Literature DB >> 24982463

Surgery alone versus chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for stage I and II esophageal cancer: final analysis of randomized controlled phase III trial FFCD 9901.

Christophe Mariette1, Laetitia Dahan2, Françoise Mornex2, Emilie Maillard2, Pascal-Alexandre Thomas2, Bernard Meunier2, Valérie Boige2, Denis Pezet2, William B Robb2, Valérie Le Brun-Ly2, Jean-François Bosset2, Jean-Yves Mabrut2, Jean-Pierre Triboulet2, Laurent Bedenne2, Jean-François Seitz2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although often investigated in locally advanced esophageal cancer (EC), the impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) in early stages is unknown. The aim of this multicenter randomized phase III trial was to assess whether NCRT improves outcomes for patients with stage I or II EC.
METHODS: The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points were disease-free survival, postoperative morbidity, in-hospital mortality, R0 resection rate, and prognostic factor identification. From June 2000 to June 2009, 195 patients in 30 centers were randomly assigned to surgery alone (group S; n = 97) or NCRT followed by surgery (group CRT; n = 98). CRT protocol was 45 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks with two courses of concomitant chemotherapy composed of fluorouracil 800 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2). We report the long-term results of the final analysis, after a median follow-up of 93.6 months.
RESULTS: Pretreatment disease was stage I in 19.0%, IIA in 53.3%, and IIB in 27.7% of patients. For group CRT compared with group S, R0 resection rate was 93.8% versus 92.1% (P = .749), with 3-year overall survival rate of 47.5% versus 53.0% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.99; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.40; P = .94) and postoperative mortality rate of 11.1% versus 3.4% (P = .049), respectively. Because interim analysis of the primary end point revealed an improbability of demonstrating the superiority of either treatment arm (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.59; P = .66), the trial was stopped for anticipated futility.
CONCLUSION: Compared with surgery alone, NCRT with cisplatin plus fluorouracil does not improve R0 resection rate or survival but enhances postoperative mortality in patients with stage I or II EC.
© 2014 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24982463     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.6532

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  162 in total

1.  Controlling lymph node micrometastases by neoadjuvant chemotherapy affects the prognosis in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Yoko Hiraki; Yutaka Kimura; Motohiro Imano; Hiroaki Kato; Mitsuru Iwama; Osamu Shiraishi; Atsushi Yasuda; Masayuki Shinkai; Tomoki Makino; Masaaki Motoori; Makoto Yamasaki; Hiroshi Miyata; Takao Satou; Taroh Satoh; Hiroshi Furukawa; Masahiko Yano; Yuichiro Doki; Takushi Yasuda
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2020-06-28       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Novel Calculator to Estimate Overall Survival Benefit from Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Patients with Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Emmanuel Gabriel; Kristopher Attwood; Rupen Shah; Steven Nurkin; Steven Hochwald; Moshim Kukar
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2017-01-29       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Patients with Non-response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Esophageal Cancer Have No Survival Advantage over Patients Undergoing Primary Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Guillaume S Chevrollier; Danica N Giugliano; Francesco Palazzo; Scott W Keith; Ernest L Rosato; Nathaniel R Evans Iii; Adam C Berger
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Predictors of Nodal Metastases for Clinical T2N0 Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Arianna Barbetta; Francisco Schlottmann; Tamar Nobel; David B Sewell; Meier Hsu; Kay See Tan; Hans Gerdes; Pari Shah; Manjit S Bains; Matthew Bott; James M Isbell; David R Jones; Daniela Molena
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Patients with Gastro-esophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: a Retrospective Cohort Study in Iran.

Authors:  Farshid Farhan; Reza Ghalehtaki; Shiva Mahdavi-Seresht; Alipasha Meysamie; Maisa Yamrali; Borna Farazmand; Negin Mohammadi; Ehsan Saraee; Mohammad-Reza Mir; Ali Mir; Marzieh Lashkari; Samaneh Salarvand; Ebrahim Esmati; Farhad Samiei
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2019-12

6.  Change in volume parameters induced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy provide accurate prediction of overall survival after resection in patients with oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Dietmar Tamandl; Richard M Gore; Barbara Fueger; Patrick Kinsperger; Michael Hejna; Matthias Paireder; Alexander Haug; Sebastian F Schoppmann; Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Oesophageal cancer in 2014: Advances in curatively intended treatment.

Authors:  Jesper Lagergren
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 8.  Robot-Assisted Esophagectomy After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation-Current Status and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Ashish Goel; Vikash Nayak
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-09-25

9.  Salvage esophagectomy for persistent or recurrent disease after definitive chemoradiation.

Authors:  Stephen G Swisher; Jenifer Marks; David Rice
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-03

10.  Cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: an 8th edition staging primer.

Authors:  Claire L Donohoe; Alexander W Phillips
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.