Alexa K Johnson1, Riann M Palmieri-Smith1,2, Lindsey K Lepley3. 1. School of Kinesiology and. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 3. Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs; UCONN Health, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Farmington.
Abstract
CONTEXT: To quantify quadriceps weakness after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), researchers have often analyzed only peak torque. However, analyzing other characteristics of the waveform, such as the rate of torque development (RTD), time to peak torque (TTP), and central activation ratio (CAR), can lend insight into the underlying neuromuscular factors that regulate torque development. OBJECTIVE: To determine if interlimb neuromuscular asymmetry was present in patients with ACLR at the time of clearance to return to activity. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 10 individuals serving as controls (6 men, 4 women; age = 23.50 ±3.44 years, height = 1.73 ± 0.09 m, mass = 71.79 ± 9.91 kg) and 67 patients with ACLR (43 men, 24 women; age = 21.34 ± 5.73 years, height = 1.74 ± 0.11 m, mass = 77.85 ± 16.03 kg, time postsurgery = 7.52 ± 1.36 months) participated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Isokinetic (60°/s) and isometric quadriceps strength were measured. Peak torque, TTP, and RTD were calculated across isometric and isokinetic trials, and CAR was calculated from the isometric trials via the superimposed burst. Repeated-measures analyses of variance were used to compare limbs in the ACLR and control groups. RESULTS: No between-limbs differences were detected in the control group ( P > .05). In the ACLR group, the involved limb demonstrated a longer TTP for isokinetic strength ( P = .04; Cohen d effect size [ES] = 0.18; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.16, 0.52), lower RTD for isometric ( P < .001; Cohen d ES = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.38, 1.08) and isokinetic ( P < .001; Cohen d ES = 0.84; 95% CI = 0.49, 1.19) strength, lower CAR ( P < .001; Cohen d ES = 0.37; 95% CI = 0.03, 0.71), and lower peak torque for isometric ( P < .001; Cohen d ES = 1.28; 95% CI = 0.91, 1.65) and isokinetic ( P < .001; Cohen d ES = 1.15; 95% CI = 0.78, 1.52) strength. CONCLUSIONS: Interlimb asymmetries at return to activity after ACLR appeared to be regulated by several underlying neuromuscular factors. We theorize that interlimb asymmetries in isometric and isokinetic quadriceps strength were associated with changes in muscle architecture. Reduced CAR, TTP, and RTD were also present, indicating a loss of motor-unit recruitment or decrease in firing rate.
RCT Entities:
CONTEXT: To quantify quadriceps weakness after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), researchers have often analyzed only peak torque. However, analyzing other characteristics of the waveform, such as the rate of torque development (RTD), time to peak torque (TTP), and central activation ratio (CAR), can lend insight into the underlying neuromuscular factors that regulate torque development. OBJECTIVE: To determine if interlimb neuromuscular asymmetry was present in patients with ACLR at the time of clearance to return to activity. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 10 individuals serving as controls (6 men, 4 women; age = 23.50 ± 3.44 years, height = 1.73 ± 0.09 m, mass = 71.79 ± 9.91 kg) and 67 patients with ACLR (43 men, 24 women; age = 21.34 ± 5.73 years, height = 1.74 ± 0.11 m, mass = 77.85 ± 16.03 kg, time postsurgery = 7.52 ± 1.36 months) participated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Isokinetic (60°/s) and isometric quadriceps strength were measured. Peak torque, TTP, and RTD were calculated across isometric and isokinetic trials, and CAR was calculated from the isometric trials via the superimposed burst. Repeated-measures analyses of variance were used to compare limbs in the ACLR and control groups. RESULTS: No between-limbs differences were detected in the control group ( P > .05). In the ACLR group, the involved limb demonstrated a longer TTP for isokinetic strength ( P = .04; Cohen d effect size [ES] = 0.18; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.16, 0.52), lower RTD for isometric ( P < .001; Cohen d ES = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.38, 1.08) and isokinetic ( P < .001; Cohen d ES = 0.84; 95% CI = 0.49, 1.19) strength, lower CAR ( P < .001; Cohen d ES = 0.37; 95% CI = 0.03, 0.71), and lower peak torque for isometric ( P < .001; Cohen d ES = 1.28; 95% CI = 0.91, 1.65) and isokinetic ( P < .001; Cohen d ES = 1.15; 95% CI = 0.78, 1.52) strength. CONCLUSIONS: Interlimb asymmetries at return to activity after ACLR appeared to be regulated by several underlying neuromuscular factors. We theorize that interlimb asymmetries in isometric and isokinetic quadriceps strength were associated with changes in muscle architecture. Reduced CAR, TTP, and RTD were also present, indicating a loss of motor-unit recruitment or decrease in firing rate.
Authors: Paul W Kline; Kristin D Morgan; Darren L Johnson; Mary Lloyd Ireland; Brian Noehren Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2015-08-14 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Jeremy P Loenneke; Daeyeol Kim; Christopher A Fahs; Robert S Thiebaud; Takashi Abe; Rebecca D Larson; Debra A Bemben; Michael G Bemben Journal: Muscle Nerve Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 3.217
Authors: Derek N Pamukoff; Brian Pietrosimone; Michael D Lewek; Eric D Ryan; Paul S Weinhold; Dustin R Lee; J Troy Blackburn Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2016-02-08 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Steven M Davi; Adam S Lepley; Craig R Denegar; Lindsay J DiStefano; Corey M Edgar; Lindsey K Lepley Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2020-06-23 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Sarah A Scheurer; David A Sherman; Neal R Glaviano; Christopher D Ingersoll; Grant E Norte Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2020-01-02 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: Christiana J Raymond-Pope; Donald R Dengel; John S Fitzgerald; Bradley J Nelson; Tyler A Bosch Journal: Int J Sports Med Date: 2020-10-23 Impact factor: 3.118
Authors: Atle Hole Saeterbakken; Tom Erik J Solstad; David G Behm; Nicolay Stien; Matthew Peter Shaw; Helene Pedersen; Vidar Andersen Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2020-08-27 Impact factor: 3.078