

Body mass index (BMI) was calculated by dividing weight (in kilograms) by the square of height (in meters). Participants completed a self-report questionnaire to document their medical history, including current medications and lifestyle factors, such as smoking habits. BP was measured twice using an automatic digital sphygmomanometer after at least 5 minutes of rest in a sitting position, and the average of these two values was used for analysis. Both fasting (n = 374) and non-fasting (n = 1232) blood samples were drawn from an antecubital vein and collected into vacuum tubes containing a serum separator gel. Tubes were stored immediately after sampling in an icebox and were transported to the laboratory <8 h after collection. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using CKD-EPI equations modified by a Japanese coefficient [19]. HbA1c levels were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography using an automated glycohemoglobin analyzer (TOSOH HLC-723G7, Japan) as standardized by the Japan Diabetes Society (JDS). HbA1c values were converted to National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP) values, which were calculated with the following formula: HbA1c (NGSP) (%) = 1.02 × HbA1c (JDS) (%) + 0.25 (%) [20]. Serum concentrations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol were measured using an enzymatic homogeneous assay Cholestest-LDL (Daiichi Chemicals Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan). Serum concentrations of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations were measured using an enzymatic method. Dyslipidemia was defined as total cholesterol levels ≥240 mg/dl, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels <40 mg/dl, and/or current lipid lowering therapy. Smoking habits were defined based on current smoking behavior.

BP and BG classification

According to baseline BP levels, participants were classified into the following three groups according to the Seventh Report of the Joint National Commission (JNC-7): normotension (BP1) defined as systolic BP < 120 mmHg and diastolic BP < 80 mmHg; prehypertension (BP2) defined as systolic BP ≥ 120 mmHg but <140 mmHg or diastolic BP ≥ 80 mmHg but < 90 mmHg; hypertension (BP3) defined as either systolic BP ≥ 140 mmHg or diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg [21]. This classification was also applied to individuals with anti-hypertensive agents use. Further, participants were classified into the following three groups according to baseline HbA1c levels: HbA1c; <7.0% (HB1), 7.0 to 7.9% (HB2) and ≥8.0% (HB3). This classification was also applied to individuals treated with anti-diabetic medication.

Statistical analysis

The baseline data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) or percentage. Analysis of covariance and logistic regression with adjustments for CVD risk factors at baseline were conducted to compare means and proportions, respectively, across the BP and BG categories. Comparison of continuous variables was performed by one-way analysis of variance. χ2 test was used for comparison of categorical variables.

A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, including age, sex, BMI, eGFR, dyslipidemia (yes or no), smoking habits (yes or no), and anti-hypertensive and anti-diabetic medications (yes or no), was constructed. A Cox regression analysis was conducted to estimate the effect of the BP and BG categories on the incidence of stroke. This analysis was also conducted separately according to sex, age (above or below 70 years), and status of anti-diabetic medication. The attributable risks for incidence of stroke from the BP and BG categories were estimated using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. To estimate the attributable risk, the population-attributable fraction (PAF) was calculated as Pe × [hazard ratio (HR)−1]/HR, in which Pe is the proportion of incident cases in each risk category and HR is the full multiple-adjusted HR. Further, to compare the combined effect of BP and HbA1c categories on incident risk of stroke, the HR and PAF for stroke incidence among the combination category of BP (BP1, BP2, and BP3) and BG (HB1, HB2, and HB3) were computed.

All data were analyzed with SPSS statistical software version 22.0 (IBM Japan, Tokyo, Japan). P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

The present diabetic cohort consisted of 52.5% females, 39.8% elderly participants (≥70 years), and 46.4% participants undergoing treatment with anti-diabetic medication. Table 1 presents the baseline characteristics of study participants according to the BP and BG categories. Participants were likely to exhibit an increased prevalence of elevated BP categories given that 75.3% of total participants were included in the BP2 or BP3 category. Inversely, the prevalence of participants classified in the HB2 or HB3 category was likely to be lower.

