Literature DB >> 33096577

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructed Female Athletes Exhibit Relative Muscle Dysfunction After Return to Sport.

Christiana J Raymond-Pope1, Donald R Dengel1, John S Fitzgerald2, Bradley J Nelson3, Tyler A Bosch4.   

Abstract

We sought to examine the relationship between upper-leg compartmental lean mass, muscle-specific strength, and explosive strength following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Twleve adolescent female athletes with prior anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were individually-matched by age (16.4±0.9 vs. 16.4±1.0 yrs.), body mass index (23.2±2.1 vs. 23.2±2.7 kg/m2), and sport to 12 female athlete controls. One total-body and 2 lateral-leg dual X-ray absorptiometry scans measured total/segmental body composition. Isokinetic dynamometry measured knee extensor/flexor peak torque. Squat jumps on force platforms measured bilateral peak vertical ground reaction force. Paired t-tests assessed lean mass, peak torque, and force between previously-injured athletes' legs and between previously-injured and control athletes' legs. Previously-injured athletes' involved vs. non-involved leg demonstrated lower total (7.13±0.75 vs. 7.43±0.99 kg; p<0.01) and anterior (1.49±0.27 vs. 1.61±0.23 kg; p<0.01) and posterior (1.90±0.19 vs. 2.02±0.21 kg; p=0.04) upper-leg lean mass. Involved leg peak torque (1.36±0.31; 1.06±0.27; 0.97±0.19 Nm/kg) was lower vs. non-involved leg (1.71±0.36; 1.24±0.33; 1.04±0.15 Nm/kg; p<0.01-0.02) for extension at 60 and 120°/sec and flexion at 60°/sec and vs. controls' 'matched' leg (1.77±0.40 Nm/kg; p=0.01) for extension at 60°/sec. Involved leg force (296±45N) was lower vs. non-involved leg (375±55N; p<0.01) and vs. controls' 'matched' leg (372±88N; p=0.02). One-year post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, adolescent female athletes' involved leg demonstrated relative muscle dysfunction. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33096577      PMCID: PMC8379942          DOI: 10.1055/a-1273-8269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Med        ISSN: 0172-4622            Impact factor:   3.118


  40 in total

1.  Changes in weight-bearing following injury or surgical reconstruction of the ACL: relationship to quadriceps strength and function.

Authors:  Terese L Chmielewski; Kevin E Wilk; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  Contribution of Neuromuscular Factors to Quadriceps Asymmetry After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Alexa K Johnson; Riann M Palmieri-Smith; Lindsey K Lepley
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Simple decision rules can reduce reinjury risk by 84% after ACL reconstruction: the Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort study.

Authors:  Hege Grindem; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; Håvard Moksnes; Lars Engebretsen; May Arna Risberg
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 4.  A systematic review of the psychological factors associated with returning to sport following injury.

Authors:  Clare L Ardern; Nicholas F Taylor; Julian A Feller; Kate E Webster
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  Association of Compartmental Leg Lean Mass Measured by Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry With Force Production.

Authors:  Christiana J Raymond-Pope; Donald R Dengel; John S Fitzgerald; Tyler A Bosch
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Electromyographic predictors of residual quadriceps muscle weakness after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Malachy P McHugh; Timothy F Tyler; Michael G Browne; Gilbert W Gleim; Stephen J Nicholas
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  What is the Evidence for and Validity of Return-to-Sport Testing after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Kate E Webster; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 8.  Risk of Secondary Injury in Younger Athletes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amelia J Wiggins; Ravi K Grandhi; Daniel K Schneider; Denver Stanfield; Kate E Webster; Gregory D Myer
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Limb asymmetries in landing and jumping 2 years following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Mark V Paterno; Kevin R Ford; Gregory D Myer; Rachel Heyl; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.638

10.  Psychological factors are important to return to pre-injury sport activity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: expect and motivate to satisfy.

Authors:  Sofi Sonesson; Joanna Kvist; Clare Ardern; Annika Österberg; Karin Grävare Silbernagel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  1 in total

1.  New Frontiers of Body Composition in Sport.

Authors:  Henry Lukaski; Christiana J Raymond-Pope
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 2.997

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.