Literature DB >> 29637642

Hyperpolarized ketone body metabolism in the rat heart.

Jack J Miller1,2, Daniel R Ball1, Angus Z Lau3,4, Damian J Tyler1.   

Abstract

The aim of this work was to investigate the use of 13 C-labelled acetoacetate and β-hydroxybutyrate as novel hyperpolarized substrates in the study of cardiac metabolism. [1-13 C]Acetoacetate was synthesized by catalysed hydrolysis, and both it and [1-13 C]β-hydroxybutyrate were hyperpolarized by dissolution dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP). Their metabolism was studied in isolated, perfused rat hearts. Hyperpolarized [1-13 C]acetoacetate metabolism was also studied in the in vivo rat heart in the fed and fasted states. Hyperpolarization of [1-13 C]acetoacetate and [1-13 C]β-hydroxybutyrate provided liquid state polarizations of 8 ± 2% and 3 ± 1%, respectively. The hyperpolarized T1 values for the two substrates were 28 ± 3 s (acetoacetate) and 20 ± 1 s (β-hydroxybutyrate). Multiple downstream metabolites were observed within the perfused heart, including acetylcarnitine, citrate and glutamate. In the in vivo heart, an increase in acetylcarnitine production from acetoacetate was observed in the fed state, as well as a potential reduction in glutamate. In this work, methods for the generation of hyperpolarized [1-13 C]acetoacetate and [1-13 C]β-hydroxybutyrate were investigated, and their metabolism was assessed in both isolated, perfused rat hearts and in the in vivo rat heart. These preliminary investigations show that DNP can be used as an effective in vivo probe of ketone body metabolism in the heart.
© 2018 The Authors. NMR in Biomedicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  13C; acetoacetate; hyperpolarization; ketone bodies

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29637642      PMCID: PMC6001529          DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


dimethyl sulphoxide dynamic nuclear polarization 1,4,7,10‐tetraazacyclododecane‐1,4,7,10‐tetraacetic acid electrocardiogram gadolinium heteronuclear multiple bond correlation heart rate Krebs–Henseleit left ventricular developed pressure magnetic resonance imaging nuclear magnetic resonance radiofrequency rate–pressure product signal‐to‐noise ratio tricarboxylic acid

INTRODUCTION

The ketone bodies acetoacetate and 3‐β‐hydroxybutyrate act as important energy sources during starvation.1 Ketone bodies are produced from fatty acid metabolism in the liver under low‐carbohydrate conditions, and their subsequent metabolism plays a key role in sparing glucose utilization and reducing proteolysis.2, 3 This is important, for example, in the maintenance of brain function during low blood glucose conditions, and the use of ketone bodies accounts for nearly two‐thirds of the brain's energy usage during prolonged fasting and starvation.4 As a fuel source, ketone bodies have thermodynamically favourable characteristics, such as oxygen efficiency,5 and are readily oxidized by most organs, except the liver, which lacks acetoacetyl‐CoA thiolase, the enzyme required for the oxidation of ketone bodies via the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle.1 Hyperpolarization using dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) has revolutionized our ability to study non‐invasively metabolic changes in the living heart.6, 7 To date, the vast majority of hyperpolarization studies have focused on observing alterations in the metabolism of [1‐13C]pyruvate,7, 8 which provides unique insights into carbohydrate metabolism. However, alterations in the metabolic pathways of other key fuel molecules are a common feature of cardiovascular diseases,9, 10, 11 and it is known that ketone bodies exhibit a profound regulatory mechanism in controlling the use and release of other substrates, such as fat and glucose.1 The metabolism of acetoacetate and 3‐β‐hydroxybutyrate is known to be altered in various metabolic disease states, including diabetes and diabetic cardiomyopathy,12 and recalcitrant pediatric epilepsy has been clinically treated with a ketogenic diet for more than 70 years.13 The ability to study ketone body metabolism and its regulatory role in vivo may therefore offer new insights into the metabolic derangements seen in a range of disease states, and thus provide a new perspective on potential treatments. In this work, we have investigated the use of hyperpolarized 13C‐labelled acetoacetate and β‐hydroxybutyrate as novel probes in the study of cardiac metabolism. Although several studies have shown the appearance of ketone bodies following the injection of related probes, such as [1‐13C]butyrate14, 15 and [2‐13C]pyruvic acid,16 the in vivo rate of appearance of ketone bodies is necessarily limited owing to organ specificity and the number of separate biochemical reactions required to produce them. The interpretation of the visible appearance (or lack thereof) of ketone bodies produced following the injection of these other probes is not necessarily straightforward and, in particular, the absence of evidence of a particular ketone body is not sufficient evidence of its absence. Such probes may therefore be considered to be inefficient for the study of ketone body metabolism, motivating the desire to look at the utilization of ketone bodies directly. We have therefore built on previous work17 and reported conference abstracts exploring the hyperpolarization of ketone bodies,18, 19, 20, 21 and report a method to generate hyperpolarized [1‐13C]acetoacetate and [1‐13C]β‐hydroxybutyrate. We further investigate the metabolism of [1‐13C]β‐hydroxybutyrate in the isolated, perfused rat heart, and [1‐13C]acetoacetate in both the perfused heart and the rat heart in vivo.