Table 1

Baseline characteristics of study participants according to the risk categories of blood pressure and glucose

	Blood pressure category				Blood glucose category
	BP1	BP2	BP3	P value	HB1	HB2	HB3	P value
Number	397	580	629		876	393	337
Sex (men)	40.8%	48.3%	51.0%	0.005	49.2%	45.5%	45.4%	0.331
Age (years)	64.4 ± 9.7	66.0 ± 8.7	67.1 ± 8.6	<0.001	66.7 ± 8.9	66.3 ± 8.6	63.9 ± 9.2	<0.001
Body mass index (kg/m2)	24.3 ± 3.8	25.1 ± 3.5	25.6 ± 3.9	<0.001	25.0 ± 3.7	25.3 ± 3.8	25.3 ± 3.9	<0.001
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)	109.7 ± 7.2	129.5 ± 5.9	154.0 ± 13.0	<0.001	134.2 ± 20.0	133.7 ± 19.5	135.0 ± 20.9	<0.001
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)	66.5 ± 6.6	75.2 ± 6.4	86.0 ± 9.0	<0.001	77.1 ± 10.7	76.8 ± 10.8	78.4 ± 11.1	<0.001
HbA1c (NGSP, %)	7.3 ± 1.6	7.2 ± 1.3	7.2 ± 1.4	<0.001	6.3 ± 0.6	7.4 ± 0.3	9.3 ± 1.3	<0.001
Dyslipidemia	19.4%	14.8%	17.2%	0.168	16.0%	14.5%	22.0%	0.016
Estimated GFR (ml/min/1.73 m2)	77.0 ± 11.1	74.9 ± 10.9	74.7 ± 10.6	0.011	74.4 ± 10.6	74.8 ± 11.4	78.6 ± 10.3	0.011
Current smoking	17.6%	14.7%	15.7%	0.455	15.6%	15.5%	16.6%	0.901
Medication for diabetes	45.3%	50.2%	43.6%	0.063	40.3%	50.6%	57.3%	<0.001
Medication for hypertension	14.1%	22.4%	27.2%	<0.001	23.2%	23.2%	18.7%	0.214
HbA1c category				0.895				<0.001
<7.0% (HB1)	53.9%	54.3%	55.2%
7.0–7.9% (HB2)	26.2%	24.3%	23.5%
≥8.0% (HB3)	19.9%	21.4%	21.3%
Blood pressure categorya								0.895
Normotension (BP1)					24.4%	26.5%	23.4%
Prehypertension (BP2)					36.0%	35.9%	36.8%
Hypertension (BP3)					39.6%	37.7%	39.8%

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation or percentage. Dyslipidemia was defined as total cholesterol levels ≥240 mg/dl, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels <40 mg/dl, and/or current lipid lowering therapy

BP blood pressure, HB HbA1c, GFR glomerular filtration rate

aBlood pressure categories was defined as follows: normotension: systolic BP  120  mmHg and diastolic BP  80  mmHg; prehypertension: systolic BP ≥120  mmHg but 140  mmHg or diastolic BP ≥  80 mmHg but  90  mmHg; hypertension: either systolic BP ≥140  mmHg or diastolic BP ≥90  mmHg

During the average 8.3 ± 2.2 years of follow-up, 119 (7.4%) participants developed stroke, including cerebral infarction (n = 77), intracerebral hemorrhage (n = 32), subarachnoid hemorrhage (n = 7), and cryptogenic stroke (n = 3). As shown in Table 2, in a multivariable analysis, a significant difference in the risk of incident stroke was noted among the BP categories (P for trend = 0.001). By contrast, no difference was noted among the BG categories (P for trend = 0.430). These results were similar to separate analyses based on sex, age, or diabetic medical status (Fig. 1).

Table 2

Hazard ratios for stroke events according to the risk categories of blood pressure and glucose in diabetic population

	No. of subjects	No. of events	No./1,000 person years	Sex and age adjusted HR and 95% CI		P value	P for trend	Multivariable-adjusted HRa and 95% CI		P value	P for trend
Blood pressure category							0.001				0.001
Normotension	397	13	3.8	1.00				1.00
Prehypertension	580	38	7.9	1.86	0.99–3.50	0.054		1.85	0.98–3.50	0.056
Hypertension	629	68	13.4	2.94	1.62–5.34	0.000		2.87	1.57–5.26	0.001
HbA1c category							0.409				0.430
<7.0%	876	65	9.0	1.00				1.00
7.0%–7.9%	393	27	8.1	0.97	0.62–1.52	0.884		0.98	0.63–1.55	0.945
≥8.0%	337	27	9.8	1.33	0.84–2.09	0.220		1.33	0.84–2.12	0.224

HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval

aHazard ratio in a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model including age, sex, body mass index, estimated glomerular filtration rate, dyslipidemia (yes or no), smoking habits (yes or no), and anti-hypertensive and anti-diabetic medications (yes or no)

Fig. 1

Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios for the incidence of stroke according to the categories of sex, age, and status of anti-diabetic medication. BP1: normotension; BP2: prehypertension; BP3: hypertension; HB1: HbA1c < 7.0%; HB2: HbA1c from 7.0 to 7.9%; HB3: HbA1c ≥ 8.0%

