BACKGROUND: Sudden cardiac death is the most frequent death mechanism in Chagas disease, responsible for 55% to 65% of the deaths of patients with chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy (CCC). The most often involved electrophysiological mechanisms are ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation. The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) has a beneficial role in preventing sudden death due to malignant ventricular arrhythmias, and, thus the correct identification of patients at risk is required. The association of microvolt T-wave alternans (MTWA) with the appearance of ventricular arrhythmias has been assessed in different heart diseases. The role of MTWA is mostly unknown in patients with CCC. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between MTWA and the occurrence of malignant ventricular arrhythmias in patients with CCC. METHOD: This is a case-control study including patients with CCC and ICD, with history of malignant ventricular arrhythmias (case group), and patients with CCC and no history of those arrhythmias (control group). The MTWA test results were classified as negative and non-negative (positive and indeterminate). The significance level adopted was a = 0.05. RESULTS: We recruited 96 patients, 45 cases (46.8%) and 51 controls (53.1%). The MTWA test was non-negative in 36/45 cases (80%) and 15/51 controls (29.4%) [OR = 9.60 (95%CI: 3.41 - 27.93)]. After adjustment for known confounding factors in a logistic regression model, the non-negative result continued to be associated with malignant ventricular arrhythmias [OR = 5.17 (95%CI: 1.05 - 25.51)]. CONCLUSION: Patients with CCC and history of malignant ventricular arrhythmias more often have a non-negative MTWA test as compared to patients with no history of arrhythmia.
BACKGROUND:Sudden cardiac death is the most frequent death mechanism in Chagas disease, responsible for 55% to 65% of the deaths of patients with chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy (CCC). The most often involved electrophysiological mechanisms are ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation. The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) has a beneficial role in preventing sudden death due to malignant ventricular arrhythmias, and, thus the correct identification of patients at risk is required. The association of microvolt T-wave alternans (MTWA) with the appearance of ventricular arrhythmias has been assessed in different heart diseases. The role of MTWA is mostly unknown in patients with CCC. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between MTWA and the occurrence of malignant ventricular arrhythmias in patients with CCC. METHOD: This is a case-control study including patients with CCC and ICD, with history of malignant ventricular arrhythmias (case group), and patients with CCC and no history of those arrhythmias (control group). The MTWA test results were classified as negative and non-negative (positive and indeterminate). The significance level adopted was a = 0.05. RESULTS: We recruited 96 patients, 45 cases (46.8%) and 51 controls (53.1%). The MTWA test was non-negative in 36/45 cases (80%) and 15/51 controls (29.4%) [OR = 9.60 (95%CI: 3.41 - 27.93)]. After adjustment for known confounding factors in a logistic regression model, the non-negative result continued to be associated with malignant ventricular arrhythmias [OR = 5.17 (95%CI: 1.05 - 25.51)]. CONCLUSION:Patients with CCC and history of malignant ventricular arrhythmias more often have a non-negative MTWA test as compared to patients with no history of arrhythmia.