METHODS

Ex vivo experiments were performed using a Bruker Avance 11.7‐T vertical bore magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system (Bruker Biospin GmbH, Ettlingen, Germany). In vivo experiments were performed using an Agilent 7‐T MRI system (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). DNP was performed using a HyperSense hyperpolarizer (Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK) for ex vivo experiments, or a previously described prototype hyperpolarizer6 (GE Healthcare, Amersham, Buckinghamshire, UK) for in vivo experiments. All animal investigations conformed to Home Office Guidance on the Operation of the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act (HMSO) of 1986, to institutional guidelines and were approved by the University of Oxford Animal Ethics Review Committee. All compounds were obtained from Sigma Aldrich (Gillingham, Dorset, UK) unless otherwise specified.

Sample preparation

It was not possible to directly obtain free acetoacetic acid (or its sodium salt) owing to its chemical instability and comparatively short half‐life (approximately 2 h as an acid, several days as a base) at room temperature prior to spontaneous decarboxylation into acetone and carbon dioxide. Therefore, sodium [1‐13C]acetoacetate was produced by base‐catalysed hydrolysis of >99% isotopically labelled ethyl‐[1‐13C]acetoacetate.22 In this process, 250 μL of 8 M neat [1‐13C]ethyl acetoacetate was mixed with 4 mL of 1 M sodium hydroxide at 40°C for 6 h. Water was removed by lyophilization under reduced pressure (1 mbar) at –50°C for approximately 12 h, and the product (a white powder) was stored at –80°C. Immediately prior to hyperpolarization, a stock solution was formulated by mixing 280 mg of the generated sodium [1‐13C]acetoacetate with 9.4 mg of OX063 trityl radical (Oxford Instruments), 50 μL of dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) and 150 μL of H2O. Similarly, a stock solution of [1‐13C]β‐hydroxybutyrate was formulated by mixing 280 mg of [1‐13C]β‐hydroxybutyrate (Sigma Aldrich; >98% purity and >99% 13C) with 9.4 mg of OX063, 50 μL of DMSO and 150 μL of H2O. Polarized samples were made by mixing 33 μL of either stock solution with 3.5 μL of 10mM Gd‐DOTA (Gd, gadolinium; DOTA, 1,4,7,10‐tetraazacyclododecane‐1,4,7,10‐tetraacetic acid; Dotarem, Guerbet, France) prior to vortexing and pipetting into a sample cup for rapid freezing. DNP was then performed at ~94 GHz and 100 mW for 60 min.6 Dissolution was carried out using 6 mL of heated and pressurized deionized water (~180°C, 10 bar), resulting in a final liquid state concentration of 40mM for both substrates. As a result of reagent and instrument availability, separate batches were synthesized for in vivo, ex vivo and phantom experiments. Deionized water was used to ensure that the compounds injected were kept under basic conditions, minimizing the spontaneous rate of decarboxylation occurring during the initial high‐temperature part of the dissolution process, which may otherwise lead to erroneously high recordings of bicarbonate originating from chemically evolved CO2 dissolved in buffer. The spontaneous rate of decarboxylation of acetoacetate is expected to obey an Arrhenius relation whose spectrophotometrically measured23 apparent first‐order rate constant is given by , where which, at 37°C and pH 7, is ~5.5 × 10–7 s–1. Given that the rate of decarboxylation is expected to approximately double for each 10°C rise,24 we therefore only expect the spontaneous decarboxylation of acetoacetate to arise from exposure to temperatures in excess of ~150°C.

Polarization and T 1 measurement

The liquid state polarization and T 1 relaxation times were measured at 11.7 T. Two millilitres of hyperpolarized liquid were injected into a 20‐mm nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) tube within a dual‐tuned 13C/1H probe (M2M Imaging, Cleveland, OH, USA) (n = 3). A 13C pulse and acquire sequence (4096 points; sweep width, 180 ppm; TR = 1 s) with 20 acquisitions at each of three different hard radiofrequency (RF) pulse durations (25, 50 and 75 μs), but constant RF power, was used to obtain spectra from the hyperpolarized sample. RF pulses were cycled in the order [10a, 10b, 10c, 10a, 10b, 10c], where a, b and c represent pulse durations of 25, 50 and 75 μs and ‘10a’ denotes 10 a‐degree pulses with a 1‐s TR. The measured signal decay was used to fit both T 1 and flip angle to correct for the effects of RF excitation. The liquid state nuclear polarization was measured by comparison of the amplitude of the first point of the T 1 decay curve with a subsequently acquired thermal polarization acquisition (TR = 300 s; averages, 24; flip angle, 90°). Signal amplitudes for the acquired spectra were fitted in the time domain using the AMARES algorithm in the jMRUI software package,25, 26 as described and illustrated further in the Supporting Information (Table S2; Figures S5–S8).

Isolated heart perfusion

Hearts from male Wistar rats (body weight, ~300 g; Harlan, Bicester, Oxfordshire, UK) were prepared for perfusion in the Langendorff mode, as described previously.14 Briefly, rats were terminally anaesthetized with 140 mg/kg pentobarbitone. Hearts were then excised and rapidly washed in ice‐cold Krebs–Henseleit (KH) buffer, followed by dissection to reveal the aorta. The aorta was cannulated, tied off with monofilament 3/0 (0.3 mm in diameter) silk suture (Pearsalls, Taunton, Somerset, UK) and the heart was perfused in the Langendorff mode at constant pressure (85 mmHg/11.3 kPa, corresponding to an approximate flow rate of 15 mL/min) using KH buffer at a temperature of 37°C and oxygenated with 95% O2/5% CO2 gas.27, 28, 29, 30 A polyethylene tube was inserted into the left ventricle and through the apex of the heart in order to drain Thebesian flow. A polypropylene balloon connected to a pressure transducer and a PowerLab system (AD Instruments, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK) was then inserted into the left ventricle to monitor contractile function, and the heart was subsequently placed inside a 20‐mm NMR test tube, which was inserted into the bore of the 11.7‐T magnet described above.