Figure 2 presents the HRs and PAFs for stroke incidence in the combination category of BP (BP1, BP2, and BP3) and BG (HB1, HB2, and HB3). The population-attributable fraction (PAF) for stroke incidence was 44.7% in total from the BP2 and BP3 categories and 21.0% in total from the HB2 and HB3 categories compared with the category with both BP1 and HB1. In addition, regardless of the BG categories, the increased incidence of stroke was mostly caused by the BP2 and BP3 categories. By contrast, regardless of the BG categories, the increased incidence of stroke was mostly caused from the BP2 and BP3 categories, in contrast to being little caused from the BP1 category (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2

Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios and the population-attributable fractions for the incidence of stroke in the combination category of blood pressure and glucose. BP1: normotension; BP2: prehypertension; BP3: hypertension; HB1: HbA1c < 7.0%; HB2: HbA1c from 7.0 to 7.9%; HB3: HbA1c ≥ 8.0%. Dot areas represent the population-attributable fraction for incident stroke from exposure for each risk category at baseline.*Hazard ratios were compared with the category with both BP1 and HB1

Discussion

The key finding in the present study is that in the Japanese community-based diabetic population, approximately half of stroke events were attributed to an increased incidence due to the prehypertensive and hypertensive categories, and this attribution to BP elevation was more than twice as large as that to HbA1c elevation (≥7.0%). In addition, the increased incidence of stroke from elevated HbA1c categories was mostly caused by the coexistence of elevated BP categories. These results suggest that concomitant BP elevation largely contributes to stroke incidence and links BG elevation indicated by HbA1c to the excessive risk of stroke in a diabetic population.

HbA1c has been shown to be a predictor for the risk of CVD incidence in prospective studies [22-27]. However, in the Women’s Health Study, HbA1c did not predict the risk of CVD events independent of traditional CVD risk factors, leading the authors to suggest the involvement of factors other than HbA1c might affect CVD risk [28]. Several recent studies have indicated that glycemic variability plays a role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and may be an independent risk factor for cardiovascular complications in diabetic patients [29-31]. In a cohort at risk for diabetes, postchallenge plasma glucose and glycemic spikes were more strongly associated with carotid atherosclerosis than HbA1c levels [31]. Further, in populations of Asian origin, 2-hour plasma glucose after a glucose tolerance test was superior to fasting plasma glucose for prediction of CVD mortality [32]. However, the changes in glucose concentration from before to after a meal are poorly correlated with HbA1c in contrast to fasting and mean plasma glucose concentrations, which are highly correlated with HbA1c [9]. These evidence may account for no significant difference in the risk of stroke among the HbA1c categories in the present study. In addition, low HbA1c levels are associated with the increased risk of cardiac events and mortality among type 2 diabetic patients with BG-lowering treatment [33]. This evidence may also partly explain the lack of an association between HbA1c and stroke events among our study participants undergoing anti-diabetic medical treatment.

Previous studies have demonstrated the close relationship between BP and subclinical atherosclerosis or incident stroke in diabetes [12, 13, 34]. In Korean subjects with HbA1c ≥ 6.5%, hypertension affected intracranial arterial stenosis to a greater extent than glycemia indicated by HbA1c [34]. The Framingham Heart Study reported that compared with normotension, hypertension was associated with a 57% increase in the risk of stroke events in diabetic individuals [12]. The burden of elevated BP on incident stroke may account for the increased prevalence of the elevated BP category in the diabetic population. Participants in the present study exhibited an increased prevalence of the categories with elevated BP (36 and 39% in the BP2 and BP3 categories, respectively) in contrast to a reduced prevalence of the categories with higher HbA1c levels (24 and 21% in the HB2 and HB3 categories, respectively; Table 1). These results were consistent with previous reports demonstrating that diabetic individuals were composed of 31% prehypertensive and 34–58% hypertensive individuals [12, 35, 36]. The coexistence of diabetes and elevated BP are partly mediated through the presence of insulin resistance, chronic activation of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system, the sympathetic nervous system, and abnormalities associated with innate immunity, inflammation, and oxidative stress [37]. These proatherogenic effects may reflect BP-related risk of stroke.

