Literature DB >> 2529814

Randomized prospective study comparing vancomycin with teicoplanin in the treatment of infections associated with Hickman catheters.

S R Smith1, J Cheesbrough, R Spearing, J M Davies.   

Abstract

In 72 episodes of suspected or proven Hickman-catheter-associated infection occurring in 59 patients with various hematological disorders, patients were assigned to treatment with either vancomycin or teicoplanin in a randomized nonblinded prospective study. Of 60 episodes evaluable for response, 28 were treated with vancomycin and 32 were treated with teicoplanin. Sixteen infective episodes were microbiologically documented in the vancomycin group, and twenty-one were microbiologically documented in the teicoplanin group. Microbiologically and clinically documented infections treated with vancomycin had an 80% response rate, compared with a 69% response rate for those treated with teicoplanin (P = 0.316). Adverse events occurred in nine (25%) of the episodes in the vancomycin group, compared with three (8%) in the teicoplanin group (P = 0.044). Teicoplanin may provide an effective alternative to vancomycin in the treatment of Hickman-catheter-associated infection in patients with hematological malignancies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2529814      PMCID: PMC172623          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.33.8.1193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  30 in total

1.  Poor efficacy of teicoplanin in treatment of deep-seated staphylococcal infections.

Authors:  N Galanakis; H Giamarellou; N Vlachogiannis; C Dendrinos; G K Daikos
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Technique for placement of a permanent home hyperalimentation catheter.

Authors:  D M Heimbach; T D Ivey
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1976-10

3.  Prolonged venous access for chemotherapy by means of the Hickman catheter.

Authors:  W P Reed; K A Newman; C de Jongh; J C Wade; S C Schimpff; P H Wiernik; J S McLaughlin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1983-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Infectious complications of right atrial catheters used for venous access in patients receiving intensive chemotherapy.

Authors:  E B Larson; M Wooding; R O Hickman
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1981-09

5.  Double-blind comparison of the nephrotoxicity and auditory toxicity of gentamicin and tobramycin.

Authors:  C R Smith; J J Lipsky; O L Laskin; D B Hellmann; E D Mellits; J Longstreth; P S Lietman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1980-05-15       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  A prospective study of prolonged central venous access in leukemia.

Authors:  J L Abrahm; J L Mullen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1982-12-03       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Bacteremias and fungemias in oncologic patients with central venous catheters: changing spectrum of infection.

Authors:  J N Lowder; H M Lazarus; R H Herzig
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1982-08

8.  Use of modified subcutaneous right-atrial catheter for venous access in leukaemic patients.

Authors:  H A Blacklock; M V Pillai; R S Hill; J R Matthews; A G Clarke; J F Wade
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1980-05-10       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Staphylococcus epidermidis: an increasing cause of infection in patients with granulocytopenia.

Authors:  J C Wade; S C Schimpff; K A Newman; P H Wiernik
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Retrospective study of the toxicity of preparations of vancomycin from 1974 to 1981.

Authors:  B F Farber; R C Moellering
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  19 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of vancomycin for the treatment of patients with gram-positive infections: focus on the study design.

Authors:  Konstantinos Z Vardakas; Michael N Mavros; Nikolaos Roussos; Matthew E Falagas
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 2.  A survey of the use of teicoplanin in patients with haematological malignancies and solid tumours.

Authors:  J M Davies
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.553

3.  Clinical efficacy of teicoplanin.

Authors:  P Calain; F Waldvogel
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Treatment of bone, joint, and vascular-access-associated gram-positive bacterial infections with teicoplanin.

Authors:  R N Greenberg
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Teicoplanin plus ciprofloxacin versus gentamicin plus piperacillin in the treatment of febrile neutropenic patients.

Authors:  S M Kelsey; B Weinhardt; P W Collins; A C Newland
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 6.  Glycopeptides and nephrotoxicity.

Authors:  A W Chow; R M Azar
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 7.  Teicoplanin: 10 years of clinical experience.

Authors:  M Trautmann; H Wiedeck; M Ruhnke; M Oethinger; R Marre
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 8.  Anti-infective treatment in intensive care: the role of glycopeptides.

Authors:  R N Grüneberg; A P Wilson
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Teicoplanin: a well-tolerated and easily administered alternative to vancomycin for gram-positive infections in intensive care patients.

Authors:  P Charbonneau; I Harding; J J Garaud; J Aubertin; F Brunet; Y Domart
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 10.  Use of teicoplanin in community medicine.

Authors:  A P Wilson; R N Grüneberg
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.