Assessment of ketone body metabolism in the perfused heart

Hearts from male Wistar rats (n = 3 per substrate, i.e. six rats in total) were initially perfused with KH buffer containing 10mM glucose. For the assessment of ketone body metabolism using hyperpolarized 13C substrates, dissolution of [1‐13C]acetoacetate and [1‐13C]β‐hydroxybutyrate was carried out, and the hyperpolarized liquid was added to a chamber containing oxygenated KH buffer. This generated a KH buffer with a final substrate concentration of 10mM glucose and 4mM hyperpolarized [1‐13C]acetoacetate or [1‐13C]β‐hydroxybutyrate. The supply to the perfused heart was subsequently switched to the hyperpolarized solution and a 13C pulse–acquire experiment was immediately started (TR = 1 s; hard pulse; sweep width, 180 ppm; 4096 complex points) with a 30° flip angle chosen as a compromise between the signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR), intracellular metabolite signals and magnetization depletion, as discussed elsewhere.31, 32

Assessment of ketone body metabolism in the in vivo heart

Male Wistar rats (n = 4, distinct from the ex vivo study animals; body weight, ~300 g) were scanned in both the fed and subsequently overnight fasted metabolic states. To induce a fasted metabolic state, rats were kept in a 12‐h light/dark cycle and fasted for at least 12 h prior to scanning. A fed metabolic state was induced by scanning under the same conditions without overnight fasting, and with access to ‘standard chow’ ad libitum. Anaesthesia was induced by 2.5–3% isoflurane in oxygen and nitrous oxide (2 L/min oxygen/isoflurane, 0.2 L/min nitrous oxide). Anaesthesia was maintained by means of 2% isoflurane delivered to, and scavenged from, a nose cone during the experiment. A tail vein catheter was placed for intravenous injection of hyperpolarized [1‐13C]acetoacetate. Animals were then placed in a home‐built animal handling system.33 Body temperature was maintained using air heating, and a two‐lead electrocardiogram (ECG) for cardiac gating was obtained using leads placed subcutaneously into the upper forelimbs. Blood ketone and glucose concentrations were measured via a commercially available hand‐held meter (Accu Chek, Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany) following injection of acetoacetate in a separate cohort of rats (n = 4). 1H images were acquired using a 72 mm‐inner‐diameter quadrature birdcage transmit/receive coil (Rapid Biomedical GmbH, Rimpar, Germany). 13C data were acquired using a 20 mm‐diameter 13C butterfly surface coil for signal transmission and reception. The surface coil was positioned on the anterior chest wall, and a thermally polarized 5 M 13C urea phantom was used to calibrate the 13C transmitter power before the 13C scans. A volume covering a 40‐mm slab including the heart was employed for shimming using a three‐dimensional gradient echo automated shim routine34 to reduce the proton linewidth to <1 ppm across the heart. Immediately prior to the injection of the hyperpolarized sample into the rat, an ECG‐gated 13C pulse–acquire sequence (nominal TR = 1 s; hard pulse of 15 μs; flip angle, 10°; sweep width, 6000 Hz; 2048 complex points; 60 measurements) was started, and 2 mL of hyperpolarized [1‐13C]sodium acetoacetate solution was injected over 10 s into the rat via the previously placed tail vein catheter. As documented previously, variation in the R–R interval of the anaesthetized rat yielded a slight variation in TR spacing (on the order of 1–10%) which was accurately measured using custom‐built hardware.35

13C data analysis

All acquired 13C data were summed over a 60‐s period from the first spectrum in which hyperpolarized [1‐13C]acetoacetate or [1‐13C]β‐hydroxybutyrate could be clearly observed, and the summed spectra were fitted using the AMARES algorithm in the jMRUI software package. The AMARES algorithm was adequately constrained by prior knowledge of the spectral location of the numerous closely spaced resonances to enable their resolution. Fitted metabolite amplitudes were subsequently normalized to the maximum [1‐13C]acetoacetate/[1‐13C]β‐hydroxybutyrate amplitude to remove any contribution from polarization and injection timing differences between experiments. In addition, for kinetic analyses, a sliding window of length 5 (~5 s) was applied to the reconstructed data to improve the reconstructed SNR. Further information on spectral fitting is provided in Supporting Information.

Statistical methods

All data are given as mean ± standard error. Mean differences between fed and fasted states were assessed using an unpaired, unequal variance t‐test.

RESULTS

Liquid state polarization and longitudinal relaxation times

Hyperpolarization of [1‐13C]acetoacetate and [1‐13C]β‐hydroxybutyrate provided liquid state polarizations of 8 ± 2% and 3 ± 1%, respectively. The hyperpolarized T 1 values for the two substrates were 28 ± 3 s (acetoacetate) and 20 ± 1 s (β‐hydroxybutyrate) at 11.7 T.

