Literature DB >> 2965134

Clinical efficacy and safety of teicoplanin.

W Stille1, W Sietzen, H A Dieterich, J J Fell.   

Abstract

This was an open efficacy and safety study in 310 hospitalized patients (187 male and 123 female) with infection by Gram-positive bacteria. The age range was 12-88 years (mean 49.8 years), and 80 of the patients were older than 65 years. Teicoplanin was given either by fast iv or by im injection, in most cases at a dose of 200 or 400 mg every 24 h with an initial dose of 400 mg. For both routes of administration the mean total daily dose was 286 +/- 5 mg/day. The mean duration of treatment was 8.2 days (range 1-37 days). The infections comprised 133 skin or soft tissue, 53 joint or bone, 40 urinary tract, 39 upper respiratory tract, 21 lower respiratory tract, nine septicaemia, four gastro-intestinal tract and 11 miscellaneous. All Gram-positive bacteria isolated were sensitive to teicoplanin. Teicoplanin was the sole antimicrobial agent given in 269 of the 310 patients. Clinical cure occurred in 79.7%, and improvement in 13.6%. Adverse events related to teicoplanin occurred in 7.7% of the patients. Most were minor and in only six patients was treatment discontinued because of adverse events (three allergy, two bronchospasm, one tremor). The laboratory values and audiometry indices in 67 patients showed no significant changes. Teicoplanin was considered an effective and well-tolerated treatment for Gram-positive infections in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2965134     DOI: 10.1093/jac/21.suppl_a.69

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  12 in total

1.  Activity of vancomycin, teicoplanin and cephalosporins against penicillin-susceptible and penicillin-intermediate Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Authors:  V G Loo; J Lavallée; D McAlear; H G Robson
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  1995-03

Review 2.  Teicoplanin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic potential.

Authors:  D M Campoli-Richards; R N Brogden; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Teicoplanin: 10 years of clinical experience.

Authors:  M Trautmann; H Wiedeck; M Ruhnke; M Oethinger; R Marre
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.553

4.  Comparative in vitro activities of teicoplanin, daptomycin, ramoplanin, vancomycin, and PD127,391 against blood isolates of gram-positive cocci.

Authors:  D Shonekan; D Mildvan; S Handwerger
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Efficacy and pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  B Beckers; H P Brodersen; R M Stolpmann; G Jansen; D Larbig
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.553

6.  Teicoplanin alone or combined with rifampin compared with vancomycin for prophylaxis and treatment of experimental foreign body infection by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  H J Schaad; C Chuard; P Vaudaux; F A Waldvogel; D P Lew
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Randomized prospective study comparing vancomycin with teicoplanin in the treatment of infections associated with Hickman catheters.

Authors:  S R Smith; J Cheesbrough; R Spearing; J M Davies
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Clinical efficacy and safety of teicoplanin in the treatment of gram-positive infections.

Authors:  P Kempf; H Pompetzki; A Oppermann; R Wittenberger; J Siebert; J J Fell; H A Dieterich
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.553

9.  Teicoplanin versus vancomycin for prophylaxis of experimental Enterococcus faecalis endocarditis in rats.

Authors:  J M Entenza; T Calandra; Y Moosmann; R Malinverni; M P Glauser
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Treatment of severe sepsis in bone marrow transplant recipients with teicoplanin in combination with beta-lactams and aminoglycosides.

Authors:  A A Fauser; E Lang; G Dölken; K J Bross; J Schmid; F Sörgel
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.