Chagas disease remains a challenge of great importance in Brazil and Latin America,
and is an emerging concern in North America and European countries.[1] It is considered to be endemic in 21
countries, infects 6 to 7 million people worldwide,[2] accounting for the death of around 12,000 patients
per year.[3]Chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy (CCC) is the most important presentation of Chagas
disease, because of its high frequency, severity and great impact on morbidity and
mortality. Chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy has a wide range of manifestations, such as
heart failure, conduction blocks, thromboembolic events and sudden death.[4],[5] Sudden death is the most common
mechanism of death of those patients, occurs in the presence or absence of advanced
heart disease, and can be the first manifestation of the disease. The
electrophysiological mechanisms most frequently involved are the ventricular
arrhythmias: sustained ventricular tachycardia and ventricular
fibrillation.[4],[6]Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has a great impact on the prevention of
sudden death due to malignant ventricular arrhythmias.[7],[8] The use of the ICD in secondary prevention is well accepted
in CCC, despite the lack of large studies, based on the results obtained from other
populations.[7],[9] However, its use in primary prevention is still controversial
because of the high cost, intrinsic risks in implantation, and adverse
effects.[10],[11] Therefore, identifying patients with CCC at risk for sudden
death due to malignant ventricular arrhythmias is necessary.The microvolt T-wave alternans (MTWA) test is a non-invasive test associated with the
appearance of ventricular tachyarrhythmias assessed in different clinical conditions
with a high negative predictive value to identify patients at risk.[12]-[17] That test recognizes fluctuations
of the T-wave morphology and amplitude beat to beat, measured in microvolts. Those
fluctuations reflect space-temporal heterogeneity of ventricular repolarization,
which is considered a predisposing condition to the beginning and perpetuation of
ventricular arrhythmias.It is worth noting the association of MTWA with malignant arrhythmias in several
clinical conditions, but few studies have included patients with CCC. This study was
aimed at assessing the possible association between MTWA and malignant ventricular
arrhythmias in Chagas disease.
Method
Study
This is an observational, case-control study, approved by the Ethics Committee in
Research of the Federal University of Minas Gerais (COEP 7918/12). The patients
were recruited between 2011 and 2014.
Patients
The sample consists of patients diagnosed with CCC being followed up at the
Hospital das Clínicas of the Federal University of Minas Gerais
(HC-UFMG). The individuals agreed to participate and provided written informed
consent. Patients should be older than 18 years, have a positive serology for
Chagas disease and meet all the diagnostic criteria for CCC, which include
asymptomatic structural heart disease with typical electrocardiographic
changes,[18] or heart
failure with preserved or reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF),
with current or previous symptoms.The case group consisted of patients with CCC and history of malignant
ventricular arrhythmia, with indication for ICD implantation for secondary
prophylaxis and authorization issued by the High-Complexity Commission of the
Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS), according to the ordinance # 152, of
March 8, 2007,[19] updated by
the ordinance # 1, of January 2, 2014.[20] Patients with CCC and no previous history of malignant
ventricular arrhythmia comprised the control group.According to the ordinance # 152, of March 8, 2007, the major indications for ICD
implantation in Brazil are as follows:[19]Individuals resuscitated from documented cardiac arrest due to
tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation of non-reversible cause,
with LVEF ≤ 35% or structural heart disease;Spontaneous, sustained ventricular tachycardia, of non-reversible
cause, with LVEF ≤ 35%;On the electrophysiological study, syncope of undetermined etiology
with induction of hemodynamically unstable sustained ventricular
tachycardia, or clinically relevant ventricular fibrillation with
LVEF ≤ 35% or structural heart disease.Individuals with the following characteristics were excluded from the study:
difficulty to walk on the treadmill; NYHA functional class IV heart failure;
atrial fibrillation or flutter; pacemaker dependency. In addition, individuals
with absolute contraindications to undergo exercise test, such as cardiac
arrhythmias leading to hemodynamic instability, decompensated heart failure and
acute non-cardiac conditions that could be aggravated by physical exercise, were
excluded from the study.[21]
Microvolt T-wave alternans test
The individuals included in this study underwent a medical interview with a
standard questionnaire, physical examination and transthoracic echocardiography.