Metabolism of hyperpolarized ketone bodies within the isolated heart

Figure 1 shows the multiple downstream metabolites (and impurities) observed following the infusion of either hyperpolarized [1‐13C]acetoacetate (Figure 1A) or hyperpolarized [1‐13C]β‐hydroxybutyrate (Figure 1B) into the perfused rat heart. The resonances were identified using high‐resolution NMR [1H/13C and two‐dimensional heteronuclear multiple bond correlation (HMBC) performed at 7 T on a Bruker Avance 300 MHz spectrometer] subsequently acquired on chloroform/methanol metabolite extracts from snap‐frozen perfused heart tissue samples and with reference to the literature (shown as Supporting Information (Figures S1–S3; Table S1) with raw datasets provided as Supporting Information). Interconversion between the ketone bodies could be seen for both substrates, whereas infusion of hyperpolarized acetoacetate also allowed for the observation of metabolism into the Krebs cycle intermediates citrate and glutamate, together with the acetyl‐CoA buffering compound, acetylcarnitine. The infusion of ketone bodies did not significantly change the left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP), heart rate (HR) or the rate–pressure product (RPP) within the time course of the NMR experiment (shown in Supporting Information Figure S4). For 60 s prior to infusion, the mean ± standard deviation (SD) LVDP, HR and RPP were 80 ± 20 mmHg, 270 ± 30 bpm and 23 000 ± 8000 bpm mmHg, respectively; for 60 s following infusion, the corresponding means were 82 ± 16 mmHg, 270 ± 40 bpm and 22 000 ± 7000 bpm mmHg; p = not significant by a paired Welch (unequal variance) t‐test or via a non‐parametric Wilcoxon test.
Figure 1

Ketone body metabolism in the perfused rat heart at 11.7 T. (A) Spectrum acquired following the administration of hyperpolarized acetoacetate. The observed resonances are: 1, [1‐13C]acetoacetate (175 ppm); 2, [5‐13C]glutamate + unknown (believed to be acetate impurity, 182 ppm); 3, [1‐13C]β‐hydroxybutyrate (181 ppm); 4, unknown (believed to be acetoacetate hydrate impurity, 180 ppm); 5, unknown (178.8 ppm); 6, [1‐13C]citrate (178.7 ppm); 7, unknown (177 ppm); 8, [1‐13C]acetyl‐carnitine (172.5 ppm); 9, [1‐13C]ethylacetoacetate (batch reagent impurity, 169 ppm); 10, 13C‐bicarbonate (161 ppm); 11, [3‐13C]acetoacetate (210 ppm). (B) Spectrum acquired following the administration of hyperpolarized [1‐13C]β‐hydroxybutyrate. The observed resonances are: 1, [1‐13C]acetoacetate; 3, [1‐13C]β‐hydroxybutyrate; 8, [1‐13C]acetyl‐carnitine. The y‐axis is shown relative to maximum peak intensity

Ketone body metabolism in the perfused rat heart at 11.7 T. (A) Spectrum acquired following the administration of hyperpolarized acetoacetate. The observed resonances are: 1, [1‐13C]acetoacetate (175 ppm); 2, [5‐13C]glutamate + unknown (believed to be acetate impurity, 182 ppm); 3, [1‐13C]β‐hydroxybutyrate (181 ppm); 4, unknown (believed to be acetoacetate hydrate impurity, 180 ppm); 5, unknown (178.8 ppm); 6, [1‐13C]citrate (178.7 ppm); 7, unknown (177 ppm); 8, [1‐13C]acetyl‐carnitine (172.5 ppm); 9, [1‐13C]ethylacetoacetate (batch reagent impurity, 169 ppm); 10, 13C‐bicarbonate (161 ppm); 11, [3‐13C]acetoacetate (210 ppm). (B) Spectrum acquired following the administration of hyperpolarized [1‐13C]β‐hydroxybutyrate. The observed resonances are: 1, [1‐13C]acetoacetate; 3, [1‐13C]β‐hydroxybutyrate; 8, [1‐13C]acetyl‐carnitine. The y‐axis is shown relative to maximum peak intensity The signals measured in the perfused rat heart indicated that downstream metabolism occurred to a greater extent following infusion of hyperpolarized acetoacetate, rather than β‐hydroxybutyrate. This was attributed to the lower T 1 value and polarization level of [1‐13C]β‐hydroxybutyrate relative to [1‐13C]acetoacetate and, as such, β‐hydroxybutyrate was not further pursued as an in vivo probe. A small reagent impurity, ethyl‐[1‐13C]acetoacetate, was visible in the batch of synthesized [1‐13C]acetoacetate used for ex vivo experiments. Owing to the reported subsequent hepatic metabolism of ethyl‐[1‐13C]acetoacetate to ethanol and [1‐13C]acetoacetate,36 the presence of this impurity ex vivo was not considered to be significant for subsequent in vivo translation.

