Literature DB >> 2525529

Clinical efficacy and safety of teicoplanin in the treatment of gram-positive infections.

P Kempf1, H Pompetzki, A Oppermann, R Wittenberger, J Siebert, J J Fell, H A Dieterich.   

Abstract

This study was an open efficacy and safety study of teicoplanin in hospitalized patients with gram-positive infections. 26 patients entered the study. Teicoplanin was administered by intravenous bolus injection at a dose of 200 mg or 400 mg every 24 h, and in all cases an initial loading dose of 400 mg was given. The mean duration of treatment was 9.4 days (range four to 20 days). The infections included 18 skin/soft tissue, four lower respiratory tract, two urinary tract and two joint/bone. Clinical cure and improvement occurred in 20 of the 26 patients. Only two adverse events (moderate diarrhoea and mild pain at injection site) related to teicoplanin occurred in one patient. It was concluded that teicoplanin was effective and well tolerated in the treatment of gram-positive infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2525529     DOI: 10.1007/bf01644026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infection        ISSN: 0300-8126            Impact factor:   3.553


  16 in total

1.  Bactericidal activity of teicoplanin in an in-vitro two-compartment kinetic model.

Authors:  R Pallanza; R Scotti; V Arioli
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  In vitro evaluation of teicoplanin and other antimicrobials against streptococci group D bacteria.

Authors:  S Breyer; A Georgopoulos; W Graninger
Journal:  Drugs Exp Clin Res       Date:  1987

3.  Clinical efficacy and safety of teicoplanin.

Authors:  W Stille; W Sietzen; H A Dieterich; J J Fell
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  Pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin in man after intravenous administration.

Authors:  G L Traina; M Bonati
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1984-04

5.  Metronidazole in pulmonary anaerobic infection.

Authors:  P Nigam; K K Kapoor; R K Gupta; A K Gupta; B M Goyal
Journal:  J Assoc Physicians India       Date:  1983-12

6.  The therapeutic use of metronidazole in anaerobic infection: six years' experience in a London hospital.

Authors:  S J Eykyn
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Comparative in vitro study of teichomycin A2.

Authors:  V Fainstein; B LeBlanc; G P Bodey
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  In vitro activity of teichomycin A 2 in comparison with penicillin and vancomycin against gram-positive cocci.

Authors:  A Bauernfeind; C Petermüller
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  Teichomycin: in-vitro and in-vivo evaluation in comparison with other antibiotics.

Authors:  R Pallanza; M Berti; B P Goldstein; E Mapelli; E Randisi; R Scotti; V Arioli
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  Metronidazole vs clindamycin treatment of anerobic pulmonary infection. Failure of metronidazole therapy.

Authors:  C A Perlino
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1981-10
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Teicoplanin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic potential.

Authors:  D M Campoli-Richards; R N Brogden; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 9.546

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.