Left ventricular ejection fraction was calculated by use of the Simpson's
method. Later, the patients underwent the MTWA test, at the ergometry sector of
the Hospital das Clínicas of the UFMG.For performing the MTWA test, the following items were used: Micro-V Alternans
SensorsTM of Cambridge Heart high-resolution electrodes, which
minimize noise and artifacts; the Cambridge Heart - HearTwave software for
analysis and report; and a treadmill. Chronically used medications were
maintained.The MTWA test consists in proper preparation with skin cleansing and removal of
the superficial layer of dead cells by use of abrasion, placement of electrodes
in the 12 standard electrocardiographic leads and in the 3 orthogonal leads (X,
Y and Z).Data from the electrocardiographic tracing were collected at rest, during
exertion on the treadmill, and during the recovery phase. During exertion, the
patient should reach a heart rate between 100 and 110 beats per minute (bpm) and
sustain it for 2 minutes and 30 seconds. Then, heart rate between 110 and 120
bpm should be reached and sustained for 1 minute and 30 seconds. For the test to
be considered valid, target heart rate should be maintained for at least 60% of
the determined time period.The software provides an analysis with measurement of MTWA, characterizing the
test as positive, negative or indeterminate. The positive test consists in
T-wave alternans with amplitude ≥ 1.9 µV sustained for at least 1
minute, with an initial heart rate < 110 bpm or at rest, in an orthogonal
lead or two adjacent precordial leads. The negative test does not detect any
significant T-wave alternans for 1 minute with a heart rate ≥ 105 bpm, if
there is no impairment to the tracing due to noise or more than 10% of ectopic
beats.[22],[23] The tests that do not meet any of those criteria are
considered indeterminate. The indeterminate tests attributed to noise were
repeated. Then the tests were grouped as negative or non-negative (positive and
indeterminate), based on studies about the impact of the indeterminate test on
the outcome of ventricular arrhythmias. An indeterminate test due to patient's
factors, such as impossibility to keep heart rate between 105 and 110 bpm,
frequent extrasystoles and MTWA not sustained for 1 minute, is associated with
the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias similarly to the way the positive test
is.[24]
Sample calculation
The sample was calculated with the Power and Sample Size Calculations
software.[25]
Considering that Barbosa et al.[26] have found non-negative results in 81.8% of the Chagas
disease patients wearing an ICD, estimating that those without malignant
ventricular arrhythmia would have 30% less non-negative MWTA tests (57%), for a
power of 80% and alpha error of 5%, we found 50 patients in each group.
Statistical analysis
Initially, the case and control groups were compared regarding their clinical
characteristics by use of Fisher exact test. The variables tested were sex, age
(older or younger than 60 years), reduced or preserved LVEF, and beta-blocker
use. There was a significant disparity between the groups, and to assess the
association between MTWA and the occurrence of malignant ventricular
arrhythmias, multiple logistic regression models were adjusted, including the
potential confounding covariables. The covariables age and LVEF were entered
into the model continuously. The model calibration was assessed by use of
Hosmer-Lemeshow test. The results were expressed as odds ratio (OR) with its
respective confidence interval. The significance level adopted was α =
0.05. All analyses were performed with the R statistical software, 3.3.2
version.[27]
Result
This study recruited 96 patients with CCC as follows: 45 patients (46.8%) with an
ICD, constituting the case group; and 51 (53.1%) without an ICD and no known history
of ventricular arrhythmia, constituting the control group. Table 1 describes the sample. Of the total sample, 48 patients
(50%) were of the male sex, 42.2% of the case group and 53.1% of the control group,
p = 0.220. Of the patients with an ICD, 57.8% were older than 60 years, while of
those with no ICD, only 1.96% were older than 60 years, p < 0.001. Of the total
sample, 37 patients had reduced LVEF (38.5%), 31 patients (68.9%) in the case group,
and 6 patients (19.6%) in the control group, p < 0.001. In addition, the
distribution of beta-blocker users was as follows: 37 patients in the case group
(82.2%), and 10 patients in the control group (19.6%), p < 0.001.
Table 1
Characteristics of the sample.
All (96)
Case group (45)
Control group (51)
p
Number of patients
96
45
51
-
Male sex *
48
19
29
0.220
Mean age (years)
55
62
49
-
Age > 60 years *
27
26
1
< 0.001
Mean ejection fraction (%)
48,8
39
58
-
Reduced ejection fraction (< 45%) *
37
31
6
< 0.001
Beta-blocker use *
47
37
10
< 0.001
Number of patients
Characteristics of the sample.Number of patientsThe MTWA test had a non-negative result in 51 patients (53.1%) as follows: 36/45
patients (80%) in the case group and 15/51 patients (29.4%) in the control group, OR
= 9.60 (95%CI: 3.41 - 27.93). Because of the difference in characteristics between
the groups, a logistic regression model was created to correct the disparities
between them, including age, sex, LVEF and beta-blocker use. Table 2 shows the results of data analysis.