In vivo ketone body metabolism assessed using hyperpolarized [1‐13C]acetoacetate

Figure 2 shows representative in vivo spectra acquired following the injection of 2 mL of 40mM [1‐13C]acetoacetate into fed and fasted rats. Impurities present in the substrate are also shown. The in vivo linewidth (0.5 ppm) was broader than in the isolated perfused heart as a result of cardiac and respiratory motion. Nevertheless, this linewidth was sufficient to resolve metabolism into acetylcarnitine as well as interconversion into β‐hydroxybutyrate. Citrate, located between [1‐13C]acetate and [1‐13C]acetoacetate at 178 ppm, was not observed, however, a small quantity of [3‐13C]acetoacetate at approximately 210 ppm was observed. This was believed to originate from the polarization of the natural abundance 3‐13C label in [1‐13C]acetoacetate. The main impurities in the substrate are believed to be [1‐13C]acetoacetate hydrate (~180 ppm) and [1‐13C]acetate (~182 ppm, which overlaps with the expected chemical shift of [5‐13C]glutamate). However, these impurity resonances were not uniquely identifiable following separate thermal equilibrium NMR experiments (cf. Supporting Information Figure S9), and are believed to originate spontaneously during the initial high‐temperature phase of the dissolution process used for in vivo experiments on prototype hardware. In separate phantom experiments at approximately 37°C, the apparent T 1 value of the resonance at 182 ppm was seen to be the same as that of [1‐13C]acetoacetate (~30 s), indicating that it is in rapid exchange with acetoacetate (Figure 3). In vivo, this resonance decays with a different time course, with a prolongation consistent with metabolic production, and has a different relative amplitude to phantom experiments (in which the total integrated impurity to acetoacetate ratio had a maximum value of ~0.01), suggesting that the Krebs cycle product [5‐13C]glutamate is observable in addition to this impurity. If glutamate was not produced, but this resonance entirely reflected that of the impurity, we would expect it to have the same kinetic behaviour as the injected [1‐13C]acetoacetate. In phantom experiments, both peaks reach their maximum amplitude at the same time and in the same spectra. In vivo, however, the time to peak of ‘glutamate’ occurs 2–4 s after the maximum acetoacetate signal, which is consistent with metabolic production.
Figure 2

Summed spectra acquired following the administration of hyperpolarized [1‐13C]acetoacetate to the in vivo rat heart at 7 T. The displayed spectra are from (a) a phantom dissolution in water, (b) overnight fasted and (c) fed states. The resonances shown indicate conversion of the substrate [1‐13C]acetoacetate (175 ppm) into [1‐13C]acetylcarnitine (172.5 ppm) and [1‐13C]β‐hydroxybutyrate (181 ppm). Two resonances (180 and 182 ppm) are impurities in substrate production (top row), and that at 180 ppm is believed to be acetoacetate hydrate (AcAc‐H). The resonance at 182 ppm, which overlaps with [5‐13C]glutamate, has been denoted ‘glutamate’ in the text, and is believed to be acetate. Decarboxylation to [13C]‐bicarbonate (161 ppm) was observed only in the fed state (bottom row). The horizontal scale at ~210 ppm is expanded compared with that on the right; [3‐13C]acetoacetate is visible at 210 ppm. The ratio of [1‐13C]acetoacetate to [3‐13C]acetoacetate in phantom experiments is ~1%, as expected from natural abundance

Figure 3

Representative kinetic time courses following the injection of hyperpolarized [1‐13C]acetoacetate after application of a sliding window averaging scheme, obtained following infusion of the agent into (a) a plastic phantom and in the (b) fasted and (c) fed states in vivo. Non‐acetoacetate peaks have been multiplied by a factor of ten. The dotted line present shows the point of maximum acetoacetate signal. The difference in the time‐to‐peak between injected acetoacetate and the glutamate + impurity peak is 0 s in the phantom experiment, rising to 2–4 s in vivo. We believe that this delay indicates that additional glutamate is produced underneath the impurity resonance. AcAc, acetoacetate; AcAc‐H, acetoacetate hydrate; BHB, β‐hydroxybutyrate

Summed spectra acquired following the administration of hyperpolarized [1‐13C]acetoacetate to the in vivo rat heart at 7 T. The displayed spectra are from (a) a phantom dissolution in water, (b) overnight fasted and (c) fed states. The resonances shown indicate conversion of the substrate [1‐13C]acetoacetate (175 ppm) into [1‐13C]acetylcarnitine (172.5 ppm) and [1‐13C]β‐hydroxybutyrate (181 ppm). Two resonances (180 and 182 ppm) are impurities in substrate production (top row), and that at 180 ppm is believed to be acetoacetate hydrate (AcAc‐H). The resonance at 182 ppm, which overlaps with [5‐13C]glutamate, has been denoted ‘glutamate’ in the text, and is believed to be acetate. Decarboxylation to [13C]‐bicarbonate (161 ppm) was observed only in the fed state (bottom row). The horizontal scale at ~210 ppm is expanded compared with that on the right; [3‐13C]acetoacetate is visible at 210 ppm. The ratio of [1‐13C]acetoacetate to [3‐13C]acetoacetate in phantom experiments is ~1%, as expected from natural abundance Representative kinetic time courses following the injection of hyperpolarized [1‐13C]acetoacetate after application of a sliding window averaging scheme, obtained following infusion of the agent into (a) a plastic phantom and in the (b) fasted and (c) fed states in vivo. Non‐acetoacetate peaks have been multiplied by a factor of ten. The dotted line present shows the point of maximum acetoacetate signal. The difference in the time‐to‐peak between injected acetoacetate and the glutamate + impurity peak is 0 s in the phantom experiment, rising to 2–4 s in vivo. We believe that this delay indicates that additional glutamate is produced underneath the impurity resonance. AcAc, acetoacetate; AcAc‐H, acetoacetate hydrate; BHB, β‐hydroxybutyrate Figure 4 shows the metabolite ratios following acetoacetate administration in the in vivo heart in the fed and fasted states. A statistically significant increase in the total [1‐13C]acetylcarnitine produced from the injected acetoacetate was observed in the fed state. In addition, a significant decrease in the level of the resonance at 182 ppm was observed in the fasted state. Decarboxylation of acetoacetate into bicarbonate was increased in the fed state compared with the fasted state (p < 0.05). The mean ratio of β‐hydroxybutyrate to acetoacetate was 0.0158 ± 0.005 in the fed state and 0.0163 ± 0.003 in the fasted state (p = not significant). A significant increase was observed in the [3‐13C]acetoacetate to [1‐13C]acetoacetate ratio between the fed (0.0135 ± 0.001) and fasted (0.017 ± 0.003) states (p = 0.04). No other significant differences were observed between the fed and fasted states. After infusion, the mean plasma ketone body concentration was 0.5 ± 0.1mM (fed) and 1.4 ± 0.2mM (fasted). Plasma glucose concentrations were 10.2 ± 2.3mM (fed) and 6.6 ± 0.35mM (fasted), neither of which were significantly different from the reported range under similar fasting conditions.37, 38, 39
Figure 4

