BACKGROUND: Available data suggest that hemoglobin A(1c) (A(1c)), also known as glycosylated hemoglobin, levels may be related to cardiovascular risk in the general population without diabetes mellitus. We sought to test this hypothesis prospectively in a cohort of women without overt cardiovascular disease. METHODS: We conducted a nested case-control study of the Women's Health Study cohort. We identified 464 case patients with incident myocardial infarction, stroke, or coronary revascularization and 928 unmatched control subjects who remained free of cardiovascular events at case diagnosis. The mean follow-up was 7 years. RESULTS: Of the overall study population, 136 had a history of diabetes mellitus or an overtly elevated baseline A(1c) level (>6.4%) and were excluded from the primary analyses. Among women without diabetes mellitus or an elevated baseline A(1c) level, mean +/- SD baseline levels of A(1c) were significantly higher among future cases than controls (5.47% +/- 0.27% vs 5.37% +/- 0.22%; P<.001). The crude relative risks (RRs) of incident cardiovascular events for increasing quartiles of A(1c) were 1.00, 0.98, 1.33, and 2.25 (95% confidence interval [CI] for the highest vs the lowest quartile, 1.59-3.18). The A(1c) levels correlated with several other traditional cardiovascular risk factors, and in fully adjusted models, the predictive effect of A(1c) was attenuated and not significant (RR for the highest vs the lowest quartile, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.65-1.54). In contrast, in the population including women with diabetes mellitus at enrollment, diabetes mellitus (RR, 4.97; 95% CI, 2.81-8.77) remained a strong independent determinant of cardiovascular risk in fully adjusted analyses, while A(1c) levels did not (RR for the highest vs the lowest quartile, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.73-1.71). CONCLUSIONS: The A(1c) level is associated with future cardiovascular risk among women without diabetes mellitus, but this relationship is largely attributable to a strong correlation with other cardiovascular risk factors. In contrast, diabetes mellitus is a strong independent determinant of cardiovascular risk, even after adjustment for A(1c) levels.
BACKGROUND: Available data suggest that hemoglobin A(1c) (A(1c)), also known as glycosylated hemoglobin, levels may be related to cardiovascular risk in the general population without diabetes mellitus. We sought to test this hypothesis prospectively in a cohort of women without overt cardiovascular disease. METHODS: We conducted a nested case-control study of the Women's Health Study cohort. We identified 464 case patients with incident myocardial infarction, stroke, or coronary revascularization and 928 unmatched control subjects who remained free of cardiovascular events at case diagnosis. The mean follow-up was 7 years. RESULTS: Of the overall study population, 136 had a history of diabetes mellitus or an overtly elevated baseline A(1c) level (>6.4%) and were excluded from the primary analyses. Among women without diabetes mellitus or an elevated baseline A(1c) level, mean +/- SD baseline levels of A(1c) were significantly higher among future cases than controls (5.47% +/- 0.27% vs 5.37% +/- 0.22%; P<.001). The crude relative risks (RRs) of incident cardiovascular events for increasing quartiles of A(1c) were 1.00, 0.98, 1.33, and 2.25 (95% confidence interval [CI] for the highest vs the lowest quartile, 1.59-3.18). The A(1c) levels correlated with several other traditional cardiovascular risk factors, and in fully adjusted models, the predictive effect of A(1c) was attenuated and not significant (RR for the highest vs the lowest quartile, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.65-1.54). In contrast, in the population including women with diabetes mellitus at enrollment, diabetes mellitus (RR, 4.97; 95% CI, 2.81-8.77) remained a strong independent determinant of cardiovascular risk in fully adjusted analyses, while A(1c) levels did not (RR for the highest vs the lowest quartile, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.73-1.71). CONCLUSIONS: The A(1c) level is associated with future cardiovascular risk among women without diabetes mellitus, but this relationship is largely attributable to a strong correlation with other cardiovascular risk factors. In contrast, diabetes mellitus is a strong independent determinant of cardiovascular risk, even after adjustment for A(1c) levels.
Authors: April P Carson; Caroline S Fox; Darren K McGuire; Emily B Levitan; Martin Laclaustra; Devin M Mann; Paul Muntner Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2010-10-05
Authors: Jennifer Lin; Paul M Ridker; Aruna Pradhan; I-Min Lee; JoAnn E Manson; Nancy R Cook; Julie E Buring; Shumin M Zhang Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Amy B Kauffman; Thomas Delate; Kari L Olson; Alicia A Cymbala; Kara A Hutka; Sheila L Kasten; Jon R Rasmussen Journal: Clin Drug Investig Date: 2008 Impact factor: 2.859
Authors: Silmara Ao Leite; Robyn L Anderson; David M Kendall; Arlene M Monk; Richard M Bergenstal Journal: Diabetol Metab Syndr Date: 2009-09-16 Impact factor: 3.320
Authors: Brian H Chen; Yiqing Song; Eric L Ding; Christian K Roberts; JoAnn E Manson; Nader Rifai; Julie E Buring; J Michael Gaziano; Simin Liu Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2008-10-28 Impact factor: 17.152