Table 2
Factors related to the presence of ventricular arrhythmias in the
multivariate logistic regression model.
Factors related to the presence of ventricular arrhythmias in the
multivariate logistic regression model.LL: lower limit; UL: upper limit; MWTA: microvolt T-wave alternans; LVEF:
left ventricular ejection fraction.The model showed that the difference is statistically significant between the case
and control groups regarding the result of the MTWA test [OR = 5.17 (95%CI:
1.05 - 25.51)]. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed good calibration of the model
(p = 0.872).
Discussion
In this case-control study with adjustments for other significant variables, we
observed the association between the non-negative result of the MTWA test and the
occurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with CCC, with OR = 5.17
(95%CI: 1.05 - 25.51), suggesting that MTWA may play a role in the assessment of the
risk for sudden death of patients with Chagas heart disease.The occurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias seems more common in Chagas disease
than in heart diseases of other etiologies.[4] However, there is neither a method nor a score to properly
identify patients at risk for sudden death due to those arrhythmias.The MTWA test has been widely studied in heart diseases of several etiologies, and
countless studies have evidenced the association between the non-negative result of
the test and the occurrence of malignant ventricular arrhythmias.[13]-[17] The present study corroborates
previous studies from our search group that have suggested a role for MTWA in the
stratification of risk for sudden death in CCC.Initially, Ribeiro et al. have observed that the T-wave amplitude variability
measured in 11-minute high-resolution ECG tracings - a phenomenon analogous to MTWA
- related to higher risk of death in patients with CCC after following 113 patients
up at an outpatient clinic for 106 months [HR = 5.76 (95%CI:
1.31-25.23)].[28] In
a subsequent study, Raadschilders et al. have demonstrated a higher occurrence of
non-negative MTWA test among patients with CCC as compared to individuals with
Chagas disease but no heart impairment and patients with negative serology for
Chagas disease.[29] Barbosa et al.,
performing the test in patients with indication for ICD implantation and diagnosed
with Chagas heart disease and heart diseases of other etiologies, have assessed the
association between MTWA and the occurrence of the outcomes 'proper therapy' and
'death'. Those authors have concluded that there is a relationship between a
non-negative (positive and indeterminate) MTWA test and higher occurrence of proper
therapy during the follow up of patients with Chagas disease, which was not observed
among patients with heart disease of other etiologies. For patients with CCC, the
test had sensitivity and negative predictive value of 100%.[26]The higher occurrence of an altered MTWA test in CCC can be explained by the
inflammatory and fibrosing nature of the disease. Chagas heart disease is a chronic
myocarditis, with damage to the tissue of the cardiac chambers and conduction
system.[30] The destruction
of cardiomyocytes and the resulting fibrosis cause architectural myocardial
disarray, which can result in intercellular decoupling. This decoupling could cause
a variability in cardiomyocyte membrane repolarization due to the difference in
duration of their action potentials. Therefore, myocardial zones refractory to
depolarization appear, tending to divide the depolarization current, the mechanism
by which the variability would be linked to arrhythmogenesis, favoring conduction
blocks and reentry induction.[31]The spatial heterogeneity of ventricular repolarization is considered a predisposing
condition to initiate and perpetuate ventricular arrhythmias. That heterogeneity can
be measured by use of the MTWA test, which would justify finding more changes in the
MTWA test of patients with CCC and previous history of malignant arrhythmias.The MTWA test has difficulties related to the high cost of high-resolution electrodes
and its own performance. Many individuals submitted to the test cannot reach and
sustain the heart rate required or cannot undergo the exertion phase on the
treadmill. The amount of indeterminate results due to noise or early interruption
because of the patient's conditions are also a limiting factor. In addition, the
result is classified qualitatively, which can be considered another limitation.This study has limitations related partially to its observational, case-control
design. The number of patients found for the case group was 45, not the 50 predicted
in the sample calculation. The case group, defined by a previous history of
malignant arrhythmias and indication for ICD, had a greater number of patients with
reduced LVEF, of beta-blocker users and of patients with more advanced age. This is
justified by the inclusion criterion in the group, because the patients with reduced
LVEF would be more predisposed to develop ventricular arrhythmias. In addition,
according to the 2007 ordinance,[19]
patients with LVEF < 35% have an indication for priority to undergo ICD
implantation. A logistic regression model was created to correct the disparity
between the groups, maintaining the association between non-negative test and the
occurrence of arrhythmias. The model may, however, not have corrected all
differences between patients. Nevertheless, the large proportional difference of
non-negativity between the case and control groups, corroborated by the magnitude of
the association obtained on logistic regression, suggest that the phenomenon
observed is real and significant.
