Literature DB >> 29644466

Minimally invasive esophagectomy attenuates the postoperative inflammatory response and improves survival compared with open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.

Kotaro Yamashita1, Masayuki Watanabe2, Shinji Mine1, Tasuku Toihata1, Ian Fukudome1, Akihiko Okamura1, Masami Yuda1, Masaru Hayami1, Naoki Ishizuka3, Yu Imamura1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for patients with esophageal cancer has recently spread worldwide. However, whether MIE is less invasive has not yet been fully evaluated.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 551 patients who underwent curative esophagectomy for esophageal cancer from 2005 to 2014: 145 patients underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and 406 patients underwent open transthoracic esophagectomy (OE). We compared postoperative CRP levels with propensity score matching. In addition, long-term outcomes were also compared between the groups.
RESULTS: Operative time was significantly longer, and intraoperative blood loss was significantly less in the MIE group compared with the OE group. Although the incidence of postoperative complications was similar between the 2 groups, postoperative serum CRP levels during the first 3 and 5 postoperative days and peak postoperative CRP levels were significantly lower after MIE versus OE (MIE vs. OE, median, 15.21 vs. 19.50 mg/dl; P < 0.001). The MIE group had significantly more favorable disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates than the OE group (3-year DFS rate, 81.7 vs. 69.3%, log-rank P = 0.021; 3-year OS rate, 89.9 vs. 79.2%, log-rank P = 0.007). MIE was an independent prognostic factor for patients with esophageal cancer. The incidence of regional lymph node recurrence was lower in the MIE group.
CONCLUSIONS: MIE significantly attenuated postoperative serum CRP levels compared with OE. MIE could contribute to improved survival.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disease-free survival; Inflammatory response; Minimally invasive esophagectomy; Serum C-reactive protein

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29644466     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6187-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  25 in total

1.  Postoperative Infectious Complications are Associated with Adverse Oncologic Outcomes in Esophageal Cancer Patients Undergoing Preoperative Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Kotaro Yamashita; Tomoki Makino; Hiroshi Miyata; Yasuhiro Miyazaki; Tsuyoshi Takahashi; Yukinori Kurokawa; Makoto Yamasaki; Kiyokazu Nakajima; Shuji Takiguchi; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Survival After Esophagectomy: A Propensity-Matched Study of Different Surgical Approaches.

Authors:  Benny Weksler; Jennifer L Sullivan
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Bernard M Smithers; David C Gotley; Ian Martin; Janine M Thomas
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Surgery alone versus chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for stage I and II esophageal cancer: final analysis of randomized controlled phase III trial FFCD 9901.

Authors:  Christophe Mariette; Laetitia Dahan; Françoise Mornex; Emilie Maillard; Pascal-Alexandre Thomas; Bernard Meunier; Valérie Boige; Denis Pezet; William B Robb; Valérie Le Brun-Ly; Jean-François Bosset; Jean-Yves Mabrut; Jean-Pierre Triboulet; Laurent Bedenne; Jean-François Seitz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Surya S A Y Biere; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Kirsten W Maas; Luigi Bonavina; Camiel Rosman; Josep Roig Garcia; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Markus W Hollmann; Elly S M de Lange; H Jaap Bonjer; Donald L van der Peet; Miguel A Cuesta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Using a Nationwide Database in Japan.

Authors:  Hiroya Takeuchi; Hiroaki Miyata; Soji Ozawa; Harushi Udagawa; Harushi Osugi; Hisahiro Matsubara; Hiroyuki Konno; Yasuyuki Seto; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Radical lymph node dissection for cancer of the thoracic esophagus.

Authors:  H Akiyama; M Tsurumaru; H Udagawa; Y Kajiyama
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  A randomized Phase III trial of thoracoscopic versus open esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG1409.

Authors:  Kozo Kataoka; Hiroya Takeuchi; Junki Mizusawa; Masahiko Ando; Yasuhiro Tsubosa; Kazuo Koyanagi; Hiroyuki Daiko; Satoru Matsuda; Kenichi Nakamura; Ken Kato; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  Postoperative peak serum C-reactive protein predicts outcome of hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Hiroaki Shiba; Kenei Furukawa; Yuki Fujiwara; Yasuro Futagawa; Koichiro Haruki; Shigeki Wakiyama; Yuichi Ishida; Takeyuki Misawa; Katsuhiko Yanaga
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.480

10.  Low invasiveness of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches between thoracoscopic and open esophagectomy.

Authors:  Shinsuke Kanekiyo; Shigeru Takeda; Masahito Tsutsui; Mitsuo Nishiyama; Masahiro Kitahara; Yoshitaro Shindo; Yukio Tokumitsu; Shinobu Tomochika; Yoshihiro Tokuhisa; Michihisa Iida; Kazuhiko Sakamoto; Nobuaki Suzuki; Shigeru Yamamoto; Shigefumi Yoshino; Shoichi Hazama; Tomio Ueno; Hiroaki Nagano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  13 in total

1.  Inflammatory response and recurrence after minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Akihiko Okamura; Kotaro Yamashita; Ryotaro Kozuki; Keita Takahashi; Tasuku Toihata; Yu Imamura; Shinji Mine; Masayuki Watanabe
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Single-Port Inflatable Mediastinoscopy Combined With Laparoscopic-Assisted Small Incision Surgery for Radical Esophagectomy Is an Effective and Safe Treatment for Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Xiaojin Wang; Xiaojian Li; Hua Cheng; Bin Zhang; Hongcheng Zhong; Ruiqi Wang; Beilong Zhong; Qingdong Cao
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Population-Based Cohort Study from a Prospective National Registry: Better Long-Term Survival in Esophageal Cancer After Minimally Invasive Compared with Open Transthoracic Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Masaru Hayami; Nelson Ndegwa; Mats Lindblad; Gustav Linder; Jakob Hedberg; David Edholm; Jan Johansson; Jesper Lagergren; Lars Lundell; Magnus Nilsson; Ioannis Rouvelas
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 4.339

4.  Use of C-reactive protein for the early prediction of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: Systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alberto Aiolfi; Emanuele Asti; Emanuele Rausa; Giulia Bonavina; Gianluca Bonitta; Luigi Bonavina
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Essential Updates 2018/2019: Essential Updates for esophageal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Seto
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2020-02-18

6.  Lymph node dissection around left recurrent laryngeal nerve: robot-assisted vs. video-assisted McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Duan; Jie Yue; Chuangui Chen; Lei Gong; Zhao Ma; Xiaobin Shang; Zhentao Yu; Hongjing Jiang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Severe weight loss after minimally invasive oesophagectomy is associated with poor survival in patients with oesophageal cancer at 5 years.

Authors:  Yasufumi Koterazawa; Taro Oshikiri; Gosuke Takiguchi; Naoki Urakawa; Hiroshi Hasegawa; Masashi Yamamoto; Shingo Kanaji; Kimihiro Yamashita; Takeru Matsuda; Tetsu Nakamura; Satoshi Suzuki; Yoshihiro Kakeji
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Matched-pair comparisons of minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Feiyu Liu; Tao Hu; Chaoyang Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Right Compared With Left Thoracic Approach Esophagectomy for Patients With Middle Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yan Zheng; Yin Li; Xianben Liu; Ruixiang Zhang; Haibo Sun; Wenqun Xing
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 10.  Minimally invasive techniques for transthoracic oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  K Siaw-Acheampong; S K Kamarajah; R Gujjuri; J R Bundred; P Singh; E A Griffiths
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2020-09-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.