Metabolite ratios for β‐hydroxybutyrate (β‐HB), acetylcarnitine, glutamate and bicarbonate following the administration of hyperpolarized [1‐13C]acetoacetate to the in vivo rat heart. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed in 13C‐labelled acetylcarnitine, glutamate + unknown, [3‐13C]acetoacetate and bicarbonate between fed and fasted states

Metabolite ratios for β‐hydroxybutyrate (β‐HB), acetylcarnitine, glutamate and bicarbonate following the administration of hyperpolarized [1‐13C]acetoacetate to the in vivo rat heart. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed in 13C‐labelled acetylcarnitine, glutamate + unknown, [3‐13C]acetoacetate and bicarbonate between fed and fasted states

DISCUSSION

Ketone body metabolism is altered in diseases affecting the heart, including diabetes and diabetic cardiomyopathy. For example, the sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2 inhibitor and novel anti‐diabetic drug, Empaglifozin, has been shown to dramatically reduce mortality and morbidity from cardiovascular causes in a large cohort study of patients with type II diabetes mellitus,40 and is believed to be associated with alterations in ketone body metabolism.41 A better understanding of the metabolic derangements seen in these diseases would provide a new perspective on potential treatments. This work has demonstrated the potential to hyperpolarize the ketone bodies acetoacetate and β‐hydroxybutyrate to a level sufficient to allow the observation of their metabolism in both the isolated perfused rat heart and, in the case of acetoacetate, the in vivo organ. The higher polarization level and longer T 1 value achieved with acetoacetate enabled the observation of its rapid uptake, interconversion with β‐hydroxybutyrate and downstream metabolism into the Krebs cycle, as summarized in Figure 5. However, the spectral position of β‐hydroxybutyrate, in addition to the lower polarization level and shorter T 1, meant that the reliable detection of the resonances of citrate and glutamate were not possible.
Figure 5

Summary of the metabolic pathways together with label positions believed to be probed by both hyperpolarized [1‐13C]acetoacetate and [1‐13C]β‐hydroxybutyrate in both the in vivo and ex vivo rat heart as presented in this work. Compared with the fasted state, acetylcarnitine production was increased, glutamate decreased and bicarbonate increased by feeding