Conclusion
This study assessed the presence of MTWA in patients with CCC and previous history of
malignant ventricular arrhythmias and in patients with no previous history of those
arrhythmias. The association between non-negativity of the MTWA test and the
occurrence of malignant ventricular arrhythmias in CCC was evidenced. Further
assessment in a prospective study is required to establish the causality and
clinical application of the test in those patients.
Authors: Jadelson Pinheiro de Andrade; José Antônio Marin-Neto; Angelo Amato Vincenzo de Paola; Fábio Vilas-Boas; Gláucia Maria Moraes Oliveira; Fernando Bacal; Edimar Alcides Bocchi; Dirceu Rodrigues Almeida; Abílio Augusto Fragata Filho; Maria da Consolação Vieira Moreira; Sérgio Salles Xavier; Wilson Alves de Oliveira Junior; João Carlos Pinto Dias Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol Date: 2011 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Lotte Raadschilders; Marco Paulo T Barbosa; Andre Assis Carmo; Jan L Nouwen; Manoel Otávio Costa Rocha; Antonio Luiz P Ribeiro Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2015-03-18 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Arthur J Moss; Wojciech Zareba; W Jackson Hall; Helmut Klein; David J Wilber; David S Cannom; James P Daubert; Steven L Higgins; Mary W Brown; Mark L Andrews Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-03-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jorge A Salerno-Uriarte; Gaetano M De Ferrari; Catherine Klersy; Roberto F E Pedretti; Massimo Tritto; Luciano Sallusti; Luigi Libero; Giacinto Pettinati; Giulio Molon; Antonio Curnis; Eraldo Occhetta; Fabrizio Morandi; Paolo Ferrero; Francesco Accardi Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2007-10-22 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Jeanne E Poole; George W Johnson; Anne S Hellkamp; Jill Anderson; David J Callans; Merritt H Raitt; Ramakota K Reddy; Francis E Marchlinski; Raymond Yee; Thomas Guarnieri; Mario Talajic; David J Wilber; Daniel P Fishbein; Douglas L Packer; Daniel B Mark; Kerry L Lee; Gust H Bardy Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-09-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Rosália Morais Torres; Dalmo Correia; Maria do Carmo Pereira Nunes; Walderez O Dutra; André Talvani; Andréa Silvestre Sousa; Fernanda de Souza Nogueira Sardinha Mendes; Maurício Ibrahim Scanavacca; Cristiano Pisani; Maria da Consolação Vieira Moreira; Dilma do Socorro Moraes de Souza; Wilson de Oliveira Junior; Silvia Marinho Martins; João Carlos Pinto Dias Journal: Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz Date: 2022-06-06 Impact factor: 2.747
Authors: Savio Cardoso; Clerio Francisco de Azevedo Filho; Fábio Fernandes; Barbara Ianni; Jorge Andion Torreão; Mateus Diniz Marques; Luiz Francisco Rodrigues de Ávila; Raul Santos Filho; Charles Mady; Roberto Kalil-Filho; José Antônio Franchine Ramires; Marcio Sommer Bittencourt; Carlos E Rochitte Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 2.000