| Literature DB >> 29642523 |
Huawei Zhang1, Ziping Zhao2, Jianwei Chen3, Xuelian Bai4, Hong Wang5.
Abstract
Bioassay-guided fractionation of the crude extract of fermentation broth of one symbiotic strain Aspergillus sp. D from the coastal plant Edgeworthia chrysantha Lindl. led to isolation of one new meroterpenoid, tricycloalternarene 14b (1), together with four known analogs (2-5), tricycloalternarenes 2b (2), 3a (3), 3b (4), and ACTG-toxin F (5). Their chemical structures were unambiguously established on the basis of NMR, mass spectrometry, and optical rotation data analysis, as well as by comparison with literature data. Biological assays indicated that compound 2 exhibited potent in vitro cytotoxicity against human lung adenocarcinoma A549 cell line with an IC50 value of 2.91 μM, and compound 5 had a moderate inhibitory effect on Candida albicans, with an MIC value of 15.63 μM. The results indicated that this symbiotic strain D is an important producer of tricycloalternarene derivatives, with potential therapeutic application in treatment of cancer and pathogen infection.Entities:
Keywords: Aspergillus sp.; Edgeworthia chrysantha Lindl.; coastal plant; meroterpenoid; symbiotic microbe; tricycloalternarene
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29642523 PMCID: PMC6017176 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23040855
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Chemical structures of compounds 1–5.
The 1H-NMR (500 MHz) and 13C-NMR (500 MHz) data of compound 1 (in CDCl3).
| Position | 1 | 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| δH ( | δC | δH ( | δC | |
| 1 | 1.29 (3H, s) | 29.8 | 3.95 (2H, s) | 68.7 |
| 2 | 70.7 | 135.2 | ||
| 2′ | 1.29 (3H, s) | 29.8 | 1.62 (3H, s) | 23.2 |
| 3 | 5.59 (H, d, 15.6) | 139.6 | 5.25 (H, t, 7.6) | 125.4 |
| 4 | 5.50 (H, m) | 125.2 | 2.01 (2H, m) | 24.9 |
| 5 | 1.97 (H, m) | 27.8 | 1.50 (2H, m) | 34.6 |
| 6 | 2.08 (H, m) | 32.8 | 1.90 (H, m) | 31.1 |
| 6′ | 0.96, (3H, d, 6.9) | 19.4 | 0.96 (3H, d, 6.9) | 13.7 |
| 7 | 149.7 | 150.0 | ||
| 8 | 5.33 (H, s) | 120.4 | 5.34 (H, s) | 119.9 |
| 9 | 2.43 (H, m) | 44.9 | 2.36 (H, m) | 45.1 |
| 10 | 88.3 | 88.8 | ||
| 10′ | 1.43 (3H, s) | 23.4 | 1.45 (3H, s) | 20.2 |
| 11 | 2.75 (H, m) | 46.3 | 2.77 (H, m) | 46.5 |
| 12 | 2.49 (H, m) | 15.4 | 2.17 (H, m) | 14.9 |
| 13 | 105.2 | 105.1 | ||
| 14 | 171.8 | 172.9 | ||
| 15 | 2.34 (H, m) | 29.3 | 2.37 (m) | 27.8 |
| 16 | 1.77 (H, m) | 37.3 | 1.73 (H, m) | 29.4 |
| 17 | 4.04 (H, dd, 12.9, 5.4) | 71.6 | 4.02 (H, dd, 12.9, 5.4) | 71.0 |
| 18 | 197.8 | 197.8 | ||
Figure 2Key 1H−1H COSY and HMBC correlations of 1.
Figure 3Strong NOESY correlations observed in 1.