Summary of the metabolic pathways together with label positions believed to be probed by both hyperpolarized [1‐13C]acetoacetate and [1‐13C]β‐hydroxybutyrate in both the in vivo and ex vivo rat heart as presented in this work. Compared with the fasted state, acetylcarnitine production was increased, glutamate decreased and bicarbonate increased by feeding In the in vivo experiments, we observed significant differences in the metabolism of acetoacetate to acetylcarnitine, ‘glutamate’ and bicarbonate between the fed and fasted states (Figure 3). The apparent increased rate of acetylcarnitine production following feeding is consistent with the reported role of acetylcarnitine as a store of acetyl moieties should they be abundant in a post‐prandial state, into which ketone oxidation is directed.42 In the fasted state, ‘glutamate’ levels were higher, which is consistent with an increased flux of ketone bodies into the TCA cycle during fasting. However, further work is required on the synthesis methodology to prevent/remove the impurity that overlaps the glutamate resonance to confirm this finding, as we note that, owing to the presence of the impurity, the relative ratios of other metabolites to ‘glutamate’ are quantitatively dissimilar to those obtained through other methods.15 The ratio of β‐hydroxybutyrate to acetoacetate was apparently unchanged between the fasted and fed states, reflecting the unchanged appearance rate of exchange into β‐hydroxybutyrate; this may reflect on the constancy of the mitochondrial redox state during the relatively short overnight period of fasting undertaken in this experiment. The appearance of 13C‐bicarbonate following the injection of [1‐13C]acetoacetate was observed in both the perfused heart and in vivo. This is presumed to be caused by the spontaneous decarboxylation of acetoacetate to acetone and carbon dioxide. An alternative pathway is the in vivo decarboxylation of acetoacetate catalysed by acetoacetate decarboxylase, which is present within blood.43, 44 The time‐to‐peak intensity for this resonance was the same as that of acetoacetate itself, which indicates that production is rapid. Given that a delay of several seconds was observed between peak acetoacetate and peak acetylcarnitine and β‐hydroxybutyrate, this observation is likely to be consistent with a mechanism not involving transport across the plasma membrane. Similar to Wang et al.,17 we observed [3‐13C]acetoacetate following the injection of acetoacetate synthesized from labelled precursors and expected to be labelled in the [1‐13C] position. We believe that there are two potential explanations for this observation: (1) the polarization of the natural abundance [3‐13C] label in [1‐13C]acetoacetate; and (2) a metabolic explanation that would necessitate multiple enzymatic steps and transport across the plasma and mitochondrial membrane. As the observed [3‐13C]acetoacetate resonance appears to have the same temporal behaviour (namely the same time‐to‐peak) as [1‐13C]acetoacetate, we consider that explanation (1) is more likely. In phantom experiments, the proportion of [3‐13C]acetoacetate is equal to that expected from hyperpolarized natural abundance carbon, but this is not the case in vivo. We hypothesize that this discrepancy may arise on two further grounds: (1) there may exist a difference in the T 1 values of [1‐13C]acetoacetate and [3‐13C]acetoacetate in blood compared with in the phantom; or (2) owing to hardware imperfections and uncertainty in the centre frequency inherent in in vivo hyperpolarized experiments, we may have unwittingly introduced a slight difference in excitation bandwidth between the phantom and in vivo experiments. Interestingly, we observed a difference in [3‐13C]acetoacetate between the fed and fasted states, which we are at present unable to explain, but which represents an area of investigation for future work. We also note that Wang et al.17 did not observe any resonances beyond that ascribed to [1‐13C]acetate and [3‐13C]acetoacetate, and we hypothesize that this may be a result of the greater spectral separation achieved at 7 T than at 3 T. In the perfused heart at 11.7 T, multiple resonances were observed that would otherwise not be resolvable at lower field strengths. Interestingly, we observed substantial 13C‐bicarbonate production almost exclusively in the fed state, but the in vivo significance of this result is not fully understood, although we note that this result is consistent with a difference in label exchange rates based on equilibrium positions, together with the observation in rodents that breath acetone is significantly increased by fasting or ketogenic diets.45 The spontaneous rate of decarboxylation would be expected to be independent of metabolic conditions, and proportional only to the (fixed) quantity of injected labelled compound. We therefore propose that increased bicarbonate production may reflect enzymatic blood decarboxylation, which is expected to be exceptionally rapid.46 In future studies, as well as mechanistically elucidating these changes, we will investigate differences in ketone body metabolism between baseline and diseased states (e.g. in models of type II diabetes), as well as during high cardiac workload. It may also be possible to monitor non‐invasively pathological changes in the mitochondrial redox state as indexed by the ratio between β‐hydroxybutyrate and acetoacetate. In this proof‐of‐principle study, we observed 13C label exchange representing the metabolism of hyperpolarized [1‐13C]acetoacetate and [1‐13C]β‐hydroxybutyrate, whose labelling positions result in reasonable liquid state polarization and T 1 values. However, the in vivo linewidth (0.5 ppm) of these probes following injection makes it challenging to distinguish some of the downstream products of [1‐13C]acetoacetate and, as such, other labelling positions may offer experimental advantages. In particular, [3‐13C]acetoacetate has a chemical shift of 210 ppm, upfield of the carbonyl resonances, although we note that flux through to citrate may introduce label exchange into the [1‐13C]position. In addition, the chemical instability of acetoacetate mandates the use of in‐house synthesis methods, which we have not fully optimized, leading to the production of two prominent impurity resonances that we believe are acetate and acetoacetate hydrate. Owing to the chemical instability of acetoacetate and the necessarily increasing time delay between batch synthesis and each individual experiment, despite our best efforts, it is likely that the exact impurity profile differs between each experiment. Nevertheless, we have demonstrated the regulation of ketone body metabolism in the rat heart, and have shown that the in vivo regulation of ketone body metabolism can be rapidly measured via dissolution DNP using a simple, accessible synthesis route. It should be noted that the chemical instability of the probe may make future translation to human studies challenging, although, if the compound is stored below 0°C, the rate of spontaneous decarboxylation is believed to be low, in part owing to its mechanism (reproduced in Supporting Information). Future work will continue to optimize this technique to improve the purity and yield of the synthetic route, and increase polarization, and also further explore ketone body metabolism in the pathophysiological heart with hyperpolarized MR, which is of critical importance in numerous disease states.

CONCLUSIONS

We report on the use of 13C‐labelled acetoacetate and β‐hydroxybutyrate as novel hyperpolarized substrates in the study of cardiac metabolism. Methods for the generation of hyperpolarized [1‐13C]acetoacetate and [1‐13C]β‐hydroxybutyrate were described, and their metabolism was investigated in both isolated, perfused rat hearts and in the in vivo rat heart. Data S1. Supplementary Material for Hyperpolarized Ketone Body Metabolism in the Rat Heart Click here for additional data file. Supporting info item Click here for additional data file.
  36 in total

1.  Hyperpolarized [1,3-13C2 ]ethyl acetoacetate is a novel diagnostic metabolic marker of liver cancer.

Authors:  Pernille R Jensen; Sonia Colombo Serra; Luigi Miragoli; Magnus Karlsson; Claudia Cabella; Luisa Poggi; Luca Venturi; Fabio Tedoldi; Mathilde H Lerche
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 2.  Starvation in man.