Previous epidemiological studies have demonstrated the combined effect of prehypertension or hypertension and diabetes on the incidence of CVD [13, 35, 36]. In Framingham participants with diabetes, the increased risk of stroke is more attributable to concomitant hypertension [12]. In observational data from UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) participants stratified by BP and HbA1c categories, high BP (systolic BP ≥ 150 mmHg) tended to be associated with a more increased risk of stroke compared with hyperglycemia (HbA1c ≥ 8.0%) [13]. For the first time, the present study reveals that the excess risk of stroke related to increased BG was mostly attributable to concomitant BP elevation. Our results may partly account for the minimal benefits on stroke incidence due to reductions in BG in recent clinical trials for diabetic individuals [38]. In the post-trial 10-year follow-up for the UKPDS participants, no significant risk reductions in stroke were observed in the intensive BG-lowering group [39]. By contrast, BP reduction confers substantial clinical benefits on stroke incidence. In the observational data from UKPDS participants, tight BP control reduced the risk of stroke to levels comparable to that of microvascular disease [40]. In a randomized clinical trial for type 2 diabetic patients at high risk of CVD, targeting a systolic BP of less than 120 mmHg compared with less than 140 mmHg reduced 41% of stroke events, which was a component of the primary outcome [41]. These clinical data are generally consistent with our finding that the removal of coexistent prehypertension and hypertension from diabetes would reduce 45% of stroke events. In the present subanalysis, the multivariable HR for stroke events in diabetic participants with baseline systolic BP levels ≥ 130 mmHg or diastolic BP levels ≥ 80 mmHg was 1.79 (95% confidence interval: 1.18 to 2.72, P < 0.01), and the PAF from these participants was 32.7% (data not shown). Therefore, compliance with the current Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines of the Management of Hypertension (JSH 2014) [42], which sets 130/80 mmHg as a target BP level for diabetic patients, would lead to an approximately one-third reduction in stroke events.

The present study had several limitations. First, Iwate prefecture in which the present study was conducted is an area that is characterized by high salt intake and high incidence rates of stroke [43, 44]. Our diabetic cohort had 9.0 events of stroke per 1000 person-year, which was nearly comparable to those in other diabetic cohorts, such as the Suita cohort (8.9 events per 1000 person-year) [5, 6] and the Framingham cohort (11.1 events per 1000 person-year) [12]. However, the dietary habits in our cohort (salt intake: 16.2 g and 12.8 g per day in men and women, respectively) [43] might enhance the contribution of BP to the risk of stroke. Second, the present study targets both diabetic individuals with and without ant-diabetic medical treatment who exhibit a difference in diagnosed duration of diabetes and arteriosclerosis progression. The factors that our study could not estimate could influence the relation between BP or BG and the risk of stroke. However, this relation did not differ between our cohorts with and without anti-diabetic medical treatment, suggesting that this limitation would minimally influence our results. Third, the present study set a reference group of HbA1c levels of <7.0%, which was presented as a reasonable HbA1c goal by the American Diabetes Association [45]. Baseline HbA1c levels in this reference group increased compared with those set in the other studies [5, 13]. However, also when classified into the following four categories, baseline HbA1c;<6.0%, 6.0–6.9%, 7.0–7.9%, and ≥8.0%, HbA1c did not stratify the risk of stroke in the present cohort given that the full-adjusted HRs of incident stroke events for HbA1c increases were 1.00, 1.19, 1.15, and 1.52, respectively (P for trend = 0.614, data not shown). Therefore, this limitation would minimally influence the present HbA1c-related risk of incident stroke. Fourth, the present study did not analyze the association of BP or BG with different stroke types, e.g., hemorrhagic stroke, because the cumulative incidence of hemorrhagic stroke was low [n = 36 (2.4%)]. In subanalysis, which targeted ischemic stroke as an endpoint, the HR was increased in the prehypertensive and hypertensive categories [3.03 (95%CI, 1.25–7.33), 3.60 (95% CI, 1.51–8.58), respectively] in contrast to categories with HbA1c levels of 7.0–7.9% and ≥8.0% (data not shown). Fifth, among the present participants, our study did not identify an assortment of the diabetes therapeutic drugs at baseline and the clinical data and prescribed drugs during the follow-up. Therefore, we could not clarify whether this fact influenced our results. Finally, although we extended the survey to the teaching hospitals of several remote municipalities around the study area, it is possible that the identification of some cases that were admitted to medical facilities outside the survey system of the Iwate Stroke Registry was insufficient. Therefore, this insufficiency could lead to an underestimation of our results.

In conclusion, in the Japanese community-based diabetic population, concomitant BP elevation largely contributes to the increased incidence of stroke and links BG elevation indicated by HbA1c to the increased stroke risk.