Literature DB >> 9715859

Adverse events with transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: a prospective multicenter study. European 7219 Jewel ICD investigators.

M Rosenqvist1, T Beyer, M Block, K den Dulk, J Minten, F Lindemans.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A newly developed classification system relates adverse events to the surgical procedure or the function of the implantable defibrillator. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Adverse events were monitored during prospective clinical evaluation of the Medtronic model 7219 Jewel ICD and were classified according to the definitions of the ISO 14155 standard for device clinical trials into 3 groups: severe and mild device-related and severe non-device-related adverse events. In addition, events were related to the surgical procedure, treatment with the device, or cardiac function. Seven hundred seventy-eight patients were followed up for an average of 4.0 months after ICD implantation. In total, 356 adverse events were observed in 259 patients. At 1, 3, and 12 months after ICD implantation, 99%, 98%, and 97% of the patients, respectively, survived; 95%, 93%, and 92%, respectively, were free of surgical reintervention; and 79%, 68%, and 51%, respectively, were free of any adverse event. Twenty patients died: 6 deaths were related to the surgical procedure, 12 deaths were considered unrelated to ICD treatment, and 2 patients died of an unknown cause. Of 111 nonlethal severe adverse device effects, 47 required surgical intervention, 19 times for correction of a dislodged lead. Inappropriate delivery of therapy was observed 128 times in 111 patients, and the events were typically resolved by reprogramming or drug adjustment. Nine of these required rehospitalization.
CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 50% of patients experience an adverse event within the first year after ICD implantation. The observed adverse event rate depends on the definitions and the prospective monitoring. The incidence of inappropriate therapy emphasizes the need for improved detection algorithms and for quality-of-life evaluations, especially when considering ICD treatment in high-risk but arrhythmia-free patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9715859     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.98.7.663

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  31 in total

Review 1.  Should all candidates for ICD therapy receive a dual chamber system?

Authors:  W Jung; B Lüderitz
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 2.  [Cardiology update. I: Electrophysiology].

Authors:  P Weismüller; H J Trappe
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1999-01-15

Review 3.  Implantable dual-chamber cardioverter-defibrillator-pacemaker.

Authors:  D Pfeiffer; M Mende; A Hagendorff
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  T wave oversensing in implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

Authors:  Steve S Hsu; Sayed Mohib; Alice Schroeder; Florin T Deger
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Three-dimensional computed tomography imaging of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead fragment in the left ventricle of a heart transplant followed by successful transarterial extraction with a snare catheter.

Authors:  Maximilian Luehr; Ingo Daehnert; Friedrich-Wilhelm Mohr; Markus J Barten
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-04-02

6.  Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock induced by electromagnetic interference while taking a shower.

Authors:  Adina Fernengel; Carlo Schwer; Uwe Helber; Volker Dörnberger
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 5.460

7.  Remote monitoring in implantable defibrillator therapy.

Authors:  D A M J Theuns; L S Jordaens
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  Clinical benefit, survival and adverse events in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: the initial Rotterdam experience.

Authors:  D A M J Theuns; A P J Klootwijk; G P Kimman; M L Simoons; J R T C Roelandt; L J L M Jordaens
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.380

9.  Views of patients with heart failure about their role in the decision to start implantable cardioverter defibrillator treatment: prescription rather than participation.

Authors:  Anders Agård; Rurik Löfmark; Nils Edvardsson; Inger Ekman
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.903

10.  Cardiac ablation catheter guidance by means of a single equivalent moving dipole inverse algorithm.

Authors:  Kichang Lee; Wener Lv; Evgeny Ter-Ovanesyan; Maya E Barley; Graham E Voysey; Anna M Galea; Gordon B Hirschman; Kristen Leroy; Robert P Marini; Conor Barrett; Antonis A Armoundas; Richard J Cohen
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 1.976

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.