Authors:  G F Cahill
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1970-03-19       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Metabolic imaging of acute and chronic infarction in the perfused rat heart using hyperpolarised [1-13C]pyruvate.

Authors:  Daniel R Ball; Rachel Cruickshank; Carolyn A Carr; Daniel J Stuckey; Philip Lee; Kieran Clarke; Damian J Tyler
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 4.044

4.  Can a Shift in Fuel Energetics Explain the Beneficial Cardiorenal Outcomes in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME Study? A Unifying Hypothesis.

Authors:  Sunder Mudaliar; Sindura Alloju; Robert R Henry
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  The cycling of acetyl-coenzyme A through acetylcarnitine buffers cardiac substrate supply: a hyperpolarized 13C magnetic resonance study.

Authors:  Marie A Schroeder; Helen J Atherton; Michael S Dodd; Phillip Lee; Lowri E Cochlin; George K Radda; Kieran Clarke; Damian J Tyler
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 7.792

6.  Java-based graphical user interface for the MRUI quantitation package.

Authors:  A Naressi; C Couturier; J M Devos; M Janssen; C Mangeat; R de Beer; D Graveron-Demilly
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.533

7.  Robust and high resolution hyperpolarized metabolic imaging of the rat heart at 7 T with 3D spectral-spatial EPI.

Authors:  Jack J Miller; Angus Z Lau; Irvin Teh; Jürgen E Schneider; Paul Kinchesh; Sean Smart; Vicky Ball; Nicola R Sibson; Damian J Tyler
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Hyperpolarized butyrate: a metabolic probe of short chain fatty acid metabolism in the heart.

Authors:  Daniel R Ball; Ben Rowlands; Michael S Dodd; Lydia Le Page; Vicky Ball; Carolyn A Carr; Kieran Clarke; Damian J Tyler
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Measuring changes in substrate utilization in the myocardium in response to fasting using hyperpolarized [1-(13)C]butyrate and [1-(13)C]pyruvate.

Authors:  Jessica A M Bastiaansen; Matthew E Merritt; Arnaud Comment
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Hyperpolarized ketone body metabolism in the rat heart.

Authors:  Jack J Miller; Daniel R Ball; Angus Z Lau; Damian J Tyler
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 4.044

View more
  10 in total

1.  Metabolism of hyperpolarized 13 C-acetoacetate to β-hydroxybutyrate detects real-time mitochondrial redox state and dysfunction in heart tissue.

Authors:  Wei Chen; Gaurav Sharma; Weina Jiang; Nesmine R Maptue; Craig R Malloy; A Dean Sherry; Chalermchai Khemtong
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 4.044

2.  Hyperpolarized Carbon (13C) MRI of the Kidneys: Basic Concept.

Authors:  Cornelius von Morze; Galen D Reed; Zhen J Wang; Michael A Ohliger; Christoffer Laustsen
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

3.  Co-Polarized [1-13C]Pyruvate and [1,3-13C2]Acetoacetate Provide a Simultaneous View of Cytosolic and Mitochondrial Redox in a Single Experiment.

Authors:  Gaurav Sharma; Xiaodong Wen; Nesmine R Maptue; Thomas Hever; Craig R Malloy; A Dean Sherry; Chalermchai Khemtong
Journal:  ACS Sens       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 7.711

4.  A new hyperpolarized 13C ketone body probe reveals an increase in acetoacetate utilization in the diabetic rat heart.

Authors:  Desiree Abdurrachim; Chern Chiuh Woo; Xing Qi Teo; Wei Xin Chan; George K Radda; Philip Teck Hock Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  In vivo detection of γ-glutamyl-transferase up-regulation in glioma using hyperpolarized γ-glutamyl-[1-13C]glycine.

Authors:  Georgios Batsios; Chloé Najac; Peng Cao; Pavithra Viswanath; Elavarasan Subramani; Yutaro Saito; Anne Marie Gillespie; Hikari A I Yoshihara; Peder Larson; Shinsuke Sando; Sabrina M Ronen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Clinical Cardiovascular Applications of Hyperpolarized Magnetic Resonance.

Authors:  Andrew J M Lewis; Damian J Tyler; Oliver Rider
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.727

7.  Magnetic resonance spectroscopy for the study of cns malignancies.

Authors:  Victor Ruiz-Rodado; Jeffery R Brender; Murali K Cherukuri; Mark R Gilbert; Mioara Larion
Journal:  Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 9.795

Review 8.  Use of cardiac magnetic resonance to detect changes in metabolism in heart failure.

Authors:  William D Watson; Jack J J Miller; Andrew Lewis; Stefan Neubauer; Damian Tyler; Oliver J Rider; Ladislav Valkovič
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2020-06

9.  Hyperpolarized ketone body metabolism in the rat heart.

Authors:  Jack J Miller; Daniel R Ball; Angus Z Lau; Damian J Tyler
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 4.044

10.  Hyperpolarized magnetic resonance shows that the anti-ischemic drug meldonium leads to increased flux through pyruvate dehydrogenase in vivo resulting in improved post-ischemic function in the diabetic heart.

Authors:  Dragana Savic; Vicky Ball; Lorenz Holzner; David Hauton; Kerstin N Timm; M Kate Curtis; Lisa C Heather; Damian J Tyler
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2021-01-17       Impact factor: 4.044

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.